TY - JOUR A1 - Edelmann, Frank A1 - Wachter, Rolf A1 - Düngen, Hans-Dirk A1 - Störk, Stefan A1 - Richter, Annette A1 - Stahrenberg, Raoul A1 - Neumann, Till A1 - Lüers, Claus A1 - Angermann, Christiane E. A1 - Mehrhof, Felix A1 - Gelbrich, Götz A1 - Pieske, Burkert T1 - Heart failure therapy in diabetic patients-comparison with the recent ESC/EASD guideline JF - Cardiovascular Diabetology N2 - Background: To assess heart failure therapies in diabetic patients with preserved as compared to impaired systolic ventricular function. Methods: 3304 patients with heart failure from 9 different studies were included (mean age 63 +/- 14 years); out of these, 711 subjects had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>= 50%) and 994 patients in the whole cohort suffered from diabetes. Results: The majority (>90%) of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (SHF) and diabetes were treated with an ACE inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or with beta-blockers. By contrast, patients with diabetes and preserved ejection fraction (HFNEF) were less likely to receive these substance classes (p < 0.001) and had a worse blood pressure control (p < 0.001). In comparison to patients without diabetes, the probability to receive these therapies was increased in diabetic HFNEF patients (p < 0.001), but not in diabetic SHF patients. Aldosterone receptor blockers were given more often to diabetic patients with reduced ejection fraction (p < 0.001), and the presence and severity of diabetes decreased the probability to receive this substance class, irrespective of renal function. Conclusions: Diabetic patients with HFNEF received less heart failure medication and showed a poorer control of blood pressure as compared to diabetic patients with SHF. SHF patients with diabetes were less likely to receive aldosterone receptor blocker therapy, irrespective of renal function. KW - Preserved Ejection Fraction KW - Diastocic Dysfunction KW - Myocardial-Infarction KW - Hyperkalemia KW - Eplerenone KW - Mortality KW - Predictors KW - Framingham KW - Morbidity KW - Outcomes Y1 - 2011 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-140397 VL - 10 IS - 15 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Edelmann, Frank A1 - Stahrenberg, Raoul A1 - Gelbrich, Götz A1 - Durstewitz, Kathleen A1 - Angermann, Christiane E. A1 - Düngen, Hans-Dirk A1 - Scheffold, Thomas A1 - Zugck, Christian A1 - Maisch, Bernhard A1 - Regitz-Zagrosek, Vera A1 - Hasenfuß, Gerd A1 - Pieske, Burkert M. A1 - Wachter, Rolf T1 - Contribution of comorbidities to functional impairment is higher in heart failure with preserved than with reduced ejection fraction JF - Clinical Research in Cardiology N2 - Background Comorbidities negatively affect prognosis more strongly in heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) than with reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction. Their comparative impact on physical impairment in HFpEF and HFrEF has not been evaluated so far. Methods and results The frequency of 12 comorbidities and their impact on NYHA class and SF-36 physical functioning score (SF-36 PF) were evaluated in 1,294 patients with HFpEF and 2,785 with HFrEF. HFpEF patients had lower NYHA class (2.0 ± 0.6 vs. 2.4 ± 0.6, p < 0.001) and higher SF-36 PF score (54.4 ± 28.3 vs. 54.4 ± 27.7, p < 0.001). All comorbidities were significantly (p < 0.05) more frequent in HFrEF, except hypertension and obesity, which were more frequent in HFpEF (p < 0.001). Adjusting for age and gender, COPD, anemia, hyperuricemia, atrial fibrillation, renal dysfunction, cerebrovascular disease and diabetes had a similar (p for interaction > 0.05) negative effect in both groups. Obesity, coronary artery disease and peripheral arterial occlusive disease exerted a significantly (p < 0.05) more adverse effect in HFpEF, while hypertension and hyperlipidemia were associated with fewer (p < 0.05) symptoms in HFrEF only. The total impact of comorbidities on NYHA (AUC for prediction of NYHA III/IV vs. I/II) and SF-36 PF (r 2) in multivariate analyses was approximately 1.5-fold higher in HFpEF, and also much stronger than the impact of a 10% decrease in ejection fraction in HFrEF or a 5 mm decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter in HFpEF. Conclusion The impact of comorbidities on physical impairment is higher in HFpEF than in HFrEF. This should be considered in the differential diagnosis and in the treatment of patients with HFpEF. KW - Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction KW - Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction KW - Comorbidities KW - Physical impairment Y1 - 2011 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-134354 VL - 100 IS - 9 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Seegers, Joachim A1 - Zabel, Markus A1 - Grüter, Timo A1 - Ammermann, Antje A1 - Weber-Krüger, Mark A1 - Edelmann, Frank A1 - Gelbrich, Götz A1 - Binder, Lutz A1 - Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph A1 - Gröschel, Klaus A1 - Hasenfuß, Gerd A1 - Feltgen, Nicolas A1 - Pieske, Burkert A1 - Wachter, Rolf T1 - Natriuretic peptides for the detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation JF - Open Heart N2 - Background and purpose: Silent atrial fibrillation (AF) and tachycardia (AT) are considered precursors of ischaemic stroke. Therefore, detection of paroxysmal atrial rhythm disorders is highly relevant, but is clinically challenging. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of natriuretic peptide levels in the detection of paroxysmal AT/AF in a pilot study. Methods: Natriuretic peptide levels were analysed in two independent patient cohorts (162 patients with arterial hypertension or other cardiovascular risk factors and 82 patients with retinal vessel disease). N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and BNP were measured before the start of a 7-day Holter monitoring period carefully screened for AT/AF. Results: 244 patients were included; 16 had paroxysmal AT/AF. After excluding patients with a history of AT/AF (n=5), 14 patients had newly diagnosed AT/AF (5.8%) NT-proBNP and BNP levels were higher in patients with paroxysmal AT/AF in both cohorts: (1) 154.4 (IQR 41.7; 303.6) versus 52.8 (30.4; 178.0) pg/mL and 70.0 (31.9; 142.4) versus 43.9 (16.3; 95.2) and (2) 216.9 (201.4; 277.1) versus 90.8 (42.3–141.7) and 96.0 (54.7; 108.2) versus 29.1 (12.0; 58.1). For the detection of AT/AF episodes, NT-proBNP and BNP had an area under the curve in receiver operating characteristic analysis of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.88; p=0.002) and 0.75 (0.61 to 0.89; p=0.004), respectively. Conclusions: NT-proBNP and BNP levels are elevated in patients with silent AT/AF as compared with sinus rhythm. Thus, screening for undiagnosed paroxysmal AF using natriuretic peptide level initiated Holter monitoring may be a useful strategy in prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. KW - paroxysmal atrial fibrillation KW - ischaemic stroke KW - natriuretic peptide levels Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-149939 VL - 2 IS - e000182 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Edelmann, Frank A1 - Musial-Bright, Lindy A1 - Gelbrich, Goetz A1 - Trippel, Tobias A1 - Radenovic, Sara A1 - Wachter, Rolf A1 - Inkrot, Simone A1 - Loncar, Goran A1 - Tahirovic, Elvis A1 - Celic, Vera A1 - Veskovic, Jovan A1 - Zdravkovic, Marija A1 - Lainscak, Mitja A1 - Apostolović, Svetlana A1 - Neskovic, Aleksandar N. A1 - Pieske, Burkert A1 - Düngen, Hans-Dirk T1 - Tolerability and feasibility of beta-blocker titration in HFpEF versus HFrEF: Insights from the CIBIS-ELD trial JF - JACC: Heart Failure N2 - OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the tolerability and feasibility of titration of 2 distinctly acting beta-blockers (BB) in elderly heart failure patients with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) left ventricular ejection fraction. BACKGROUND: Broad evidence supports the use of BB in HFrEF, whereas the evidence for beta blockade in HFpEF is uncertain. METHODS: In the CIBIS-ELD (Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study in Elderly) trial, patients >65 years of age with HFrEF (n = 626) or HFpEF (n = 250) were randomized to bisoprolol or carvedilol. Both BB were up-titrated to the target or maximum tolerated dose. Follow-up was performed after 12 weeks. HFrEF and HFpEF patients were compared regarding tolerability and clinical effects (heart rate, blood pressure, systolic and diastolic functions, New York Heart Association functional class, 6-minute-walk distance, quality of life, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). RESULTS: For both of the BBs, tolerability and daily dose at 12 weeks were similar. HFpEF patients demonstrated higher rates of dose escalation delays and treatment-related side effects. Similar HR reductions were observed in both groups (HFpEF: 6.6 beats/min; HFrEF: 6.9 beats/min, p = NS), whereas greater improvement in NYHA functional class was observed in HFrEF (HFpEF: 23% vs. HFrEF: 34%, p < 0.001). Mean E/e' and left atrial volume index did not change in either group, although E/A increased in HFpEF. CONCLUSIONS: BB tolerability was comparable between HFrEF and HFpEF. Relevant reductions of HR and blood pressure occurred in both groups. However, only HFrEF patients experienced considerable improvements in clinical parameters and Left ventricular function. Interestingly, beta-blockade had no effect on established and prognostic markers of diastolic function in either group. Long-term studies using modern diagnostic criteria for HFpEF are urgently needed to establish whether BB therapy exerts significant clinical benefit in HFpEF. (Comparison of Bisoprolol and Carvedilol in Elderly Heart Failure HF] Patients: A Randomised, Double-Blind Multicentre Study CIBIS-ELD]; ISRCTN34827306). KW - beta-blockers KW - heart failure KW - HFpEF KW - HFrEF KW - tolerability Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-191022 VL - 4 IS - 2 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schnabel, Renate B. A1 - Camen, Stephan A1 - Knebel, Fabian A1 - Hagendorff, Andreas A1 - Bavendiek, Udo A1 - Böhm, Michael A1 - Doehner, Wolfram A1 - Endres, Matthias A1 - Gröschel, Klaus A1 - Goette, Andreas A1 - Huttner, Hagen B. A1 - Jensen, Christoph A1 - Kirchhof, Paulus A1 - Korosoglou, Grigorius A1 - Laufs, Ulrich A1 - Liman, Jan A1 - Morbach, Caroline A1 - Navabi, Darius Günther A1 - Neumann-Haefelin, Tobias A1 - Pfeilschifter, Waltraut A1 - Poli, Sven A1 - Rizos, Timolaos A1 - Rolf, Andreas A1 - Röther, Joachim A1 - Schäbitz, Wolf Rüdiger A1 - Steiner, Thorsten A1 - Thomalla, Götz A1 - Wachter, Rolf A1 - Haeusler, Karl Georg T1 - Expert opinion paper on cardiac imaging after ischemic stroke JF - Clinical Research in Cardiology N2 - This expert opinion paper on cardiac imaging after acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) includes a statement of the "Heart and Brain" consortium of the German Cardiac Society and the German Stroke Society. The Stroke Unit-Commission of the German Stroke Society and the German Atrial Fibrillation NETwork (AFNET) endorsed this paper. Cardiac imaging is a key component of etiological work-up after stroke. Enhanced echocardiographic tools, constantly improving cardiac computer tomography (CT) as well as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offer comprehensive non- or less-invasive cardiac evaluation at the expense of increased costs and/or radiation exposure. Certain imaging findings usually lead to a change in medical secondary stroke prevention or may influence medical treatment. However, there is no proof from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that the choice of the imaging method influences the prognosis of stroke patients. Summarizing present knowledge, the German Heart and Brain consortium proposes an interdisciplinary, staged standard diagnostic scheme for the detection of risk factors of cardio-embolic stroke. This expert opinion paper aims to give practical advice to physicians who are involved in stroke care. In line with the nature of an expert opinion paper, labeling of classes of recommendations is not provided, since many statements are based on expert opinion, reported case series, and clinical experience. KW - cardiac imaging KW - echocardiography KW - ischemic stroke KW - transient ischemic attack KW - expert opinion KW - magnetic resonance imaging KW - computed tomography Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-266662 SN - 1861-0692 VL - 110 IS - 7 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gerhardt, Louisa M. S. A1 - Kordsmeyer, Maren A1 - Sehner, Susanne A1 - Güder, Gülmisal A1 - Störk, Stefan A1 - Edelmann, Frank A1 - Wachter, Rolf A1 - Pankuweit, Sabine A1 - Prettin, Christiane A1 - Ertl, Georg A1 - Wanner, Christoph A1 - Angermann, Christiane E. T1 - Prevalence and prognostic impact of chronic kidney disease and anaemia across ACC/AHA precursor and symptomatic heart failure stages JF - Clinical Research in Cardiology N2 - Background The importance of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and anaemia has not been comprehensively studied in asymptomatic patients at risk for heart failure (HF) versus those with symptomatic HF. We analysed the prevalence, characteristics and prognostic impact of both conditions across American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) precursor and HF stages A–D. Methods and results 2496 participants from three non-pharmacological German Competence Network HF studies were categorized by ACC/AHA stage; stage C patients were subdivided into C1 and C2 (corresponding to NYHA classes I/II and III, respectively). Overall, patient distribution was 8.1%/35.3%/32.9% and 23.7% in ACC/AHA stages A/B/C1 and C2/D, respectively. These subgroups were stratified by the absence ( – ) or presence ( +) of CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73m2) and anaemia (haemoglobin in women/men < 12/ < 13 g/dL). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 5-year follow-up. Prevalence increased across stages A/B/C1 and C2/D (CKD: 22.3%/23.6%/31.6%/54.7%; anaemia: 3.0%/7.9%/21.7%/33.2%, respectively), with concordant decreases in median eGFR and haemoglobin (all p < 0.001). Across all stages, hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals] for all-cause mortality were 2.1 [1.8–2.6] for CKD + , 1.7 [1.4–2.0] for anaemia, and 3.6 [2.9–4.6] for CKD + /anaemia + (all p < 0.001). Population attributable fractions (PAFs) for 5-year mortality related to CKD and/or anaemia were similar across stages A/B, C1 and C2/D (up to 33.4%, 30.8% and 34.7%, respectively). Conclusions Prevalence and severity of CKD and anaemia increased across ACC/AHA stages. Both conditions were individually and additively associated with increased 5-year mortality risk, with similar PAFs in asymptomatic patients and those with symptomatic HF. KW - anaemia KW - ACC/AHA classification KW - chronic kidney disease KW - comorbidity KW - heart failure KW - mortality Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323990 VL - 112 IS - 7 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kerwagen, Fabian A1 - Riemer, Uwe A1 - Wachter, Rolf A1 - von Haehling, Stephan A1 - Abdin, Amr A1 - Böhm, Michael A1 - Schulz, Martin A1 - Störk, Stefan T1 - Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on implementation of novel guideline-directed medical therapies for heart failure in Germany: a nationwide retrospective analysis JF - The Lancet Regional Health - Europe N2 - Background Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is the cornerstone in the treatment of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and novel substances such as sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have demonstrated marked clinical benefits. We investigated their implementation into real-world HF care in Germany before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic period. Methods The IQVIA LRx data set is based on ∼80% of 73 million people covered by the German statutory health insurance. Prescriptions of S/V were used as a proxy for HFrEF. Time trends were analysed between Q1/2016 and Q2/2023 for prescriptions for S/V alone and in combination therapy with SGLT2i. Findings The number of patients treated with S/V increased from 5260 in Q1/2016 to 351,262 in Q2/2023. The share of patients with combination therapy grew from 0.6% (29 of 5260) to 14.2% (31,128 of 219,762) in Q2/2021, and then showed a steep surge up to 54.8% (192,429 of 351,262) in Q2/2023, coinciding with the release of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for HF in Q3/2021. Women and patients aged >80 years were treated less often with combined therapy than men and younger patients. With the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of patients with new S/V prescriptions dropped by 17.5% within one quarter, i.e., from 26,855 in Q1/2020 to 22,145 in Q2/2020, and returned to pre-pandemic levels only in Q1/2021. Interpretation The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a 12-month deceleration of S/V uptake in Germany. Following the release of the ESC HF guidelines, the combined prescription of S/V and SGLT2i was readily adopted. Further efforts are needed to fully implement GDMT and strengthen the resilience of healthcare systems during public health crises. KW - health policy KW - oncology KW - internal medicine KW - heart failure KW - COVID-19 KW - sacubitril-valsartan KW - sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors KW - guideline-directed medical therapy KW - evidence-based practice KW - real-world Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-350510 SN - 2666-7762 VL - 35 ER -