TY - JOUR A1 - Değirmenci, Laura A1 - Rogé Ferreira, Fabio Luiz A1 - Vukosavljevic, Adrian A1 - Heindl, Cornelia A1 - Keller, Alexander A1 - Geiger, Dietmar A1 - Scheiner, Ricarda T1 - Sugar perception in honeybees JF - Frontiers in Physiology N2 - Honeybees (Apis mellifera) need their fine sense of taste to evaluate nectar and pollen sources. Gustatory receptors (Grs) translate taste signals into electrical responses. In vivo experiments have demonstrated collective responses of the whole Gr-set. We here disentangle the contributions of all three honeybee sugar receptors (AmGr1-3), combining CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genetic knock-out, electrophysiology and behaviour. We show an expanded sugar spectrum of the AmGr1 receptor. Mutants lacking AmGr1 have a reduced response to sucrose and glucose but not to fructose. AmGr2 solely acts as co-receptor of AmGr1 but not of AmGr3, as we show by electrophysiology and using bimolecular fluorescence complementation. Our results show for the first time that AmGr2 is indeed a functional receptor on its own. Intriguingly, AmGr2 mutants still display a wildtype-like sugar taste. AmGr3 is a specific fructose receptor and is not modulated by a co-receptor. Eliminating AmGr3 while preserving AmGr1 and AmGr2 abolishes the perception of fructose but not of sucrose. Our comprehensive study on the functions of AmGr1, AmGr2 and AmGr3 in honeybees is the first to combine investigations on sugar perception at the receptor level and simultaneously in vivo. We show that honeybees rely on two gustatory receptors to sense all relevant sugars. KW - AmGr1 KW - AmGr2 KW - AmGr3 KW - sugar responsiveness KW - proboscis extension response (PER) KW - gustatory receptors (Grs) KW - honeybee taste perception Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-302284 SN - 1664-042X VL - 13 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Pamir, Evren A1 - Szyszka, Paul A1 - Scheiner, Ricarda A1 - Nawrot, Martin P. T1 - Rapid learning dynamics in individual honeybees during classical conditioning JF - Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience N2 - Associative learning in insects has been studied extensively by a multitude of classical conditioning protocols. However, so far little emphasis has been put on the dynamics of learning in individuals. The honeybee is a well-established animal model for learning and memory. We here studied associative learning as expressed in individual behavior based on a large collection of data on olfactory classical conditioning (25 datasets, 3298 animals). We show that the group-averaged learning curve and memory retention score confound three attributes of individual learning: the ability or inability to learn a given task, the generally fast acquisition of a conditioned response (CR) in learners, and the high stability of the CR during consecutive training and memory retention trials. We reassessed the prevailing view that more training results in better memory performance and found that 24 h memory retention can be indistinguishable after single-trial and multiple-trial conditioning in individuals. We explain how inter-individual differences in learning can be accommodated within the Rescorla Wagner theory of associative learning. In both data-analysis and modeling we demonstrate how the conflict between population-level and single-animal perspectives on learning and memory can be disentangled. KW - sucrose sensitivity KW - sucrose responsiveness KW - learning curve KW - bees KW - apis mellifera KW - single-trial learning KW - classical conditioning KW - Rescorla-Wagner model KW - proboscis extension response (PER) Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-115365 SN - 1662-5153 VL - 8 IS - 313 ER -