TY - JOUR A1 - Wevrett, Jill A1 - Fenwick, Andrew A1 - Scuffham, James A1 - Johansson, Lena A1 - Gear, Jonathan A1 - Schlögl, Susanne A1 - Segbers, Marcel A1 - Sjögreen-Gleisner, Katarina A1 - Solný, Pavel A1 - Lassmann, Michael A1 - Tipping, Jill A1 - Nisbet, Andrew T1 - Inter-comparison of quantitative imaging of lutetium-177 (\(^{177}\)Lu) in European hospitals JF - EJNMMI Physics N2 - Background This inter-comparison exercise was performed to demonstrate the variability of quantitative SPECT/CT imaging for lutetium-177 (\(^{177}\)Lu) in current clinical practice. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of using international inter-comparison exercises as a means to ensure consistency between clinical sites whilst enabling the sites to use their own choice of quantitative imaging protocols, specific to their systems. Dual-compartment concentric spherical sources of accurately known activity concentrations were prepared and sent to seven European clinical sites. The site staff were not aware of the true volumes or activity within the sources—they performed SPECT/CT imaging of the source, positioned within a water-filled phantom, using their own choice of parameters and reported their estimate of the activities within the source. Results The volumes reported by the participants for the inner section of the source were all within 29% of the true value and within 60% of the true value for the outer section. The activities reported by the participants for the inner section of the source were all within 20% of the true value, whilst those reported for the outer section were up to 83% different to the true value. Conclusions A variety of calibration and segmentation methods were used by the participants for this exercise which demonstrated the variability of quantitative imaging across clinical sites. This paper presents a method to assess consistency between sites using different calibration and segmentation methods. KW - Lutetium KW - Lu-177 KW - SPECT/CT KW - quantitative imaging KW - PRRT KW - molecular radiotherapy Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-233658 VL - 5 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Tran-Gia, Johannes A1 - Denis-Bacelar, Ana M. A1 - Ferreira, Kelley M. A1 - Robinson, Andrew P. A1 - Calvert, Nicholas A1 - Fenwick, Andrew J. A1 - Finocchiaro, Domenico A1 - Fioroni, Federica A1 - Grassi, Elisa A1 - Heetun, Warda A1 - Jewitt, Stephanie J. A1 - Kotzassarlidou, Maria A1 - Ljungberg, Michael A1 - McGowan, Daniel R. A1 - Scott, Nathaniel A1 - Scuffham, James A1 - Gleisner, Katarina Sjögreen A1 - Tipping, Jill A1 - Wevrett, Jill A1 - Lassmann, Michael T1 - A multicentre and multi-national evaluation of the accuracy of quantitative Lu-177 SPECT/CT imaging performed within the MRTDosimetry project JF - EJNMMI Physics N2 - Purpose Patient-specific dosimetry is required to ensure the safety of molecular radiotherapy and to predict response. Dosimetry involves several steps, the first of which is the determination of the activity of the radiopharmaceutical taken up by an organ/lesion over time. As uncertainties propagate along each of the subsequent steps (integration of the time–activity curve, absorbed dose calculation), establishing a reliable activity quantification is essential. The MRTDosimetry project was a European initiative to bring together expertise in metrology and nuclear medicine research, with one main goal of standardizing quantitative \(^{177}\)Lu SPECT/CT imaging based on a calibration protocol developed and tested in a multicentre inter-comparison. This study presents the setup and results of this comparison exercise. Methods The inter-comparison included nine SPECT/CT systems. Each site performed a set of three measurements with the same setup (system, acquisition and reconstruction): (1) Determination of an image calibration for conversion from counts to activity concentration (large cylinder phantom), (2) determination of recovery coefficients for partial volume correction (IEC NEMA PET body phantom with sphere inserts), (3) validation of the established quantitative imaging setup using a 3D printed two-organ phantom (ICRP110-based kidney and spleen). In contrast to previous efforts, traceability of the activity measurement was required for each participant, and all participants were asked to calculate uncertainties for their SPECT-based activities. Results Similar combinations of imaging system and reconstruction lead to similar image calibration factors. The activity ratio results of the anthropomorphic phantom validation demonstrate significant harmonization of quantitative imaging performance between the sites with all sites falling within one standard deviation of the mean values for all inserts. Activity recovery was underestimated for total kidney, spleen, and kidney cortex, while it was overestimated for the medulla. Conclusion This international comparison exercise demonstrates that harmonization of quantitative SPECT/CT is feasible when following very specific instructions of a dedicated calibration protocol, as developed within the MRTDosimetry project. While quantitative imaging performance demonstrates significant harmonization, an over- and underestimation of the activity recovery highlights the limitations of any partial volume correction in the presence of spill-in and spill-out between two adjacent volumes of interests. KW - quantitative SPECT/CT KW - 177Lu SPECT/CT imaging KW - standardization of SPECT/CT imaging KW - harmonization of SPECT/CT imaging KW - international multicenter comparison exercise KW - traceability of SPECT/CT imaging KW - molecular radiotherapy (MRT) KW - 3D printing KW - phantom Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-270380 VL - 8 ER -