TY - JOUR A1 - Mocke, Viola A1 - Weller, Lisa A1 - Frings, Christian A1 - Rothermund, Klaus A1 - Kunde, Wilfried T1 - Task relevance determines binding of effect features in action planning JF - Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics N2 - Action planning can be construed as the temporary binding of features of perceptual action effects. While previous research demonstrated binding for task-relevant, body-related effect features, the role of task-irrelevant or environment-related effect features in action planning is less clear. Here, we studied whether task-relevance or body-relatedness determines feature binding in action planning. Participants planned an action A, but before executing it initiated an intermediate action B. Each action relied on a body-related effect feature (index vs. middle finger movement) and an environment-related effect feature (cursor movement towards vs. away from a reference object). In Experiments 1 and 2, both effects were task-relevant. Performance in action B suffered from partial feature overlap with action A compared to full feature repetition or alternation, which is in line with binding of both features while planning action A. Importantly, this cost disappeared when all features were available but only body-related features were task-relevant (Experiment 3). When only the environment-related effect of action A was known in advance, action B benefitted when it aimed at the same (vs. a different) environment-related effect (Experiment 4). Consequently, the present results support the idea that task relevance determines whether binding of body-related and environment-related effect features takes place while the pre-activation of environment-related features without binding them primes feature-overlapping actions. KW - action planning KW - motor control KW - binding KW - effect anticipations Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-231906 SN - 1943-3921 VL - 82 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Neszmélyi, Bence A1 - Weller, Lisa A1 - Kunde, Wilfried A1 - Pfister, Roland T1 - Social action effects: representing predicted partner responses in social interactions JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience N2 - The sociomotor framework outlines a possible role of social action effects on human action control, suggesting that anticipated partner reactions are a major cue to represent, select, and initiate own body movements. Here, we review studies that elucidate the actual content of social action representations and that explore factors that can distinguish action control processes involving social and inanimate action effects. Specifically, we address two hypotheses on how the social context can influence effect-based action control: first, by providing unique social features such as body-related, anatomical codes, and second, by orienting attention towards any relevant feature dimensions of the action effects. The reviewed empirical work presents a surprisingly mixed picture: while there is indirect evidence for both accounts, previous studies that directly addressed the anatomical account showed no signs of the involvement of genuinely social features in sociomotor action control. Furthermore, several studies show evidence against the differentiation of social and non-social action effect processing, portraying sociomotor action representations as remarkably non-social. A focus on enhancing the social experience in future studies should, therefore, complement the current database to establish whether such settings give rise to the hypothesized influence of social context. KW - motor control KW - action effects KW - action representation KW - sociomotor control KW - ideomotor theory Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-276609 SN - 1662-5161 VL - 16 ER - TY - THES A1 - Weller, Lisa T1 - How to not act? Cognitive foundations of intentional nonactions T1 - Wie handelt man nicht? - Kognitive Grundlagen von intentionalen Nichthandlungen N2 - Human actions are generally not determined by external stimuli, but by internal goals and by the urge to evoke desired effects in the environment. To reach these effects, humans typically have to act. But at times, deciding not to act can be better suited or even the only way to reach a desired effect. What mental processes are involved when people decide not to act to reach certain effects? From the outside it may seem that nothing remarkable is happening, because no action can be observed. However, I present three studies which disclose the cognitive processes that control nonactions. The present experiments address situations where people intentionally decide to omit certain actions in order to produce a predictable effect in the environment. These experiments are based on the ideomotor hypothesis, which suggests that bidirectional associations can be formed between actions and the resulting effects. Because of these associations, anticipating the effects can in turn activate the respective action. The results of the present experiments show that associations can be formed between nonactions (i.e., the intentional decision not to act) and the resulting effects. Due to these associations, perceiving the nonaction effects encourages not acting (Exp. 1–3). What is more, planning a nonaction seems to come with an activation of the effects that inevitably follow the nonaction (Exp. 4–5). These results suggest that the ideomotor hypothesis can be expanded to nonactions and that nonactions are cognitively represented in terms of their sensory effects. Furthermore, nonaction effects can elicit a sense of agency (Exp. 6–8). That is, even though people refrain from acting, the resulting nonaction effects are perceived as self-produced effects. In a nutshell, these findings demonstrate that intentional nonactions include specific mechanisms and processes, which are involved, for instance, in effect anticipation and the sense of agency. This means that, while it may seem that nothing remarkable is happening when people decide not to act, complex processes run on the inside, which are also involved in intentional actions. N2 - Menschliches Verhalten ist im Allgemeinen nicht reizbestimmt, sondern zielgerichtet und hat die Absicht gewünschte Effekte in der Umwelt hervorzurufen. Häufig müssen Menschen eine Handlung ausführen, um diese Effekte zu erreichen. Manche Effekte können allerdings besser oder sogar nur dann erreicht werden, wenn man sich entscheidet nicht zu handeln. Welche mentalen Prozesse finden aber statt, wenn Menschen sich entscheiden nicht zu handeln? Oberflächlich betrachtet scheint es als würde nichts weiter Bemerkenswertes ablaufen, da keine Handlung zu beobachten ist. In drei Experimentalreihen zeige ich aber die kognitiven Prozesse auf, die das Nichthandeln kontrollieren. In den vorliegenden Experimenten werden Situationen untersucht, in denen sich Menschen entscheiden nicht zu handeln, um vorhersehbare Effekte zu erzeugen. Die Experimente basieren auf der ideomotorischen Hypothese, die annimmt, dass bidirektionale Assoziationen zwischen Handlungen und den resultierenden Effekten gebildet werden können. Dadurch kann eine Vorstellung der Effekte wiederum die verbundene Handlung hervorrufen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Assoziationen auch zwischen Nichthandlungen und den daraus resultierenden Effekten gebildet werden können. Diese Assoziationen führen dazu, dass die Wahrnehmung der Effekte selbst die Nichthandlung hervorrufen kann (Exp. 1–3). Außerdem scheint die Planung einer Nichthandlung automatisch eine Vorstellung der assoziierten Effekte zu aktivieren (Exp. 4–5). Diese Befunde legen nahe, dass die ideomotorische Hypothese auch auf Nichthandlungen übertragen werden kann und dass Nichthandlungen kognitiv durch die Effekte, die sie hervorrufen, repräsentiert sind. Darüber hinaus scheinen Menschen ein Verursachungsgefühl (“Sense of Agency”) für die Effekte ihrer Nichthandlungen zu haben (Exp. 6–8). Das bedeutet, dass die resultierenden Effekte (obwohl nicht gehandelt wurde) wie selbsterzeugte Effekte wahrgenommen werden können. Zusammenfassend zeigen die Experimente, dass intentionale Nichthandlungen von spezifischen Mechanismen und Prozessen begleitet werden, die z.B. bei der Effektantizipation und dem Sense of Agency involviert sind. Obwohl es also von außen so scheint, als würde nichts Bemerkenswertes passieren, wenn Menschen intentional nicht handeln, laufen im Inneren komplexe Prozesse ab wie beim intentionalen Handeln. KW - Intention KW - Kognition KW - Ideomotor Theory KW - Sense of Agency KW - Intentional Nonaction KW - Ideomotorik KW - Intentionale Nichthandlung KW - Aktionsforschung KW - Experimentelle Psychologie Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-176678 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schwarz, Katharina A. A1 - Weller, Lisa T1 - Distracted to a fault: attention, actions, and time perception JF - Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics N2 - In the last years, it has become general consensus that actions change our time perception. Performing an action to elicit a specific event seems to lead to a systematic underestimation of the interval between action and effect, a phenomenon termed temporal (or previously intentional) binding. Temporal binding has been closely associated with sense of agency, our perceived control over our actions and our environment, and because of its robust behavioral effects has indeed been widely utilized as an implicit correlate of sense of agency. The most robust and clear temporal binding effects are typically found via Libet clock paradigms. In the present study, we investigate a crucial methodological confound in these paradigms that provides an alternative explanation for temporal binding effects: a redirection of attentional resources in two-event sequences (as in classical operant conditions) versus singular events (as in classical baseline conditions). Our results indicate that binding effects in Libet clock paradigms may be based to a large degree on such attentional processes, irrespective of intention or action-effect sequences. Thus, these findings challenge many of the previously drawn conclusions and interpretations with regard to actions and time perception. KW - attention KW - perception and action KW - temporal processing KW - temporal binding Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324936 VL - 85 IS - 2 ER -