TY - JOUR A1 - Steinert, Andre F. A1 - Schröder, Lennart A1 - Sefrin, Lukas A1 - Janßen, Björn A1 - Arnholdt, Jörg A1 - Rudert, Maximilian T1 - The impact of total knee replacement with a customized cruciate-retaining implant design on patient-reported and functional outcomes JF - Journal of Personalized Medicine N2 - Purpose: To treat patients with tricompartimental knee osteoarthritis (OA), a customized cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CCR-TKA) system can be used, including both individualized instrumentation and implants. The objective of this monocentric cohort study was to analyze patient-reported and functional outcomes in a series of patients implanted with the second generation of this customized implant. Methods: At our arthroplasty center, we prospectively recruited a cohort of patients with tricompartmental gonarthrosis to be treated with total knee replacement (TKA) using a customized cruciate-retaining (CCR) implant design. Inclusion criteria for patients comprised the presence of intact posterior cruciate and collateral ligaments and a knee deformity that was restricted to <15° varus, valgus, or flexion contracture. Patients were assessed for their range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster University osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), and short form (SF)-12 physical and mental scores, preoperatively, at 3 and 6 months, as well as at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years of follow-up (FU) postoperatively. Results: The average age of the patient population was 64 years (range: 40–81), the average BMI was 31 (range: 23–42), and in total, 28 female and 45 male patients were included. Implant survivorship was 97.5% (one septic loosening) at an average follow-up of 2.5 years. The KSS knee and function scores improved significantly (p < 0.001) from, respectively, 41 and 53 at the pre-operative visit, to 92 and 86, respectively, at the 5-year post-operative time point. The SF-12 Physical and Mental scores significantly (p < 0.001) improved from the pre-operative values of 28 and 50, to 50 and 53 at the 5-year FU, respectively. Patients experienced significant improvements in their overall knee range of motion, from 106° at the preoperative visit to 122°, on average, 5 years postoperatively. The total WOMAC score significantly (p < 0.001) improved from 49.1 preoperatively to 11.4 postoperatively at 5-year FU. Conclusions: Although there was no comparison to other implants within this study, patients reported high overall satisfaction and improvement in functional outcomes within the first year from surgery, which continued over the following years. These mid-term results are excellent compared with those reported in the current literature. Comparative long-term studies with this device are needed. Level of evidence 3b (individual case–control study). KW - patient-specific KW - custom-made implant KW - total knee arthroplasty KW - TKA KW - knee replacement KW - tricompartmental knee osteoarthritis KW - iTotal Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-312746 SN - 2075-4426 VL - 12 IS - 2 ER - TY - THES A1 - Janßen, Björn T1 - Mittelfristige Ergebnisse (2 - 5 Jahre) nach individueller kreuzbanderhaltender Kniegelenkstotalendoprothetik (Conformis iTotal® CR G2) mit patientenspezifischen Instrumenten und Implantaten T1 - Mid-term results (2 - 5 years) after individual cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty (Conformis iTotal® CR G2) with patient-specific instruments and implants N2 - Die vorliegende Studie mit insgesamt 73 Patienten untersucht das klinische und funktionelle Outcome nach Implantation einer kreuzbanderhaltenden patientenspezifischen Kniegelenkstotalendoprothese vom Typ Conformis iTotal® CR G2. Es handelt sich um eine monozentrische retrospektive und deskriptive Studie zu klinischen und radiologischen Ergebnissen zwei, drei sowie fünf Jahre postoperativ. Es wurden zu Vergleichszwecken auch präoperative Daten erhoben und ausgewertet. Neben klinischen und radiologischen Untersuchungen wurden durch die Verwendung des „Knee Society Scores“, des „WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index“ und des „SF-12 Health Survey“-Fragebogens die Ergebnisse bezüglich Kniefunktion, Schmerz und Lebensqualität erhoben. Die Untersuchungen für das mittelfristige Outcome erfolgten im Zeitraum zwischen November 2012 und Januar 2017 unter standardisierten Bedingungen. Insgesamt zeigte sich im Vergleich zum präoperativen Ausgangswert eine statistisch signifikante Verbesserung aller erhobenen Scores sowie eine verbesserte Funktionalität. Der Vergleich mit anderen veröffentlichten Studien zeigte eine bessere gesamte Implantationsqualität als bei standardisierten Prothesen. Verglichen mit anderen individualisierten Prothesen sind die Ergebnisse ebenfalls etwas besser bzw. zum Teil gleichwertig. Im Gegensatz zu unserer Studie verbesserten sich die Scores bei den meisten Vergleichsstudien nicht signifikant. Im direkten Vergleich mit den einzelnen Punktzahlen der Scores erzielte die Conformis iTotal® CR G2 Prothese in unserer Studie sehr gute, zum Teil deutlich bessere Ergebnisse. Trotz der sehr guten und vielversprechenden Ergebnisse sollte aufgrund der deutlich aufwendigeren und strahlenbelastenden präoperativen Maßnahmen, die zur Implantation einer solchen Prothese notwendig sind, sowie der teilweise eingeschränkten Aussagekraft dieser Studie weitere Langzeitstudien bezüglich Funktionalität und Haltbarkeit der Conformis iTotal® CR G2 Prothese durchgeführt werden. N2 - This study with a total of 73 patients examines the clinical and functional outcome after implantation of a cruciate ligament-preserving patient-specific total knee joint endoprosthesis of the type Conformis iTotal® CR G2. It is a single-center retrospective and descriptive study of clinical and radiological results two, three and five years postoperatively. For comparison purposes, preoperative data were also collected and evaluated. In addition to clinical and radiological examinations, the results of knee function, pain and quality of life were collected using the “Knee Society Score”, the “WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index” and the “SF-12 Health Survey” questionnaire. The examinations for the medium-term outcome were carried out between November 2012 and January 2017 under standardized conditions. Overall, compared to the preoperative baseline value, there was a statistically significant improvement in all recorded scores and improved functionality. The comparison with other published studies showed a better overall implantation quality than with standardized prostheses. Compared to other individualized prostheses, the results are also slightly better or partly equivalent. In contrast to our study, the scores in most of the comparative studies did not improve significantly. In a direct comparison with the individual scores of the scores, the Conformis iTotal® CR G2 prosthesis achieved very good, in some cases significantly better results in our study. Despite the very good and promising results, further long-term studies regarding the functionality and durability of the Conformis iTotal® CR G2 prosthesis should be carried out due to the significantly more complex and radiation-stressing preoperative measures that are necessary for the implantation of such a prosthesis, as well as the partially limited informative value of this study. KW - Knie KW - Prothese KW - Knieprothese KW - individualisierte Prothese KW - iTotal Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-237214 ER -