TY - JOUR A1 - Tsiligianni, Ioanna G. A1 - Alma, Harma J. A1 - Kocks, Janwillem W. H. A1 - de Jong, Corina A1 - Jelusic, Danijel A1 - Wittmann, Michael A1 - Schuler, Michael A1 - Schultz, Konrad A1 - Kollen, Boudewijn J. A1 - van der Molen, Thys T1 - Investigating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire, COPD Assessment Test, and Modified Medical Research Council scale according to GOLD using St George's Respiratory Questionnaire cutoff 25 (and 20) as reference JF - International Journal of COPD N2 - Background: In the GOLD (Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) strategy document, the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), or modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale are recommended for the assessment of symptoms using the cutoff points of CCQ ≥1, CAT ≥10, and mMRC scale ≥2 to indicate symptomatic patients. The current study investigates the criterion validity of the CCQ, CAT and mMRC scale based on a reference cutoff point of St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) ≥25, as suggested by GOLD, following sensitivity and specificity analysis. In addition, areas under the curve (AUCs) of the CCQ, CAT, and mMRC scale were compared using two SGRQ cutoff points (≥25 and ≥20). Materials and methods: Two data sets were used: study A, 238 patients from a pulmonary rehabilitation program; and study B, 101 patients from primary care. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the correspondence between the recommended cutoff points of the questionnaires. Results: Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC scores for cutoff point SGRQ ≥25 were: study A, 0.99, 0.43, and 0.96 for CCQ ≥1, 0.92, 0.48, and 0.89 for CAT ≥10, and 0.68, 0.91, and 0.91 for mMRC ≥2; study B, 0.87, 0.77, and 0.9 for CCQ ≥1, 0.76, 0.73, and 0.82 for CAT ≥10, and 0.21, 1, and 0.81 for mMRC ≥2. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC scores for cutoff point SGRQ ≥20 were: study A, 0.99, 0.73, and 0.99 for CCQ ≥1, 0.91, 0.73, and 0.94 for CAT ≥10, and 0.66, 0.95, and 0.94 for mMRC ≥2; study B, 0.8, 0.89, and 0.89 for CCQ ≥1, 0.69, 0.78, and 0.8 for CAT ≥10, and 0.18, 1, and 0.81 for mMRC ≥2. Conclusion: Based on data from these two different samples, this study showed that the suggested cutoff point for the SGRQ (≥25) did not seem to correspond well with the established cutoff points of the CCQ or CAT scales, resulting in low specificity levels. The correspondence with the mMRC scale seemed satisfactory, though not optimal. The SGRQ threshold of ≥20 corresponded slightly better than SGRQ ≥25, recently suggested by GOLD 2015, with the established cutoff points for the CCQ, CAT, and mMRC scale. KW - pulmonary disease KW - chronic obstructive KW - health status Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-165427 VL - 11 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Alma, Harma A1 - de Jong, Corina A1 - Jelusic, Danijel A1 - Wittmann, Michael A1 - Schuler, Michael A1 - Flokstra-de Blok, Bertine A1 - Kocks, Janwillem A1 - Schultz, Konrad A1 - van der Molen, Thys T1 - Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference JF - npj Primary Care Respiration Medicine N2 - The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) defines to what extent change on a health status instrument is clinically relevant, which aids scientists and physicians in measuring therapy effects. This is the first study that aimed to establish the MCID of the Clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Questionnaire (CCQ), the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) in the same pulmonary rehabilitation population using multiple approaches. In total, 451 COPD patients participated in a 3-week Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) programme (58 years, 65% male, 43 pack-years, GOLD stage II/III/IV 50/39/11%). Techniques used to assess the MCID were anchor-based approaches, including patient-referencing, criterion-referencing and questionnaire-referencing, and the distribution-based methods standard error of measurement (SEM), 1.96SEM and half standard deviation (0.5s.d.). Patient- and criterion-referencing led to MCID estimates of 0.56 and 0.62 (CCQ); 3.12 and 2.96 (CAT); and 8.40 and 9.28 (SGRQ). Questionnaire-referencing suggested MCID ranges of 0.28–0.61 (CCQ), 1.46–3.08 (CAT) and 6.86–9.47 (SGRQ). The SEM, 1.96SEM and 0.5s.d. were 0.29, 0.56 and 0.46 (CCQ); 3.28, 6.43 and 2.80 (CAT); 5.20, 10.19 and 6.06 (SGRQ). Pooled estimates were 0.52 (CCQ), 3.29 (CAT) and 7.91 (SGRQ) for improvement. MCID estimates differed depending on the method used. Pooled estimates suggest clinically relevant improvements needing to exceed 0.40 on the CCQ, 3.00 on the CAT and 7.00 on the SGRQ for moderate to very severe COPD patients. The MCIDs of the CAT and SGRQ in the literature might be too low, leading to overestimation of treatment effects for patients with COPD. KW - COPD KW - rehabilitation KW - health status instruments Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-166327 VL - 26 IS - 16041 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hayden, Markus C. A1 - Limbach, Matthias A1 - Schuler, Michael A1 - Merkl, Steffen A1 - Schwarzl, Gabriele A1 - Jakab, Katalin A1 - Nowak, Dennis A1 - Schultz, Konrad T1 - Effectiveness of a three-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program for patients after COVID-19: a prospective observational study JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health N2 - For COVID-19 patients who remain symptomatic after the acute phase, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended. However, only a few studies have investigated the effectiveness of PR, especially considering the duration between the acute phase of COVID-19 and the onset of rehabilitation, as well as the initial severity. This prospective observational study evaluated the efficacy of PR in patients after COVID-19. A total of 120 still-symptomatic patients referred for PR after overcoming acute COVID-19 were asked to participate, of whom 108 (mean age 55.6 ± 10.1 years, 45.4% female) consented. The patients were assigned to three groups according to the time of referral and initial disease severity (severe acute; severe after interval; mild after interval). The primary outcome was dyspnea. Secondary outcomes included other respiratory disease symptoms, physical capacity, lung function, fatigue, quality of life (QoL), depression, and anxiety. Furthermore, patients rated the overall effectiveness of PR and their subjective change in health status. At the end of PR, we detected improvements with large effect sizes in exertional dyspnea, physical capacity, QoL, fatigue, and depression in the overall group. Other parameters changed with small to medium effect sizes. PR was effective after acute COVID-19 in all three groups analyzed. KW - COVID-19 KW - pulmonary rehabilitation KW - course of recovery KW - inpatient rehabilitation Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-245170 SN - 1660-4601 VL - 18 IS - 17 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schwaab, Bernhard A1 - Bjarnason-Wehrens, Birna A1 - Meng, Karin A1 - Albus, Christian A1 - Salzwedel, Annett A1 - Schmid, Jean-Paul A1 - Benzer, Werner A1 - Metz, Matthes A1 - Jensen, Katrin A1 - Rauch, Bernhard A1 - Bönner, Gerd A1 - Brzoska, Patrick A1 - Buhr-Schinner, Heike A1 - Charrier, Albrecht A1 - Cordes, Carsten A1 - Dörr, Gesine A1 - Eichler, Sarah A1 - Exner, Anne-Kathrin A1 - Fromm, Bernd A1 - Gielen, Stephan A1 - Glatz, Johannes A1 - Gohlke, Helmut A1 - Grilli, Maurizio A1 - Gysan, Detlef A1 - Härtel, Ursula A1 - Hahmann, Harry A1 - Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph A1 - Karger, Gabriele A1 - Karoff, Marthin A1 - Kiwus, Ulrich A1 - Knoglinger, Ernst A1 - Krusch, Christian-Wolfgang A1 - Langheim, Eike A1 - Mann, Johannes A1 - Max, Regina A1 - Metzendorf, Maria-Inti A1 - Nebel, Roland A1 - Niebauer, Josef A1 - Predel, Hans-Georg A1 - Preßler, Axel A1 - Razum, Oliver A1 - Reiss, Nils A1 - Saure, Daniel A1 - von Schacky, Clemens A1 - Schütt, Morten A1 - Schultz, Konrad A1 - Skoda, Eva-Maria A1 - Steube, Diethard A1 - Streibelt, Marco A1 - Stüttgen, Martin A1 - Stüttgen, Michaela A1 - Teufel, Martin A1 - Tschanz, Hansueli A1 - Völler, Heinz A1 - Vogel, Heiner A1 - Westphal, Ronja T1 - Cardiac rehabilitation in German speaking countries of Europe — evidence-based guidelines from Germany, Austria and Switzerland LLKardReha-DACH — part 2 JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine N2 - Background: Scientific guidelines have been developed to update and harmonize exercise based cardiac rehabilitation (ebCR) in German speaking countries. Key recommendations for ebCR indications have recently been published in part 1 of this journal. The present part 2 updates the evidence with respect to contents and delivery of ebCR in clinical practice, focusing on exercise training (ET), psychological interventions (PI), patient education (PE). In addition, special patients' groups and new developments, such as telemedical (Tele) or home-based ebCR, are discussed as well. Methods: Generation of evidence and search of literature have been described in part 1. Results: Well documented evidence confirms the prognostic significance of ET in patients with coronary artery disease. Positive clinical effects of ET are described in patients with congestive heart failure, heart valve surgery or intervention, adults with congenital heart disease, and peripheral arterial disease. Specific recommendations for risk stratification and adequate exercise prescription for continuous-, interval-, and strength training are given in detail. PI when added to ebCR did not show significant positive effects in general. There was a positive trend towards reduction in depressive symptoms for “distress management” and “lifestyle changes”. PE is able to increase patients’ knowledge and motivation, as well as behavior changes, regarding physical activity, dietary habits, and smoking cessation. The evidence for distinct ebCR programs in special patients’ groups is less clear. Studies on Tele-CR predominantly included low-risk patients. Hence, it is questionable, whether clinical results derived from studies in conventional ebCR may be transferred to Tele-CR. Conclusions: ET is the cornerstone of ebCR. Additional PI should be included, adjusted to the needs of the individual patient. PE is able to promote patients self-management, empowerment, and motivation. Diversity-sensitive structures should be established to interact with the needs of special patient groups and gender issues. Tele-CR should be further investigated as a valuable tool to implement ebCR more widely and effectively. KW - cardiac rehabilitation KW - scientific guidelines KW - secondary prevention KW - physical activity KW - exercise training KW - psychological interventions KW - education KW - gender KW - frailty KW - migration KW - old patients KW - young patients KW - tele-medicine KW - home-based-rehabilitation Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-242645 SN - 2077-0383 VL - 10 IS - 14 ER -