TY  - JOUR
A1  - Müller, Sophie
A1  - Köhler, Franziska
A1  - Hendricks, Anne
A1  - Kastner, Carolin
A1  - Börner, Kevin
A1  - Diers, Johannes
A1  - Lock, Johan F.
A1  - Petritsch, Bernhard
A1  - Germer, Christoph-Thomas
A1  - Wiegering, Armin
T1  - Brain metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis to establish a guideline for daily treatment
JF  - Cancers
N2  - Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide. Most patients with metastatic CRC develop liver or lung metastases, while a minority suffer from brain metastases. There is little information available regarding the presentation, treatment, and overall survival of brain metastases (BM) from CRC. This systematic review and meta-analysis includes data collected from three major databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase) based on the key words “brain”, “metastas*”, “tumor”, “colorectal”, “cancer”, and “malignancy”. In total, 1318 articles were identified in the search and 86 studies matched the inclusion criteria. The incidence of BM varied between 0.1% and 11.5%. Most patients developed metastases at other sites prior to developing BM. Lung metastases and KRAS mutations were described as risk factors for additional BM. Patients with BM suffered from various symptoms, but up to 96.8% of BM patients were asymptomatic at the time of BM diagnosis. Median survival time ranged from 2 to 9.6 months, and overall survival (OS) increased up to 41.1 months in patients on a multimodal therapy regimen. Several factors including age, blood levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), multiple metastases sites, number of brain lesions, and presence of the KRAS mutation were predictors of OS. For BM diagnosis, MRI was considered to be state of the art. Treatment consisted of a combination of surgery, radiation, or systemic treatment.
KW  - brain metastases
KW  - cerebral metastases
KW  - BM
KW  - colorectal cancer
KW  - CRC
KW  - systematic review
KW  - meta-analysis
Y1  - 2021
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228883
SN  - 2072-6694
VL  - 13
IS  - 4
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Köhler, Franziska
A1  - Hendricks, Anne
A1  - Kastner, Carolin
A1  - Müller, Sophie
A1  - Boerner, Kevin
A1  - Wagner, Johanna C.
A1  - Lock, Johan F.
A1  - Wiegering, Armin
T1  - Laparoscopic appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis-a systematic review
JF  - International Journal of Colorectal Disease
N2  - Background
Over the last years, laparoscopic appendectomy has progressively replaced open appendectomy and become the current gold standard treatment for suspected, uncomplicated appendicitis. At the same time, though, it is an ongoing discussion that antibiotic therapy can be an equivalent treatment for patients with uncomplicated appendicitis. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the safety and efficacy of antibiotic therapy and compare it to the laparoscopic appendectomy for acute, uncomplicated appendicitis.

Methods
The PubMed database, Embase database, and Cochrane library were scanned for studies comparing laparoscopic appendectomy with antibiotic treatment. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection and data extraction. The primary endpoint was defined as successful treatment of appendicitis. Secondary endpoints were pain intensity, duration of hospitalization, absence from work, and incidence of complications.

Results
No studies were found that exclusively compared laparoscopic appendectomy with antibiotic treatment for acute, uncomplicated appendicitis.

Conclusions
To date, there are no studies comparing antibiotic treatment to laparoscopic appendectomy for patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, thus emphasizing the lack of evidence and need for further investigation.
KW  - acute appendicitis
KW  - open appendectomy
KW  - laparoscopic appendectomy
KW  - antibiotics
Y1  - 2021
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-266616
SN  - 1432-1262
VL  - 36
IS  - 10
ER  -