TY - JOUR A1 - Kendall, Liam K. A1 - Rader, Romina A1 - Gagic, Vesna A1 - Cariveau, Daniel P. A1 - Albrecht, Matthias A1 - Baldock, Katherine C. R. A1 - Freitas, Breno M. A1 - Hall, Mark A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Molina, Francisco P. A1 - Morten, Joanne M. A1 - Pereira, Janaely S. A1 - Portman, Zachary M. A1 - Roberts, Stuart P. M. A1 - Rodriguez, Juanita A1 - Russo, Laura A1 - Sutter, Louis A1 - Vereecken, Nicolas J. A1 - Bartomeus, Ignasi T1 - Pollinator size and its consequences: Robust estimates of body size in pollinating insects JF - Ecology and Evolution N2 - Body size is an integral functional trait that underlies pollination-related ecological processes, yet it is often impractical to measure directly. Allometric scaling laws have been used to overcome this problem. However, most existing models rely upon small sample sizes, geographically restricted sampling and have limited applicability for non-bee taxa. Allometric models that consider biogeography, phylogenetic relatedness, and intraspecific variation are urgently required to ensure greater accuracy. We measured body size as dry weight and intertegular distance (ITD) of 391 bee species (4,035 specimens) and 103 hoverfly species (399 specimens) across four biogeographic regions: Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. We updated existing models within a Bayesian mixed-model framework to test the power of ITD to predict interspecific variation in pollinator dry weight in interaction with different co-variates: phylogeny or taxonomy, sexual dimorphism, and biogeographic region. In addition, we used ordinary least squares regression to assess intraspecific dry weight ~ ITD relationships for ten bees and five hoverfly species. Including co-variates led to more robust interspecific body size predictions for both bees and hoverflies relative to models with the ITD alone. In contrast, at the intraspecific level, our results demonstrate that the ITD is an inconsistent predictor of body size for bees and hoverflies. The use of allometric scaling laws to estimate body size is more suitable for interspecific comparative analyses than assessing intraspecific variation. Collectively, these models form the basis of the dynamic R package, “pollimetry,” which provides a comprehensive resource for allometric pollination research worldwide. KW - Apoidea KW - biogeography KW - body size KW - dry weight KW - pollimetry KW - pollination KW - predictive models KW - R package KW - Syrphidae Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-325705 VL - 9 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Dainese, Matteo A1 - Gonzalez-Varo, Juan P. A1 - Mudri-Stojnic, Sonja A1 - Riedinger, Verena A1 - Rundlöf, Maj A1 - Scheper, Jeroen A1 - Wickens, Jennifer B. A1 - Wickens, Victoria J. A1 - Bommarco, Riccardo A1 - Kleijn, David A1 - Potts, Simon G. A1 - Roberts, Stuart P. M. A1 - Smith, Henrik G. A1 - Vilà, Montserrat A1 - Vujic, Ante A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf T1 - Mass-flowering crops dilute pollinator abundance in agricultural landscapes across Europe JF - Ecology Letters N2 - Mass-flowering crops (MFCs) are increasingly cultivated and might influence pollinator communities in MFC fields and nearby semi-natural habitats (SNHs). Across six European regions and 2 years, we assessed how landscape-scale cover of MFCs affected pollinator densities in 408 MFC fields and adjacent SNHs. In MFC fields, densities of bumblebees, solitary bees, managed honeybees and hoverflies were negatively related to the cover of MFCs in the landscape. In SNHs, densities of bumblebees declined with increasing cover of MFCs but densities of honeybees increased. The densities of all pollinators were generally unrelated to the cover of SNHs in the landscape. Although MFC fields apparently attracted pollinators from SNHs, in landscapes with large areas of MFCs they became diluted. The resulting lower densities might negatively affect yields of pollinator- dependent crops and the reproductive success of wild plants. An expansion of MFCs needs to be accompanied by pollinator-supporting practices in agricultural landscapes. KW - wild plant pollination KW - Colony growth KW - Densities KW - Context KW - crop pollination KW - Oilseed rape KW - Nesting resources KW - Bee abundance KW - Yield KW - Richness KW - Habitats KW - Agricultural intensification KW - agri-environment schemes KW - biofuels KW - ecosystem services KW - field boundaries KW - landscape compositionv KW - non-crop habitats KW - semi-natural habitats KW - spillover Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-187356 VL - 19 IS - 10 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Bartomeus, Ignasi A1 - Potts, Simon G. A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf A1 - Vaissiere, Bernard E. A1 - Woyciechowski, Michal A1 - Krewenka, Kristin M. A1 - Tscheulin, Thomas A1 - Roberts, Stuart P. M. A1 - Szentgyoergyi, Hajnalka A1 - Westphal, Catrin A1 - Bommarco, Riccardo T1 - Contribution of insect pollinators to crop yield and quality varies with agricultural intensification JF - PEERJ N2 - Background. Up to 75% of crop species benefit at least to some degree from animal pollination for fruit or seed set and yield. However, basic information on the level of pollinator dependence and pollinator contribution to yield is lacking for many crops. Even less is known about how insect pollination affects crop quality. Given that habitat loss and agricultural intensification are known to decrease pollinator richness and abundance, there is a need to assess the consequences for different components of crop production. Methods. We used pollination exclusion on flowers or inflorescences on a whole plant basis to assess the contribution of insect pollination to crop yield and quality in four flowering crops (spring oilseed rape, field bean, strawberry, and buckwheat) located in four regions of Europe. For each crop, we recorded abundance and species richness of flower visiting insects in ten fields located along a gradient from simple to heterogeneous landscapes. Results. Insect pollination enhanced average crop yield between 18 and 71% depending on the crop. Yield quality was also enhanced in most crops. For instance, oilseed rape had higher oil and lower chlorophyll contents when adequately pollinated, the proportion of empty seeds decreased in buckwheat, and strawberries' commercial grade improved; however, we did not find higher nitrogen content in open pollinated field beans. Complex landscapes had a higher overall species richness of wild pollinators across crops, but visitation rates were only higher in complex landscapes for some crops. On the contrary, the overall yield was consistently enhanced by higher visitation rates, but not by higher pollinator richness. Discussion. For the four crops in this study, there is clear benefit delivered by pollinators on yield quantity and/or quality, but it is not maximized under current agricultural intensification. Honeybees, the most abundant pollinator, might partially compensate the loss of wild pollinators in some areas, but our results suggest the need of landscape-scale actions to enhance wild pollinator populations. KW - biodiversity KW - pollination KW - honeybee KW - wild bees KW - agroecosystems KW - native pollinators KW - species richness KW - bee pollinators KW - wild KW - ecosystemservices KW - fruit-quality KW - oilseed rape KW - land-use KW - honey KW - patterns Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-116928 SN - 2167-9843 VL - 2 IS - e328 ER -