TY - JOUR A1 - Reimer, Stanislaus A1 - Lock, Johan F. A1 - Flemming, Sven A1 - Weich, Alexander A1 - Widder, Anna A1 - Plaßmeier, Lars A1 - Döring, Anna A1 - Hering, Ilona A1 - Hankir, Mohammed K. A1 - Meining, Alexander A1 - Germer, Christoph-Thomas A1 - Groneberg, Kaja A1 - Seyfried, Florian T1 - Endoscopic management of large leakages after upper gastrointestinal surgery JF - Frontiers in Surgery N2 - Background Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is an evidence-based option to treat anastomotic leakages of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, but the technical challenges and clinical outcomes of patients with large defects remain poorly described. Methods All patients with leakages of the upper GI tract that were treated with endoscopic negative pressure therapy at our institution from 2012–2021 were analyzed. Patients with large defects (>30 mm) as an indicator of complex treatment were compared to patients with smaller defects (control group). Results Ninety-two patients with postoperative anastomotic or staplerline leakages were identified, of whom 20 (21.7%) had large defects. Compared to the control group, these patients required prolonged therapy (42 vs. 14 days, p < 0.001) and hospital stay (63 vs. 26 days, p < 0.001) and developed significantly more septic complications (40 vs. 17.6%, p = 0.027.) which often necessitated additional endoscopic and/or surgical/interventional treatments (45 vs. 17.4%, p = 0.007.) Nevertheless, a resolution of leakages was achieved in 80% of patients with large defects, which was similar compared to the control group (p = 0.42). Multiple leakages, especially on the opposite side, along with other local unfavorable conditions, such as foreign material mass, limited access to the defect or extensive necrosis occurred significantly more often in cases with large defects (p < 0.001). Conclusions Overall, our study confirms that EVT for leakages even from large defects of the upper GI tract is feasible in most cases but comes with significant technical challenges. KW - anastomotic leakage KW - endoluminal KW - vacuum-assisted closure KW - negative pressure KW - endoscopic Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-274044 SN - 2296-875X VL - 9 ER - TY - THES A1 - Döring, Anna Maria T1 - Einfluss der minimalen Distanz zwischen Tumor und Resektatrand auf die Prognose kurativ resezierter Patienten mit hepatocellulärem Carcinom T1 - How the resection margin influences the survival after curative liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma N2 - Dies ist eine retrospektive unizentrische Analyse um den Einfluss des Resektionsabstandes auf prognostische Faktoren wie das rezidivfreie und Gesamtüberleben bei Patienten mit hepatocellulären Carcinom zu untersuchen. Es ließ sich kein Vorteil eines weiten (>5mm) tumorfreien Abstands zum Resektatrand gegenüber einem schmalen (5mm) tumorfreien Abstand nachweisen. Allerdings wurden andere tumor- und patientenspezifische unabhängige Risikofaktoren für das rezidivfreie und Gesamtüberleben identifiziert. So ist ein präoperativer AFP-Wert >15µg/l mit einem signifikant schlechteren krankheitsfreien und Gesamtüberleben assoziiert. Ebenso haben schlecht differenzierte (G3) HCCs, sowie HCC mit einer vaskulären Invasion (V1/V2) ein deutlich reduziertes rezidivfreies Überleben. Auch eine Tumorgröße >5cm war in dieser Studie ein unabhängiger Risikofaktor für ein verkürztes Gesamtüberleben. N2 - This is a retrospective single center study regarding the influence of the resection margin after liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Therefore, we identified all patients undergoing liver resection between 2004-2018 at the university hostpital Würzburg for curative intention with hepatocellular carcinoma. Regarding the resection margin the study group was dichtomised in two groups, the LRwide group (resection margin >5mm) and the LRnarrow group (resection margin 5mm). We could not find a difference in disease free or overall survival between the groups. Nevertheless, we could identify the preoperative AFP levels >15µg/l to be an independent risk factor for worse disease free and overall survival. Also, large tumors (>5cm) are associates with reduced overall survival. KW - Leberzellkrebs KW - Leberresektion KW - Resektionsabstand KW - margin KW - Alpha Fetoprotein Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-276687 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Anger, Friedrich A1 - Döring, Anna A1 - van Dam, Jacob A1 - Lock, Johann Frisco A1 - Klein, Ingo A1 - Bittrich, Max A1 - Germer, Christoph-Thomas A1 - Wiegering, Armin A1 - Kunzmann, Volker A1 - van Eijck, Casper A1 - Löb, Stefan T1 - Impact of Borderline Resectability in Pancreatic Head Cancer on Patient Survival: Biology Matters According to the New International Consensus Criteria JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology N2 - Background International consensus criteria (ICC) have redefined borderline resectability for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) according to three dimensions: anatomical (BR-A), biological (BR-B), and conditional (BR-C). The present definition acknowledges that resectability is not just about the anatomic relationship between the tumour and vessels but that biological and conditional dimensions also are important. Methods Patients’ tumours were retrospectively defined borderline resectable according to ICC. The study cohort was grouped into either BR-A or BR-B and compared with patients considered primarily resectable (R). Differences in postoperative complications, pathological reports, overall (OS), and disease-free survival were assessed. Results A total of 345 patients underwent resection for PDAC. By applying ICC in routine preoperative assessment, 30 patients were classified as stage BR-A and 62 patients as stage BR-B. In total, 253 patients were considered R. The cohort did not contain BR-C patients. No differences in postoperative complications were detected. Median OS was significantly shorter in BR-A (15 months) and BR-B (12 months) compared with R (20 months) patients (BR-A vs. R: p = 0.09 and BR-B vs. R: p < 0.001). CA19-9, as the determining factor of BR-B patients, turned out to be an independent prognostic risk factor for OS. Conclusions Preoperative staging defining surgical resectability in PDAC according to ICC is crucial for patient survival. Patients with PDAC BR-B should be considered for multimodal neoadjuvant therapy even if considered anatomically resectable. KW - pancreatic head cancer Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-235251 SN - 1068-9265 VL - 28 IS - 4 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Reimer, Stanislaus A1 - Seyfried, Florian A1 - Flemming, Sven A1 - Brand, Markus A1 - Weich, Alexander A1 - Widder, Anna A1 - Plaßmeier, Lars A1 - Kraus, Peter A1 - Döring, Anna A1 - Hering, Ilona A1 - Hankir, Mohammed K. A1 - Meining, Alexander A1 - Germer, Christoph-Thomas A1 - Lock, Johan F. A1 - Groneberg, Kaja T1 - Evolution of endoscopic vacuum therapy for upper gastrointestinal leakage over a 10-year period: a quality improvement study JF - Surgical Endoscopy N2 - Background Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) is an effective treatment option for leakage of the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of quality improvements in EVT management on patients’ outcome. Methods All patients treated by EVT at our center during 2012–2021 were divided into two consecutive and equal-sized cohorts (period 1 vs. period 2). Over time several quality improvement strategies were implemented including the earlier diagnosis and EVT treatment and technical optimization of endoscopy. The primary endpoint was defined as the composite score MTL30 (mortality, transfer, length-of-stay > 30 days). Secondary endpoints included EVT efficacy, complications, in-hospital mortality, length-of-stay (LOS) and nutrition status at discharge. Results A total of 156 patients were analyzed. During the latter period the primary endpoint MTL30 decreased from 60.8 to 39.0% (P = .006). EVT efficacy increased from 80 to 91% (P = .049). Further, the need for additional procedures for leakage management decreased from 49.9 to 29.9% (P = .013) and reoperations became less frequent (38.0% vs.15.6%; P = .001). The duration of leakage therapy and LOS were shortened from 25 to 14 days (P = .003) and 38 days to 25 days (P = .006), respectively. Morbidity (as determined by the comprehensive complication index) decreased from 54.6 to 46.5 (P = .034). More patients could be discharged on oral nutrition (70.9% vs. 84.4%, P = .043). Conclusions Our experience confirms the efficacy of EVT for the successful management of UGI leakage. Our quality improvement analysis demonstrates significant changes in EVT management resulting in accelerated recovery, fewer complications and improved functional outcome. KW - anastomotic leak KW - gastrointestinal perforation KW - esophageal perforation KW - endoluminal KW - vacuum-assisted closure KW - negative pressure Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323953 VL - 36 IS - 12 ER -