TY - INPR A1 - Dandekar, Thomas T1 - Biological heuristics applied to cosmology suggests a condensation nucleus as start of our universe and inflation cosmology replaced by a period of rapid Weiss domain-like crystal growth N2 - Cosmology often uses intricate formulas and mathematics to derive new theories and concepts. We do something different in this paper: We look at biological processes and derive from these heuristics so that the revised cosmology agrees with astronomical observations but does also agree with standard biological observations. We show that we then have to replace any type of singularity at the start of the universe by a condensation nucleus and that the very early period of the universe usually assumed to be inflation has to be replaced by a period of rapid crystal growth as in Weiss magnetization domains. Impressively, these minor modifications agree well with astronomical observations including removing the strong inflation perturbations which were never observed in the recent BICEP2 experiments. Furthermore, looking at biological principles suggests that such a new theory with a condensation nucleus at start and a first rapid phase of magnetization-like growth of the ordered, physical laws obeying lattice we live in is in fact the only convincing theory of the early phases of our universe that also is compatible with current observations. We show in detail in the following that such a process of crystal creation, breaking of new crystal seeds and ultimate evaporation of the present crystal readily leads over several generations to an evolution and selection of better, more stable and more self-organizing crystals. Moreover, this explains the “fine-tuning” question why our universe is fine-tuned to favor life: Our Universe is so self-organizing to have enough offspring and the detailed physics involved is at the same time highly favorable for all self-organizing processes including life. This biological theory contrasts with current standard inflation cosmologies. The latter do not perform well in explaining any phenomena of sophisticated structure creation or self-organization. As proteins can only thermodynamically fold by increasing the entropy in the solution around them we suggest for cosmology a condensation nucleus for a universe can form only in a “chaotic ocean” of string-soup or quantum foam if the entropy outside of the nucleus rapidly increases. We derive an interaction potential for 1 to n-dimensional strings or quantum-foams and show that they allow only 1D, 2D, 4D or octonion interactions. The latter is the richest structure and agrees to the E8 symmetry fundamental to particle physics and also compatible with the ten dimensional string theory E8 which is part of the M-theory. Interestingly, any other interactions of other dimensionality can be ruled out using Hurwitz compositional theorem. Crystallization explains also extremely well why we have only one macroscopic reality and where the worldlines of alternative trajectories exist: They are in other planes of the crystal and for energy reasons they crystallize mostly at the same time, yielding a beautiful and stable crystal. This explains decoherence and allows to determine the size of Planck´s quantum h (very small as separation of crystal layers by energy is extremely strong). Ultimate dissolution of real crystals suggests an explanation for dark energy agreeing with estimates for the “big rip”. The halo distribution of dark matter favoring galaxy formation is readily explained by a crystal seed starting with unit cells made of normal and dark matter. That we have only matter and not antimatter can be explained as there may be right handed mattercrystals and left-handed antimatter crystals. Similarly, real crystals are never perfect and we argue that exactly such irregularities allow formation of galaxies, clusters and superclusters. Finally, heuristics from genetics suggest to look for a systems perspective to derive correct vacuum and Higgs Boson energies. KW - heuristics KW - inflation KW - cosmology KW - crystallization KW - crystal growth KW - E8 symmetry KW - Hurwitz theorem KW - evolution KW - Lee Smolin Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-183945 ER - TY - INPR A1 - Dandekar, Thomas T1 - Why are nature´s constants so fine-tuned? The case for an escalating complex universe N2 - Why is our universe so fine-tuned? In this preprint we discuss that this is not a strange accident but that fine-tuned universes can be considered to be exceedingly large if one counts the number of observable different states (i.e. one aspect of the more general preprint http://www.opus-bayern.de/uni-wuerzburg/volltexte/2009/3353/). Looking at parameter variation for the same set of physical laws simple and complex processes (including life) and worlds in a multiverse are compared in simple examples. Next the anthropocentric principle is extended as many conditions which are generally interpreted anthropocentric only ensure a large space of different system states. In particular, the observed over-tuning beyond the level for our existence is explainable by these system considerations. More formally, the state space for different systems becomes measurable and comparable looking at their output behaviour. We show that highly interacting processes are more complex then Chaitin complexity, the latter denotes processes not compressible by shorter descriptions (Kolomogorov complexity). The complexity considerations help to better study and compare different processes (programs, living cells, environments and worlds) including dynamic behaviour and can be used for model selection in theoretical physics. Moreover, the large size (in terms of different states) of a world allowing complex processes including life can in a model calculation be determined applying discrete histories from quantum spin-loop theory. Nevertheless there remains a lot to be done - hopefully the preprint stimulates further efforts in this area. N2 - Dieses Preprint vertieft einen Aspekt des preprints http://www.opus-bayern.de/uni-wuerzburg/volltexte/2009/3353/, nämlich die Balance zwischen den Konstanten für unsere Naturgesetze. Die Frage nach einer solchen Balance entsteht nur, wenn man sich ein Multiversum mit vielen Alternativen Universen mit anderen Gewichten für die Naturkonstanten vorstellt und dann feststellt, dass diese gerade in unserem Universum optimal für Leben und überhaupt für komplexe, selbst organisierende Strukturen eingestellt sind (sogenanntes fine-tuning). Dies wird häufig mit dem anthropozentrischen Prinzip erklärt. Dies erklärt aber beispielsweise nicht, warum denn dieses fine-tuning noch deutlich feiner und genauer eingestellt ist, als für die Existenz eines Beobachters nötig ist. Wir zeigen dagegen, dass unser Universum besonders komplex ist und einen sehr großen Zustandsraum hat und Bedingungen, die eine hohe Komplexität erlauben, auch einen Beobachter und komplexe Prozesse wie Leben ermöglichen. Allgemein nimmt ein besonders komplexer Zustandsraum den Löwenanteil aller Alternativen ein. Unsere Komplexitätsbetrachtung kann auf verschiedenste Prozesse (Welten, Umwelten, lebende Zellen, Computerprogramme) angewandt werden, hilft bei der Modellauswahl in der theoretischen Physik (Beispiele werden gezeigt) und kann auch direkt ausgerechnet werden, dies wird für eine Modellrechnung zur Quantenschleifentheorie durchgeführt. Dennoch bleibt hier noch viel weitere Arbeit zu leisten, das Preprint kann hier nur einen Anstoß liefern. KW - Natur KW - Naturgesetz KW - Beobachter KW - Kolmogorov-Komplexität KW - Berechnungskomplexität KW - Fundamentalkonstante KW - Nature constants KW - complexity KW - observer KW - fine-tuning KW - multiverse Y1 - 2008 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-34488 ER - TY - INPR A1 - Dandekar, Thomas T1 - Some general system properties of a living observer and the environment he explores N2 - In a nice assay published in Nature in 1993 the physicist Richard God III started from a human observer and made a number of witty conclusions about our future prospects giving estimates for the existence of the Berlin Wall, the human race and all the rest of the universe. In the same spirit, we derive implications for "the meaning of life, the universe and all the rest" from few principles. Adams´ absurd answer "42" tells the lesson "garbage in / garbage out" - or suggests that the question is non calculable. We show that experience of "meaning" and to decide fundamental questions which can not be decided by formal systems imply central properties of life: Ever higher levels of internal representation of the world and an escalating tendency to become more complex. An observer, "collecting observations" and three measures for complexity are examined. A theory on living systems is derived focussing on their internal representation of information. Living systems are more complex than Kolmogorov complexity ("life is NOT simple") and overcome decision limits (Gödel theorem) for formal systems as illustrated for cell cycle. Only a world with very fine tuned environments allows life. Such a world is itself rather complex and hence excessive large in its space of different states – a living observer has thus a high probability to reside in a complex and fine tuned universe. N2 - Dieser Aufsatz ist ein Preprint und Discussion Paper und versucht - ähnlich wie ein hervorragendes Beispiel eines Physikers, Richard God III (1993 in Nature veröffentlicht) mit einfachen Grundannahmen sehr generelle Prinzipien für uns abzuleiten. In meinem Aufsatz sind das insbesondere Prinzipien für Beobachten, für die Existenz eines Beobachters und sogar für die Existenz unserer komplexen Welt, die Fortentwicklung von Leben, die Entstehung von Bedeutung und das menschliche Entscheiden von Grundlagenfragen. Aufs erste kann so ein weitgehendes Anliegen nicht wirklich vollständig und akkurat gelingen, der Aufsatz möchte deshalb auch nur eine amüsante Spekulation sein, exakte (und bescheidenere) Teilaussagen werden aber später dann auch nach peer Review veröffentlicht werden. KW - Komplex KW - Entscheidung KW - Natürliche Auslese KW - Evolution KW - Bedeutung KW - Komplexität KW - Gödel KW - Entscheidungen KW - complexity KW - decision KW - evolution KW - selection KW - meaning Y1 - 2007 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-33537 ER -