TY  - JOUR
A1  - Thong, Melissa S. Y.
A1  - Doege, Daniela
A1  - Weißer, Linda
A1  - Koch-Gallenkamp, Lena
A1  - Jansen, Lina
A1  - Bertram, Heike
A1  - Eberle, Andrea
A1  - Holleczek, Bernd
A1  - Nennecke, Alice
A1  - Waldmann, Annika
A1  - Zeissig, Sylke Ruth
A1  - Brenner, Hermann
A1  - Arndt, Volker
T1  - Persisting deficits in health-related quality of life of colorectal cancer survivors 14–24 years post-diagnosis: a population-based study
JF  - Current Oncology
N2  - (1) Background: The health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors >10 years post-diagnosis is understudied. We aimed to compare the HRQOL of CRC survivors 14–24 years post-diagnosis to that of age- and sex-matched non-cancer controls, stratified by demographic and clinical factors. (2) Methods: We used data from 506 long-term CRC survivors and 1489 controls recruited from German population-based multi-regional studies. HRQOL was assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire. We estimated differences in the HRQOL of CRC survivors and controls with multiple regression, adjusted for age at survey, sex, and education, where appropriate. (3) Results: CRC survivors reported poorer social functioning but better health status/QOL than controls. CRC survivors, in general, had higher levels of symptom burden, and in particular diarrhea and constipation, regardless of demographic or clinical factors. In stratified analyses, HRQOL differed by age, sex, cancer type, and having a permanent stoma. (4) Conclusions: Although CRC survivors may have a comparable health status/QOL to controls 14–24 years after diagnosis, they still live with persistent bowel dysfunction that can negatively impact aspects of functioning. Healthcare providers should provide timely and adapted follow-up care to ameliorate potential long-term suffering.
KW  - colorectal cancer
KW  - long-term survivors
KW  - health-related quality of life
KW  - population-based
KW  - non-cancer controls
Y1  - 2023
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-311084
SN  - 1718-7729
VL  - 30
IS  - 3
SP  - 3373
EP  - 3390
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Tanoey, Justine
A1  - Baechle, Christina
A1  - Brenner, Hermann
A1  - Deckert, Andreas
A1  - Fricke, Julia
A1  - Günther, Kathrin
A1  - Karch, André
A1  - Keil, Thomas
A1  - Kluttig, Alexander
A1  - Leitzmann, Michael
A1  - Mikolajczyk, Rafael
A1  - Obi, Nadia
A1  - Pischon, Tobias
A1  - Schikowski, Tamara
A1  - Schipf, Sabine M.
A1  - Schulze, Matthias B.
A1  - Sedlmeier, Anja
A1  - Moreno Velásquez, Ilais
A1  - Weber, Katharina S.
A1  - Völzke, Henry
A1  - Ahrens, Wolfgang
A1  - Gastell, Sylvia
A1  - Holleczek, Bernd
A1  - Jöckel, Karl-Heinz
A1  - Katzke, Verena
A1  - Lieb, Wolfgang
A1  - Michels, Karin B.
A1  - Schmidt, Börge
A1  - Teismann, Henning
A1  - Becher, Heiko
T1  - Birth order, Caesarean section, or daycare attendance in relation to child- and adult-onset type 1 diabetes: results from the German National Cohort
JF  - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
N2  - (1) Background: Global incidence of type 1 diabetes (T1D) is rising and nearly half occurred in adults. However, it is unclear if certain early-life childhood T1D risk factors were also associated with adult-onset T1D. This study aimed to assess associations between birth order, delivery mode or daycare attendance and type 1 diabetes (T1D) risk in a population-based cohort and whether these were similar for childhood- and adult-onset T1D (cut-off age 15); (2) Methods: Data were obtained from the German National Cohort (NAKO Gesundheitsstudie) baseline assessment. Self-reported diabetes was classified as T1D if: diagnosis age ≤ 40 years and has been receiving insulin treatment since less than one year after diagnosis. Cox regression was applied for T1D risk analysis; (3) Results: Analyses included 101,411 participants (100 childhood- and 271 adult-onset T1D cases). Compared to “only-children”, HRs for second- or later-born individuals were 0.70 (95% CI = 0.50–0.96) and 0.65 (95% CI = 0.45–0.94), respectively, regardless of parental diabetes, migration background, birth year and perinatal factors. In further analyses, higher birth order reduced T1D risk in children and adults born in recent decades. Caesarean section and daycare attendance showed no clear associations with T1D risk; (4) Conclusions: Birth order should be considered in both children and adults’ T1D risk assessment for early detection.
KW  - perinatal
KW  - adult-onset
KW  - late-onset
KW  - autoimmune
KW  - delivery mode
KW  - sex
KW  - offspring
KW  - NAKO
Y1  - 2022
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-286216
SN  - 1660-4601
VL  - 19
IS  - 17
ER  -