TY  - JOUR
A1  - Vollmuth, Christoph
A1  - Muljukov, Olga
A1  - Abu-Mugheisib, Mazen
A1  - Angermeier, Anselm
A1  - Barlinn, Jessica
A1  - Busetto, Loraine
A1  - Grau, Armin J.
A1  - Günther, Albrecht
A1  - Gumbinger, Christoph
A1  - Hubert, Nikolai
A1  - Hüttemann, Katrin
A1  - Klingner, Carsten
A1  - Naumann, Markus
A1  - Palm, Frederick
A1  - Remi, Jan
A1  - Rücker, Viktoria
A1  - Schessl, Joachim
A1  - Schlachetzki, Felix
A1  - Schuppner, Ramona
A1  - Schwab, Stefan
A1  - Schwartz, Andreas
A1  - Trommer, Adrian
A1  - Urbanek, Christian
A1  - Volbers, Bastian
A1  - Weber, Joachim
A1  - Wojciechowski, Claudia
A1  - Worthmann, Hans
A1  - Zickler, Philipp
A1  - Heuschmann, Peter U.
A1  - Haeusler, Karl Georg
A1  - Hubert, Gordian Jan
T1  - Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on stroke teleconsultations in Germany in the first half of 2020
JF  - European Journal of Neurology
N2  - Background and purpose
The effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on telemedical care have not been described on a national level. Thus, we investigated the medical stroke treatment situation before, during, and after the first lockdown in Germany.

Methods
In this nationwide, multicenter study, data from 14 telemedical networks including 31 network centers and 155 spoke hospitals covering large parts of Germany were analyzed regarding patients' characteristics, stroke type/severity, and acute stroke treatment. A survey focusing on potential shortcomings of in-hospital and (telemedical) stroke care during the pandemic was conducted.

Results
Between January 2018 and June 2020, 67,033 telemedical consultations and 38,895 telemedical stroke consultations were conducted. A significant decline of telemedical (p < 0.001) and telemedical stroke consultations (p < 0.001) during the lockdown in March/April 2020 and a reciprocal increase after relaxation of COVID-19 measures in May/June 2020 were observed. Compared to 2018–2019, neither stroke patients' age (p = 0.38), gender (p = 0.44), nor severity of ischemic stroke (p = 0.32) differed in March/April 2020. Whereas the proportion of ischemic stroke patients for whom endovascular treatment (14.3% vs. 14.6%; p = 0.85) was recommended remained stable, there was a nonsignificant trend toward a lower proportion of recommendation of intravenous thrombolysis during the lockdown (19.0% vs. 22.1%; p = 0.052). Despite the majority of participating network centers treating patients with COVID-19, there were no relevant shortcomings reported regarding in-hospital stroke treatment or telemedical stroke care.

Conclusions
Telemedical stroke care in Germany was able to provide full service despite the COVID-19 pandemic, but telemedical consultations declined abruptly during the lockdown period and normalized after relaxation of COVID-19 measures in Germany.
KW  - COVID-19
KW  - SARS-CoV- 2
KW  - stroke
KW  - telemedicine
KW  - survey
Y1  - 2021
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-259396
VL  - 28
IS  - 10
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Herrmann, Johannes
A1  - Adam, Elisabeth Hannah
A1  - Notz, Quirin
A1  - Helmer, Philipp
A1  - Sonntagbauer, Michael
A1  - Ungemach-Papenberg, Peter
A1  - Sanns, Andreas
A1  - Zausig, York
A1  - Steinfeldt, Thorsten
A1  - Torje, Iuliu
A1  - Schmid, Benedikt
A1  - Schlesinger, Tobias
A1  - Rolfes, Caroline
A1  - Reyher, Christian
A1  - Kredel, Markus
A1  - Stumpner, Jan
A1  - Brack, Alexander
A1  - Wurmb, Thomas
A1  - Gill-Schuster, Daniel
A1  - Kranke, Peter
A1  - Weismann, Dirk
A1  - Klinker, Hartwig
A1  - Heuschmann, Peter
A1  - Rücker, Viktoria
A1  - Frantz, Stefan
A1  - Ertl, Georg
A1  - Muellenbach, Ralf Michael
A1  - Mutlak, Haitham
A1  - Meybohm, Patrick
A1  - Zacharowski, Kai
A1  - Lotz, Christopher
T1  - COVID-19 Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome — A Multicenter Observational Study
JF  - Frontiers in Medicine
N2  - Background: Proportions of patients dying from the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) vary between different countries. We report the characteristics; clinical course and outcome of patients requiring intensive care due to COVID-19 induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Methods: This is a retrospective, observational multicentre study in five German secondary or tertiary care hospitals. All patients consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in any of the participating hospitals between March 12 and May 4, 2020 with a COVID-19 induced ARDS were included.
Results: A total of 106 ICU patients were treated for COVID-19 induced ARDS, whereas severe ARDS was present in the majority of cases. Survival of ICU treatment was 65.0%. Median duration of ICU treatment was 11 days; median duration of mechanical ventilation was 9 days. The majority of ICU treated patients (75.5%) did not receive any antiviral or anti-inflammatory therapies. Venovenous (vv) ECMO was utilized in 16.3%. ICU triage with population-level decision making was not necessary at any time. Univariate analysis associated older age, diabetes mellitus or a higher SOFA score on admission with non-survival during ICU stay.
Conclusions: A high level of care adhering to standard ARDS treatments lead to a good outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients.
KW  - COVID-19
KW  - ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome)
KW  - intensive care medicine
KW  - pandemia
KW  - Germany
Y1  - 2020
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-219834
SN  - 2296-858X
VL  - 7
ER  -