TY  - JOUR
A1  - Riquelme, Paloma
A1  - Haarer, Jan
A1  - Kammler, Anja
A1  - Walter, Lisa
A1  - Tomiuk, Stefan
A1  - Ahrens, Norbert
A1  - Wege, Anja K.
A1  - Goecze, Ivan
A1  - Zecher, Daniel
A1  - Banas, Bernhard
A1  - Spang, Rainer
A1  - Fändrich, Fred
A1  - Lutz, Manfred B.
A1  - Sawitzki, Birgit
A1  - Schlitt, Hans J.
A1  - Ochando, Jordi
A1  - Geissler, Edward K.
A1  - Hutchinson, James A.
T1  - TIGIT\(^+\) iTregs elicited by human regulatory macrophages control T cell immunity
JF  - Nature Communications
N2  - Human regulatory macrophages (Mreg) have shown early clinical promise as a cell-based adjunct immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation. It is hypothesised that recipient CD4(+) T cell responses are actively regulated through direct allorecognition of donor-derived Mregs. Here we show that human Mregs convert allogeneic CD4(+) T cells to IL-10-producing, TIGIT(+) FoxP3(+)-induced regulatory T cells that non-specifically suppress bystander T cells and inhibit dendritic cell maturation. Differentiation of Mreg-induced Tregs relies on multiple non-redundant mechanisms that are not exclusive to interaction of Mregs and T cells, including signals mediated by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, TGF-beta, retinoic acid, Notch and progestagen-associated endometrial protein. Preoperative administration of donor-derived Mregs to living-donor kidney transplant recipients results in an acute increase in circulating TIGIT(+) Tregs. These results suggest a feed-forward mechanism by which Mreg treatment promotes allograft acceptance through rapid induction of direct-pathway Tregs.
KW  - Allotransplantation
KW  - Immunosuppression
KW  - Monocytes and macrophages
KW  - Regulatory T cells
Y1  - 2018
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-226321
VL  - 9
IS  - 9
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Dörhöfer, Lena
A1  - Lammert, Alexander
A1  - Krane, Vera
A1  - Gorski, Mathias
A1  - Banas, Bernhard
A1  - Wanner, Christoph
A1  - Krämer, Bernhard K.
A1  - Heid, Iris M.
A1  - Böger, Carsten A.
T1  - Study design of DIACORE (DIAbetes COhoRtE) - a cohort study of patients with diabetes mellitus type 2
JF  - BMC Medical Genetics
N2  - Background: Diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) is highly associated with increased risk for chronic kidney disease (CKD), end stage renal disease (ESRD) and cardiovascular morbidity. Epidemiological and genetic studies generate hypotheses for innovative strategies in DM2 management by unravelling novel mechanisms of diabetes complications, which is essential for future intervention trials. We have thus initiated the DIAbetes COhoRtE study (DIACORE). 
Methods: DIACORE is a prospective cohort study aiming to recruit 6000 patients of self-reported Caucasian ethnicity with prevalent DM2 for at least 10 years of follow-up. Study visits are performed in University-based recruiting clinics in Germany using standard operating procedures. All prevalent DM2 patients in outpatient clinics surrounding the recruiting centers are invited to participate. At baseline and at each 2-year follow-up examination, patients are subjected to a core phenotyping protocol. This includes a standardized online questionnaire and physical examination to determine incident micro-and macrovascular DM2 complications, malignancy and hospitalization, with a primary focus on renal events. Confirmatory outcome information is requested from patient records. Blood samples are obtained for a centrally analyzed standard laboratory panel and for biobanking of aliquots of serum, plasma, urine, mRNA and DNA for future scientific use. A subset of the cohort is subjected to extended phenotyping, e. g. sleep apnea screening, skin autofluorescence measurement, non-mydriatic retinal photography and non-invasive determination of arterial stiffness. 
Discussion: DIACORE will enable the prospective evaluation of factors involved in DM2 complication pathogenesis using high-throughput technologies in biosamples and genetic epidemiological studies.
KW  - chronic kidney-disease
KW  - stage renal-disease
KW  - glomerular-filtration-rate
KW  - genome-wide association
KW  - blood-glucose control
KW  - genetics
KW  - serum creatinine
KW  - cardiovascular disease
KW  - replacement therapy
KW  - United States
KW  - risk factors
KW  - diabetes mellitus type 2
KW  - diabetic nephropathy
KW  - end stage renal disease
KW  - cardiovascular morbidity
KW  - diabetes complications
KW  - epidemiology
Y1  - 2013
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-122040
SN  - 1471-2350
VL  - 14
IS  - 25
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Assfalg, Volker
A1  - Selig, Katharina
A1  - Tolksdorf, Johanna
A1  - van Meel, Marieke
A1  - de Vries, Erwin
A1  - Ramsoebhag, Anne‐Marie
A1  - Rahmel, Axel
A1  - Renders, Lutz
A1  - Novotny, Alexander
A1  - Matevossian, Edouard
A1  - Schneeberger, Stefan
A1  - Rosenkranz, Alexander R.
A1  - Berlakovich, Gabriela
A1  - Ysebaert, Dirk
A1  - Knops, Noël
A1  - Kuypers, Dirk
A1  - Weekers, Laurent
A1  - Muehlfeld, Anja
A1  - Rump, Lars‐Christian
A1  - Hauser, Ingeborg
A1  - Pisarski, Przemyslaw
A1  - Weimer, Rolf
A1  - Fornara, Paolo
A1  - Fischer, Lutz
A1  - Kliem, Volker
A1  - Sester, Urban
A1  - Stippel, Dirk
A1  - Arns, Wolfgang
A1  - Hau, Hans‐Michael
A1  - Nitschke, Martin
A1  - Hoyer, Joachim
A1  - Thorban, Stefan
A1  - Weinmann‐Menke, Julia
A1  - Heller, Katharina
A1  - Banas, Bernhard
A1  - Schwenger, Vedat
A1  - Nadalin, Silvio
A1  - Lopau, Kai
A1  - Hüser, Norbert
A1  - Heemann, Uwe
T1  - Repeated kidney re‐transplantation—the Eurotransplant experience: a retrospective multicenter outcome analysis
JF  - Transplant International
N2  - In Eurotransplant kidney allocation system (ETKAS), candidates can be considered unlimitedly for repeated re‐transplantation. Data on outcome and benefit are indeterminate. We performed a retrospective 15‐year patient and graft outcome data analysis from 1464 recipients of a third or fourth or higher sequential deceased donor renal transplantation (DDRT) from 42 transplant centers. Repeated re‐DDRT recipients were younger (mean 43.0 vs. 50.2 years) compared to first DDRT recipients. They received grafts with more favorable HLA matches (89.0% vs. 84.5%) but thereby no statistically significant improvement of patient and graft outcome was found as comparatively demonstrated in 1st DDRT. In the multivariate modeling accounting for confounding factors, mortality and graft loss after 3rd and ≥4th DDRT (P < 0.001 each) and death with functioning graft (DwFG) after 3rd DDRT (P = 0.001) were higher as compared to 1st DDRT. The incidence of primary nonfunction (PNF) was also significantly higher in re‐DDRT (12.7%) than in 1st DDRT (7.1%; P < 0.001). Facing organ shortage, increasing waiting time, and considerable mortality on dialysis, we question the current policy of repeated re‐DDRT. The data from this survey propose better HLA matching in first DDRT and second DDRT and careful selection of candidates, especially for ≥4th DDRT.
KW  - allocation
KW  - child
KW  - fourth
KW  - graft
KW  - kidney
KW  - loss
KW  - repeated
KW  - re‐transplantation
KW  - survival
KW  - third
Y1  - 2020
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-214161
VL  - 33
IS  - 6
SP  - 617
EP  - 631
ER  -