TY  - JOUR
A1  - Lenders, Malte
A1  - Hennermann, Julia B.
A1  - Kurschat, Christine
A1  - Rolfs, Arndt
A1  - Canaan-Kühl, Sima
A1  - Sommer, Claudia
A1  - Üçeyler, Nurcan
A1  - Kampmann, Christoph
A1  - Karabul, Nesrin
A1  - Giese, Anne-Katrin
A1  - Duning, Thomas
A1  - Stypmann, Jörg
A1  - Krämer, Johannes
A1  - Weidemann, Frank
A1  - Brand, Stefan-Martin
A1  - Wanner, Christoph
A1  - Brand, Eva
T1  - Multicenter Female Fabry Study (MFFS) - clinical survey on current treatment of females with Fabry disease
JF  - Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
N2  - Background
The aim of the present study was to assess manifestations of and applied treatment concepts for females with Fabry disease (FD) according to the current European Fabry Guidelines.

Methods
Between 10/2008 and 12/2014, data from the most recent visit of 261 adult female FD patients from six German Fabry centers were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical presentation and laboratory data, including plasma lyso-Gb3 levels were assessed.

Results
Fifty-five percent of females were on enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), according to recent European FD guidelines. Thirty-three percent of females were untreated although criteria for ERT initiation were fulfilled. In general, the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) seemed to impact more on ERT initiation than impaired renal function. In ERT-naïve females RAAS blockers were more often prescribed if LVH was present rather than albuminuria. Affected females with missense mutations showed a similar disease burden compared to females with nonsense mutations. Elevated plasma lyso-Gb3 levels in ERT-naïve females seem to be a marker of disease burden, since patients showed comparable incidences of organ manifestations even if they were ~8 years younger than females with normal lyso-Gb3 levels.

Conclusion
The treatment of the majority of females with FD in Germany is in line with the current European FD guidelines. However, a relevant number of females remain untreated despite organ involvement, necessitating a careful reevaluation of these females.
KW  - Fabry disease
KW  - females
KW  - lyso-Gb3
KW  - enzyme replacement therapy
KW  - guidelines
Y1  - 2016
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-166543
VL  - 11
IS  - 88
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Brumberg, Joachim
A1  - Schröter, Nils
A1  - Blazhenets, Ganna
A1  - Frings, Lars
A1  - Volkmann, Jens
A1  - Lapa, Constantin
A1  - Jost, Wolfgang H.
A1  - Isaias, Ioannis U.
A1  - Meyer, Philipp T.
T1  - Differential diagnosis of parkinsonism: a head-to-head comparison of FDG PET and MIBG scintigraphy
JF  - NPJ Parkinsons Disease
N2  - [\(^{18}\)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET and [\(^{123}\)I]metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy may contribute to the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative parkinsonism. To identify the superior method, we retrospectively evaluated 54 patients with suspected neurodegenerative parkinsonism, who were referred for FDG PET and MIBG scintigraphy. Two investigators visually assessed FDG PET scans using an ordinal 6-step score for disease-specific patterns of Lewy body diseases (LBD) or atypical parkinsonism (APS) and assigned the latter to the subgroups multiple system atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), or corticobasal syndrome. Regions-of-interest analysis on anterior planar MIBG images served to calculate the heart-to-mediastinum ratio. Movement disorder specialists blinded to imaging results established clinical follow-up diagnosis by means of guideline-derived case vignettes. Clinical follow-up (1.7 +/- 2.3 years) revealed the following diagnoses: n = 19 LBD (n = 17 Parkinson's disease [PD], n = 1 PD dementia, and n = 1 dementia with Lewy bodies), n = 31 APS (n = 28 MSA, n = 3 PSP), n = 3 non-neurodegenerative parkinsonism; n = 1 patient could not be diagnosed and was excluded. Receiver operating characteristic analyses for discriminating LBD vs. non-LBD revealed a larger area under the curve for FDG PET than for MIBG scintigraphy at statistical trend level for consensus rating (0.82 vs. 0.69, p = 0.06; significant for investigator #1: 0.83 vs. 0.69, p = 0.04). The analysis of PD vs. MSA showed a similar difference (0.82 vs. 0.69, p = 0.11; rater #1: 0.83 vs. 0.69, p = 0.07). Albeit the notable differences in diagnostic performance did not attain statistical significance, the authors consider this finding clinically relevant and suggest that FDG PET, which also allows for subgrouping of APS, should be preferred.
KW  - clinical diagnosis
KW  - F-18-FDG PET
KW  - disease
KW  - dementia
KW  - accuracy
KW  - stimulation
KW  - guidelines
KW  - criteria
KW  - brain
KW  - risk
Y1  - 2020
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-230675
VL  - 6
ER  -