TY  - JOUR
A1  - Fuj, Shigeo
A1  - Kapp, Markus
A1  - Einsele, Hermann
T1  - Possible Implication of Bacterial Infection in Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
JF  - Frontiers in Oncology
N2  - Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is still one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In the pathogenesis of acute GVHD, it has been established that donor-derived T-cells activated in the recipient play a major role in GVHD in initiation and maintenance within an inflammatory cascade. To reduce the risk of GVHD, intensification of GVHD prophylaxis like T-cell depletion is effective, but it inevitably increases the risk of infectious diseases and abrogates beneficial graft-versus-leukemia effects. Although various cytokines are considered to play an important role in the pathogenesis of GVHD, GVHD initiation is such a complex process that cannot be prevented by means of single inflammatory cytokine inhibition. Thus, efficient methods to control the whole inflammatory milieu both on cellular and humoral view are needed. In this context, infectious diseases can theoretically contribute to an elevation of inflammatory cytokines after allogeneic HSCT and activation of various subtypes of immune effector cells, which might in summary lead to an aggravation of acute GVHD. The appropriate treatments or prophylaxis of bacterial infection during the early phase after allogeneic HSCT might be beneficial to reduce not only infectious-related but also GVHD-related mortality. Here, we aim to review the literature addressing the interactions of bacterial infections and GVHD after allogeneic HSCT.
KW  - pathogen-associated molecular patterns
KW  - LPS
KW  - GVHD
KW  - bacterial infection
KW  - allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Y1  - 2014
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-120674
SN  - 2234-943X
VL  - 4
IS  - 89
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Gratwohl, A
A1  - Pfirrmann, M
A1  - Zander, A
A1  - Kröger, N
A1  - Beelen, D
A1  - Novotny, J
A1  - Nerl, C
A1  - Scheid, C
A1  - Spiekermann, K
A1  - Mayer, J
A1  - Sayer, HG
A1  - Falge, C
A1  - Bunjes, D
A1  - Döhner, H
A1  - Ganser, A
A1  - Schmidt-Wolf, I
A1  - Schwerdtfeger, R
A1  - Baurmann, H
A1  - Kuse, R
A1  - Schmitz, N
A1  - Wehmeier, A
A1  - Fischer, J Th
A1  - Ho, AD
A1  - Wilhelm, M
A1  - Goebeler, M-E
A1  - Lindemann, HW
A1  - Bormann, M
A1  - Hertenstein, B
A1  - Schlimok, G
A1  - Baerlocher, GM
A1  - Aul, C
A1  - Pfreundschuh, M
A1  - Fabian, M
A1  - Staib, P
A1  - Edinger, M
A1  - Schatz, M
A1  - Fauser, A
A1  - Arnold, R
A1  - Kindler, T
A1  - Wulf, G
A1  - Rosselet, A
A1  - Hellmann, A
A1  - Schäfer, E
A1  - Prümmer, O
A1  - Schenk, M
A1  - Hasford, J
A1  - Heimpel, H
A1  - Hossfeld, DK
A1  - Kolb, H-J
A1  - Büsche, G
A1  - Haferlach, C
A1  - Schnittger, S
A1  - Müller, MC
A1  - Reiter, A
A1  - Berger, U
A1  - Saußele, S
A1  - Hochhaus, A
A1  - Hehlmann, R
T1  - Long-term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: a randomized comparison of stem cell transplantation with drug treatment
JF  - Leukemia
N2  - Tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent today's treatment of choice in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is regarded as salvage therapy. This prospective randomized CML-study IIIA recruited 669 patients with newly diagnosed CML between July 1997 and January 2004 from 143 centers. Of these, 427 patients were considered eligible for HSCT and were randomized by availability of a matched family donor between primary HSCT (group A; N=166 patients) and best available drug treatment (group B; N=261). Primary end point was long-term survival. Survival probabilities were not different between groups A and B (10-year survival: 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69–0.82) vs 0.69 (95% CI: 0.61–0.76)), but influenced by disease and transplant risk. Patients with a low transplant risk showed superior survival compared with patients with high- (P<0.001) and non-high-risk disease (P=0.047) in group B; after entering blast crisis, survival was not different with or without HSCT. Significantly more patients in group A were in molecular remission (56% vs 39%; P = 0.005) and free of drug treatment (56% vs 6%; P<0.001). Differences in symptoms and Karnofsky score were not significant. In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, HSCT remains a valid option when both disease and transplant risk are considered.
KW  - chronic myeloid leukemia
KW  - stem cell transplantation
KW  - drug treatment
KW  - CML
KW  - tyrosine kinase inhibitors
KW  - allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Y1  - 2016
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-150368
VL  - 30
ER  -