TY - JOUR A1 - Klatt, Björn K. A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Westphal, Catrin A1 - Clough, Yann A1 - Smit, Inga A1 - Pawelzik, Elke A1 - Tscharntke, Teja T1 - Bee pollination improves crop quality, shelf life and commercial value JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences N2 - Pollination improves the yield of most crop species and contributes to one-third of global crop production, but comprehensive benefits including crop quality are still unknown. Hence, pollination is underestimated by international policies, which is particularly alarming in times of agricultural intensification and diminishing pollination services. In this study, exclusion experiments with strawberries showed bee pollination to improve fruit quality, quantity and market value compared with wind and self-pollination. Bee-pollinated fruits were heavier, had less malformations and reached higher commercial grades. They had increased redness and reduced sugar–acid–ratios and were firmer, thus improving the commercially important shelf life. Longer shelf life reduced fruit loss by at least 11%. This is accounting for 0.32 billion US$ of the 1.44 billion US$ provided by bee pollination to the total value of 2.90 billion US$ made with strawberry selling in the European Union 2009. The fruit quality and yield effects are driven by the pollination-mediated production of hormonal growth regulators, which occur in several pollination-dependent crops. Thus, our comprehensive findings should be transferable to a wide range of crops and demonstrate bee pollination to be a hitherto underestimated but vital and economically important determinant of fruit quality. KW - commercial grades KW - ecosystem services KW - post-harvest quality KW - shelf life KW - strawberry KW - crop yield KW - ecology Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-120797 VL - 281 IS - 1775 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kleijn, David A1 - Winfree, Rachael A1 - Bartomeus, Ignasi A1 - Carvalheiro, Luísa G. A1 - Henry, Mickael A1 - Isaacs, Rufus A1 - Klein, Alexandra-Maria A1 - Kremen, Claire A1 - M'Gonigle, Leithen K. A1 - Rader, Romina A1 - Ricketts, Taylor H. A1 - Williams, Neal M. A1 - Adamson, Nancy Lee A1 - Ascher, John S. A1 - Báldi, András A1 - Batáry, Péter A1 - Benjamin, Faye A1 - Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. A1 - Blitzer, Eleanor J. A1 - Bommarco, Riccardo A1 - Brand, Mariette R. A1 - Bretagnolle, Vincent A1 - Button, Lindsey A1 - Cariveau, Daniel P. A1 - Chifflet, Rémy A1 - Colville, Jonathan F. A1 - Danforth, Bryan N. A1 - Elle, Elizabeth A1 - Garratt, Michael P. D. A1 - Herzog, Felix A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Howlett, Brad G. A1 - Jauker, Frank A1 - Jha, Shalene A1 - Knop, Eva A1 - Krewenka, Kristin M. A1 - Le Féon, Violette A1 - Mandelik, Yael A1 - May, Emily A. A1 - Park, Mia G. A1 - Pisanty, Gideon A1 - Reemer, Menno A1 - Riedinger, Verena A1 - Rollin, Orianne A1 - Rundlöf, Maj A1 - Sardiñas, Hillary S. A1 - Scheper, Jeroen A1 - Sciligo, Amber R. A1 - Smith, Henrik G. A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf A1 - Thorp, Robbin A1 - Tscharntke, Teja A1 - Verhulst, Jort A1 - Viana, Blandina F. A1 - Vaissière, Bernard E. A1 - Veldtman, Ruan A1 - Ward, Kimiora L. A1 - Westphal, Catrin A1 - Potts, Simon G. T1 - Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation JF - Nature Communications N2 - There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost- effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost- effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments. KW - ecosystem services KW - european countries KW - abundance KW - native bees KW - biodiversity conservation KW - plant diversity KW - fruit set KW - productivity KW - decline KW - pollen Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-151879 VL - 6 IS - 7414 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Krimmer, Elena A1 - Martin, Emily A. A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Krauss, Jochen A1 - Steffan‐Dewenter, Ingolf T1 - Flower fields and pesticide use interactively shape pollen beetle infestation and parasitism in oilseed rape fields JF - Journal of Applied Ecology N2 - Pollen beetles (Brassicogethes spp.) are the main pests of oilseed rape (OSR, Brassica napus) in Europe and responsible for massive yield losses. Upcoming pesticide resistances highlight the need for other means of crop protection, such as natural pest control. Sown flower fields aim to counteract the decrease of insect biodiversity in agricultural landscapes by providing resources to ecosystem service providers. However, the optimal age and size of flower fields to increase natural pest control is still unclear. We conducted experiments on 31 OSR fields located along a gradient of landscape-scale semi-natural habitat (SNH). OSR fields were located adjacent to flower fields which differed in age, continuity and size, or adjacent to crop fields or calcareous grasslands. Pesticide-free areas were established to examine interactive effects of pesticide use and flower field characteristics. The abundance of pollen beetle adults and larvae, parasitism and superparasitism rates in OSR were recorded at increasing distances to the adjacent sites. Flower fields and calcareous grasslands increased pollen beetle parasitism when compared to OSR fields neighbouring crop fields. The threshold for effective natural pest control of 35% could be reached in the pesticide-free areas of OSR fields adjacent to calcareous grasslands and flower fields maintained continuously for at least 6 years. In pesticide-sprayed areas, pollen beetle parasitism and superparasitism declined with increasing distance to the adjacent field. Furthermore, flower fields larger than 1.5 ha were able to improve pollen beetle parasitism more than smaller fields. Synthesis and applications. To promote natural pest control in oilseed rape (OSR), large flower fields should be maintained for several years, to create stable habitats for natural enemies. The continuous maintenance of flower fields should be preferred, as ploughing and resowing after 5–6 years decreased the positive effects of the flower fields on natural pest control in adjacent OSR fields. However, pesticide use can abrogate positive effects of flower fields on pollen beetle parasitism. This study highlights that sown flower fields have the potential to increase natural pest control in OSR, but this potential is depending on its age, continuity and size and can be hindered by pesticide use. KW - agri-environment scheme KW - sown flower field age and size KW - oilseed rape KW - natural pest control KW - ecosystem services KW - distance-decay function KW - Brassicogethes spp. Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-258037 VL - 59 IS - 1 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Dainese, Matteo A1 - Gonzalez-Varo, Juan P. A1 - Mudri-Stojnic, Sonja A1 - Riedinger, Verena A1 - Rundlöf, Maj A1 - Scheper, Jeroen A1 - Wickens, Jennifer B. A1 - Wickens, Victoria J. A1 - Bommarco, Riccardo A1 - Kleijn, David A1 - Potts, Simon G. A1 - Roberts, Stuart P. M. A1 - Smith, Henrik G. A1 - Vilà, Montserrat A1 - Vujic, Ante A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf T1 - Mass-flowering crops dilute pollinator abundance in agricultural landscapes across Europe JF - Ecology Letters N2 - Mass-flowering crops (MFCs) are increasingly cultivated and might influence pollinator communities in MFC fields and nearby semi-natural habitats (SNHs). Across six European regions and 2 years, we assessed how landscape-scale cover of MFCs affected pollinator densities in 408 MFC fields and adjacent SNHs. In MFC fields, densities of bumblebees, solitary bees, managed honeybees and hoverflies were negatively related to the cover of MFCs in the landscape. In SNHs, densities of bumblebees declined with increasing cover of MFCs but densities of honeybees increased. The densities of all pollinators were generally unrelated to the cover of SNHs in the landscape. Although MFC fields apparently attracted pollinators from SNHs, in landscapes with large areas of MFCs they became diluted. The resulting lower densities might negatively affect yields of pollinator- dependent crops and the reproductive success of wild plants. An expansion of MFCs needs to be accompanied by pollinator-supporting practices in agricultural landscapes. KW - wild plant pollination KW - Colony growth KW - Densities KW - Context KW - crop pollination KW - Oilseed rape KW - Nesting resources KW - Bee abundance KW - Yield KW - Richness KW - Habitats KW - Agricultural intensification KW - agri-environment schemes KW - biofuels KW - ecosystem services KW - field boundaries KW - landscape compositionv KW - non-crop habitats KW - semi-natural habitats KW - spillover Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-187356 VL - 19 IS - 10 ER -