TY - JOUR A1 - Gessler, Florian A1 - Lehmann, Felix A1 - Bösel, Julian A1 - Fuhrer, Hannah A1 - Neugebauer, Hermann A1 - Wartenberg, Katja E. A1 - Wolf, Stefan A1 - Bernstock, Joshua D. A1 - Niesen, Wolf-Dirk A1 - Schuss, Patrick T1 - Triage and Allocation of Neurocritical Care Resources During the COVID 19 Pandemic - A National Survey JF - Frontiers in Neurology N2 - Objective: In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the associated hospitalization of an overwhelming number of ventilator-dependent patients, medical and/or ethical patient triage paradigms have become essential. While guidelines on the allocation of scarce resources do exist, such work within the subdisciplines of intensive care (e.g., neurocritical care) remains limited. Methods: A 16-item questionnaire was developed that sought to explore/quantify the expert opinions of German neurointensivists with regard to triage decisions. The anonymous survey was conducted via a web-based platform and in total, 96 members of the Initiative of German Neurointensive Trial Engagement (IGNITE)-study group were contacted via e-mail. The IGNITE consortium consists of an interdisciplinary panel of specialists with expertise in neuro-critical care (i.e., anesthetists, neurologists and neurosurgeons). Results: Fifty members of the IGNITE consortium responded to the questionnaire; in total the respondents were in charge of more than 500 Neuro ICU beds throughout Germany. Common determinants reported which affected triage decisions included known patient wishes (98%), the state of health before admission (96%), SOFA-score (85%) and patient age (69%). Interestingly, other principles of allocation, such as a treatment of “youngest first” (61%) and members of the healthcare sector (50%) were also noted. While these were the most accepted parameters affecting the triage of patients, a “first-come, first-served” principle appeared to be more accepted than a lottery for the allocation of ICU beds which contradicts much of what has been reported within the literature. The respondents also felt that at least one neurointensivist should serve on any interdisciplinary triage team. Conclusions: The data gathered in the context of this survey reveal the estimation/perception of triage algorithms among neurointensive care specialists facing COVID-19. Further, it is apparent that German neurointensivists strongly feel that they should be involved in any triage decisions at an institutional level given the unique resources needed to treat patients within the Neuro ICU. KW - COVID-19 KW - SARS-CoV KW - pandemic KW - patient triage KW - neurocritical care Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-221593 SN - 1664-2295 VL - 11 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schmidbauer, Moritz L. A1 - Ferse, Caroline A1 - Salih, Farid A1 - Klingner, Carsten A1 - Musleh, Rita A1 - Kunst, Stefan A1 - Wittstock, Matthias A1 - Neumann, Bernhard A1 - Schebesch, Karl-Michael A1 - Bösel, Julian A1 - Godau, Jana A1 - Lochner, Piergiorgio A1 - Adam, Elisabeth H. A1 - Jahnke, Kolja A1 - Knier, Benjamin A1 - Schirotzek, Ingo A1 - Müllges, Wolfgang A1 - Notz, Quirin A1 - Dengl, Markus A1 - Güldner, Andreas A1 - Onur, Oezguer A. A1 - Garcia Borrega, Jorge A1 - Dimitriadis, Konstantinos A1 - Günther, Albrecht T1 - COVID-19 and intracranial hemorrhage: a multicenter case series, systematic review and pooled analysis JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine N2 - Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) profoundly impacts hemostasis and microvasculature. In the light of the dilemma between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, in the present paper, we systematically investigate the prevalence, mortality, radiological subtypes, and clinical characteristics of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we performed a systematic review of the literature by screening the PubMed database and included patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and concomitant ICH. We performed a pooled analysis, including a prospectively collected cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients with ICH, as part of the PANDEMIC registry (Pooled Analysis of Neurologic Disorders Manifesting in Intensive Care of COVID-19). Results: Our literature review revealed a total of 217 citations. After the selection process, 79 studies and a total of 477 patients were included. The median age was 58.8 years. A total of 23.3% of patients experienced the critical stage of COVID-19, 62.7% of patients were on anticoagulation and 27.5% of the patients received ECMO. The prevalence of ICH was at 0.85% and the mortality at 52.18%, respectively. Conclusion: ICH in COVID-19 patients is rare, but it has a very poor prognosis. Different subtypes of ICH seen in COVID-19, support the assumption of heterogeneous and multifaceted pathomechanisms contributing to ICH in COVID-19. Further clinical and pathophysiological investigations are warranted to resolve the conflict between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in the future. KW - COVID-19 KW - intracranial hemorrhage KW - prognosis KW - anticoagulation Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-255236 SN - 2077-0383 VL - 11 IS - 3 ER -