TY - JOUR A1 - Janson, Patrick A1 - Willeke, Kristina A1 - Zaibert, Lisa A1 - Budnick, Andrea A1 - Berghöfer, Anne A1 - Kittel-Schneider, Sarah A1 - Heuschmann, Peter U. A1 - Zapf, Andreas A1 - Wildner, Manfred A1 - Stupp, Carolin A1 - Keil, Thomas T1 - Mortality, morbidity and health-related outcomes in informal caregivers compared to non-caregivers: a systematic review JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health N2 - A systematic overview of mental and physical disorders of informal caregivers based on population-based studies with good methodological quality is lacking. Therefore, our aim was to systematically summarize mortality, incidence, and prevalence estimates of chronic diseases in informal caregivers compared to non-caregivers. Following PRISMA recommendations, we searched major healthcare databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE and Web of Science) systematically for relevant studies published in the last 10 years (without language restrictions) (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020200314). We included only observational cross-sectional and cohort studies with low risk of bias (risk scores 0–2 out of max 8) that reported the prevalence, incidence, odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR), mean- or sum-scores for health-related outcomes in informal caregivers and non-caregivers. For a thorough methodological quality assessment, we used a validated checklist. The synthesis of the results was conducted by grouping outcomes. We included 22 studies, which came predominately from the USA and Europe. Informal caregivers had a significantly lower mortality than non-caregivers. Regarding chronic morbidity outcomes, the results from a large longitudinal German health-insurance evaluation showed increased and statistically significant incidences of severe stress, adjustment disorders, depression, diseases of the spine and pain conditions among informal caregivers compared to non-caregivers. In cross-sectional evaluations, informal caregiving seemed to be associated with a higher occurrence of depression and of anxiety (ranging from 4 to 51% and 2 to 38%, respectively), pain, hypertension, diabetes and reduced quality of life. Results from our systematic review suggest that informal caregiving may be associated with several mental and physical disorders. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution, as the cross-sectional studies cannot determine temporal relationships. The lower mortality rates compared to non-caregivers may be due to a healthy-carer bias in longitudinal observational studies; however, these and other potential benefits of informal caregiving deserve further attention by researchers. KW - cohort studies KW - longitudinal studies KW - cross-sectional studies KW - family caregivers KW - informal caregiving KW - mental health KW - physical health KW - population-based studies KW - systematic review Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-275219 SN - 1660-4601 VL - 19 IS - 10 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Sonnenschein-van der Voort, Agnes M. M. A1 - Arends, Lidia R. A1 - de Jongste, Johan C. A1 - Annesi-Maesano, Isabella A1 - Arshad, S. Hasan A1 - Barros, Henrique A1 - Basterrechea, Mikel A1 - Bisgaard, Hans A1 - Chatzi, Leda A1 - Corpeleijn, Eva A1 - Correia, Sofia A1 - Craig, Leone C. A1 - Devereux, Graham A1 - Dogaru, Cristian A1 - Dostal, Miroslav A1 - Duchen, Karel A1 - Eggesbø, Merete A1 - van der Ent, C. Kors A1 - Fantini, Maria P. A1 - Forastiere, Francesco A1 - Frey, Urs A1 - Gehring, Ulrike A1 - Gori, Davide A1 - van der Gugten, Anne C. A1 - Hanke, Wojciech A1 - Henderson, A. John A1 - Heude, Barbara A1 - Iñiguez, Carmen A1 - Inskip, Hazel M. A1 - Keil, Thomas A1 - Kelleher, Cecily C. A1 - Kogevinas, Manolis A1 - Kreiner-Møller, Eskil A1 - Kuehni, Claudia E. A1 - Küpers, Leanne K. A1 - Lancz, Kinga A1 - Larsen, Pernille S. A1 - Lau, Susanne A1 - Ludvigsson, Johnny A1 - Mommers, Monique A1 - Andersen, Anne-Marie Nybo A1 - Palkovicova, Lubica A1 - Pike, Katherine C. A1 - Pizzi, Constanza A1 - Polanska, Kinga A1 - Porta, Daniela A1 - Richiardi, Lorenzo A1 - Roberts, Graham A1 - Schmidt, Anne A1 - Sram, Radim J. A1 - Sunyer, Jordi A1 - Thijs, Carel A1 - Torrent, Maties A1 - Viljoen, Karien A1 - Wijga, Alet H. A1 - Vrijheid, Martine A1 - Jaddoe, Vincent W. V. A1 - Duijts, Liesbeth T1 - Preterm birth, infant weight gain, and childhood asthma risk: A meta-analysis of 147,000 European children JF - The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology N2 - Background Preterm birth, low birth weight, and infant catch-up growth seem associated with an increased risk of respiratory diseases in later life, but individual studies showed conflicting results. Objectives We performed an individual participant data meta-analysis for 147,252 children of 31 birth cohort studies to determine the associations of birth and infant growth characteristics with the risks of preschool wheezing (1-4 years) and school-age asthma (5-10 years). Methods First, we performed an adjusted 1-stage random-effect meta-analysis to assess the combined associations of gestational age, birth weight, and infant weight gain with childhood asthma. Second, we performed an adjusted 2-stage random-effect meta-analysis to assess the associations of preterm birth (gestational age <37 weeks) and low birth weight (<2500 g) with childhood asthma outcomes. Results Younger gestational age at birth and higher infant weight gain were independently associated with higher risks of preschool wheezing and school-age asthma (P < .05). The inverse associations of birth weight with childhood asthma were explained by gestational age at birth. Compared with term-born children with normal infant weight gain, we observed the highest risks of school-age asthma in children born preterm with high infant weight gain (odds ratio [OR], 4.47; 95% CI, 2.58-7.76). Preterm birth was positively associated with an increased risk of preschool wheezing (pooled odds ratio [pOR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.25-1.43) and school-age asthma (pOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.18-1.67) independent of birth weight. Weaker effect estimates were observed for the associations of low birth weight adjusted for gestational age at birth with preschool wheezing (pOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00-1.21) and school-age asthma (pOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.27). Conclusion Younger gestational age at birth and higher infant weight gain were associated with childhood asthma outcomes. The associations of lower birth weight with childhood asthma were largely explained by gestational age at birth." KW - gestational age KW - low birth weight KW - infant growth KW - wheezing KW - asthma KW - epidemiology KW - cohort studies KW - children Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-120714 VL - 133 IS - 5 ER -