TY - JOUR A1 - Seefried, Lothar A1 - Mueller-Deubert, Sigrid A1 - Schwarz, Thomas A1 - Lind, Thomas A1 - Mentrup, Birgit A1 - Kober, Melanie A1 - Docheva, Denitsa A1 - Liedert, Astrid A1 - Kassem, Moustapha A1 - Ignatius, Anita A1 - Schieker, Matthias A1 - Claes, Lutz A1 - Wilke, Winfried A1 - Jakob, Franz A1 - Ebert, Regina T1 - A small scale cell culture system to analyze mechanobiology using reporter gene constructs and polyurethane dishes N2 - Mechanical forces are translated into biochemical signals and contribute to cell differentiation and phenotype maintenance. Mesenchymal stem cells and their tissuespecific offspring, as osteoblasts and chondrocytes, cells of cardiovascular tissues and lung cells are sensitive to mechanical loading but molecules and mechanisms involved have to be unraveled. It is well established that cellular mechanotransduction is mediated e.g. by activation of the transcription factor SP1 and by kinase signaling cascades resulting in the activation of the AP1 complex. To investigate cellular mechanisms involved in mechanotransduction and to analyze substances, which modulate cellular mechanosensitivity reporter gene constructs, which can be transfected into cells of interest might be helpful. Suitable small-scale bioreactor systems and mechanosensitive reporter gene constructs are lacking. To analyze the molecular mechanisms of mechanotransduction and its crosstalk with biochemically induced signal transduction, AP1 and SP1 luciferase reporter gene constructs were cloned and transfected into various cell lines and primary cells. A newly developed bioreactor and small-scale 24-well polyurethane dishes were used to apply cyclic stretching to the transfected cells. 1 Hz cyclic stretching for 30 min in this system resulted in a significant stimulation of AP1 and SP1 mediated luciferase activity compared to unstimulated cells. In summary we describe a small-scale cell culture/bioreactor system capable of analyzing subcellular crosstalk mechanisms in mechanotransduction, mechanosensitivity of primary cells and of screening the activity of putative mechanosensitizers as new targets, e.g. for the treatment of bone loss caused by both disuse and signal transduction related alterations of mechanotransduction. KW - Bioreaktor KW - Mechanical strain KW - mechanosensitive reporter KW - gene constructs KW - bioreactor Y1 - 2010 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-68099 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Jakob, Franz A1 - Ebert, Regina A1 - Rudert, Maximilian A1 - Nöth, Ulrich A1 - Walles, Heike A1 - Docheva, Denitsa A1 - Schieker, Matthias A1 - Meinel, Lorenz A1 - Groll, Jürgen T1 - In situ guided tissue regeneration in musculoskeletal diseases and aging JF - Cell and Tissue Research N2 - In situ guided tissue regeneration, also addressed as in situ tissue engineering or endogenous regeneration, has a great potential for population-wide “minimal invasive” applications. During the last two decades, tissue engineering has been developed with remarkable in vitro and preclinical success but still the number of applications in clinical routine is extremely small. Moreover, the vision of population-wide applications of ex vivo tissue engineered constructs based on cells, growth and differentiation factors and scaffolds, must probably be deemed unrealistic for economic and regulation-related issues. Hence, the progress made in this respect will be mostly applicable to a fraction of post-traumatic or post-surgery situations such as big tissue defects due to tumor manifestation. Minimally invasive procedures would probably qualify for a broader application and ideally would only require off the shelf standardized products without cells. Such products should mimic the microenvironment of regenerating tissues and make use of the endogenous tissue regeneration capacities. Functionally, the chemotaxis of regenerative cells, their amplification as a transient amplifying pool and their concerted differentiation and remodeling should be addressed. This is especially important because the main target populations for such applications are the elderly and diseased. The quality of regenerative cells is impaired in such organisms and high levels of inhibitors also interfere with regeneration and healing. In metabolic bone diseases like osteoporosis, it is already known that antagonists for inhibitors such as activin and sclerostin enhance bone formation. Implementing such strategies into applications for in situ guided tissue regeneration should greatly enhance the efficacy of tailored procedures in the future. KW - in situ guided tissue regeneration KW - stem cells KW - scaffolds KW - regenerative medicine KW - mesenchymal tissues Y1 - 2012 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-124738 VL - 347 IS - 3 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kroner-Weigl, Niklas A1 - Chu, Jin A1 - Rudert, Maximilian A1 - Alt, Volker A1 - Shukunami, Chisa A1 - Docheva, Denitsa T1 - Dexamethasone is not sufficient to facilitate tenogenic differentiation of dermal fibroblasts in a 3D organoid model JF - Biomedicines N2 - Self-assembling three-dimensional organoids that do not rely on an exogenous scaffold but maintain their native cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix interactions represent a promising model in the field of tendon tissue engineering. We have identified dermal fibroblasts (DFs) as a potential cell type for generating functional tendon-like tissue. The glucocorticoid dexamethasone (DEX) has been shown to regulate cell proliferation and facilitate differentiation towards other mesenchymal lineages. Therefore, we hypothesized that the administration of DEX could reduce excessive DF proliferation and thus, facilitate the tenogenic differentiation of DFs using a previously established 3D organoid model combined with dose-dependent application of DEX. Interestingly, the results demonstrated that DEX, in all tested concentrations, was not sufficient to notably induce the tenogenic differentiation of human DFs and DEX-treated organoids did not have clear advantages over untreated control organoids. Moreover, high concentrations of DEX exerted a negative impact on the organoid phenotype. Nevertheless, the expression profile of tendon-related genes of untreated and 10 nM DEX-treated DF organoids was largely comparable to organoids formed by tendon-derived cells, which is encouraging for further investigations on utilizing DFs for tendon tissue engineering. KW - 3D organoids KW - dermal fibroblasts KW - dexamethasone KW - scaffold-free KW - tenogenic differentiation KW - tendon tissue engineering Y1 - 2023 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-311234 SN - 2227-9059 VL - 11 IS - 3 ER -