TY  - JOUR
A1  - Serfling, Sebastian E.
A1  - Lapa, Constantin
A1  - Dreher, Niklas
A1  - Hartrampf, Philipp E.
A1  - Rowe, Steven P.
A1  - Higuchi, Takahiro
A1  - Schirbel, Andreas
A1  - Weich, Alexander
A1  - Hahner, Stefanie
A1  - Fassnacht, Martin
A1  - Buck, Andreas K.
A1  - Werner, Rudolf A.
T1  - Impact of tumor burden on normal organ distribution in patients imaged with CXCR4-targeted [\(^{68}\)Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT
JF  - Molecular Imaging and Biology
N2  - Background
CXCR4-directed positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been used as a diagnostic tool in patients with solid tumors. We aimed to determine a potential correlation between tumor burden and radiotracer accumulation in normal organs.

Methods
Ninety patients with histologically proven solid cancers underwent CXCR4-targeted [\(^{68}\)Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were placed in normal organs (heart, liver, spleen, bone marrow, and kidneys) and tumor lesions. Mean standardized uptake values (SUV\(_{mean}\)) for normal organs were determined. For CXCR4-positive tumor burden, maximum SUV (SUV\(_{max}\)), tumor volume (TV), and fractional tumor activity (FTA, defined as SUV\(_{mean}\) x TV), were calculated. We used a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ) to derive correlative indices between normal organ uptake and tumor burden.

Results
Median SUV\(_{mean}\) in unaffected organs was 5.2 for the spleen (range, 2.44 – 10.55), 3.27 for the kidneys (range, 1.52 – 17.4), followed by bone marrow (1.76, range, 0.84 – 3.98), heart (1.66, range, 0.88 – 2.89), and liver (1.28, range, 0.73 – 2.45). No significant correlation between SUV\(_{max}\) in tumor lesions (ρ ≤ 0.189, P ≥ 0.07), TV (ρ ≥ -0.204, P ≥ 0.06) or FTA (ρ ≥ -0.142, P ≥ 0.18) with the investigated organs was found.

Conclusions
In patients with solid tumors imaged with [\(^{68}\)Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT, no relevant tumor sink effect was noted. This observation may be of relevance for therapies with radioactive and non-radioactive CXCR4-directed drugs, as with increasing tumor burden, the dose to normal organs may remain unchanged.
KW  - CXCR4
KW  - C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4
KW  - PET
KW  - [68Ga]PentixaFor
KW  - [177Lu]/[90Y]PentixaTher
KW  - theranostics
KW  - endoradiotherapy
Y1  - 2022
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324622
VL  - 24
IS  - 4
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Werner, Rudolf A.
A1  - Bundschuh, Ralph A.
A1  - Bundschuh, Lena
A1  - Javadi, Mehrbod S.
A1  - Higuchi, Takahiro
A1  - Weich, Alexander
A1  - Sheikhbahaei, Sara
A1  - Pienta, Kenneth J.
A1  - Buck, Andreas K.
A1  - Pomper, Martin G.
A1  - Gorin, Michael A.
A1  - Lapa, Constantin
A1  - Rowe, Steven P.
T1  - MI-RADS: Molecular Imaging Reporting and Data Systems – A Generalizable Framework for Targeted Radiotracers with Theranostic Implications
JF  - Annals of Nuclear Medicine
N2  - Both prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)- and somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agents for staging and restaging of prostate carcinoma or neuroendocrine tumors, respectively, are seeing rapidly expanding use. In addition to diagnostic applications, both classes of radiotracers can be used to triage patients for theranostic endoradiotherapy. While interpreting PSMA- or SSTR-targeted PET/computed tomography (CT) scans, the reader has to be aware of certain pitfalls. Adding to the complexity of the interpretation of those imaging agents, both normal biodistribution, and also false-positive and -negative findings differ between PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET radiotracers. Herein summarized under the umbrella term molecular imaging reporting and data systems (MI-RADS), two novel RADS classifications for PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET imaging are described (PSMA- and SSTR-RADS). Both framework systems may contribute to increase the level of a reader’s confidence and to navigate the imaging interpreter through indeterminate lesions, so that appropriate workup for equivocal findings can be pursued. Notably, PSMA- and SSTR-RADS are structured in a reciprocal fashion, i.e. if the reader is familiar with one system, the other system can readily be applied as well. In the present review we will discuss the most common pitfalls on PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET/CT, briefly introduce PSMA- and SSTR-RADS, and define a future role of the umbrella framework MI-RADS compared to other harmonization systems.
KW  - PET
KW  - Positronen-Emissions-Tomografie
KW  - prostate cancer
KW  - neuroendocrine tumor
KW  - prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)
KW  - somatostatin receptor (SSTR)
KW  - positron emission tomography
KW  - theranostics
KW  - standardization
KW  - RADS
KW  - reporting and data systems
KW  - personalized medicine
Y1  - 2018
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-166995
SN  - 0914-7187
ER  -