TY - JOUR A1 - Koch, Elias A. T. A1 - Petzold, Anne A1 - Wessely, Anja A1 - Dippel, Edgar A1 - Gesierich, Anja A1 - Gutzmer, Ralf A1 - Hassel, Jessica C. A1 - Haferkamp, Sebastian A1 - Hohberger, Bettina A1 - Kähler, Katharina C. A1 - Knorr, Harald A1 - Kreuzberg, Nicole A1 - Leiter, Ulrike A1 - Loquai, Carmen A1 - Meier, Friedegund A1 - Meissner, Markus A1 - Mohr, Peter A1 - Pföhler, Claudia A1 - Rahimi, Farnaz A1 - Schadendorf, Dirk A1 - Schell, Beatrice A1 - Schlaak, Max A1 - Terheyden, Patrick A1 - Thoms, Kai-Martin A1 - Schuler-Thurner, Beatrice A1 - Ugurel, Selma A1 - Ulrich, Jens A1 - Utikal, Jochen A1 - Weichenthal, Michael A1 - Ziller, Fabian A1 - Berking, Carola A1 - Heppt, Markus T1 - Immune checkpoint blockade for metastatic uveal melanoma: patterns of response and survival according to the presence of hepatic and extrahepatic metastasis JF - Cancers N2 - Background: Since there is no standardized and effective treatment for advanced uveal melanoma (UM), the prognosis is dismal once metastases develop. Due to the availability of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in the real-world setting, the prognosis of metastatic UM has improved. However, it is unclear how the presence of hepatic and extrahepatic metastasis impacts the response and survival after ICB. Methods: A total of 178 patients with metastatic UM treated with ICB were included in this analysis. Patients were recruited from German skin cancer centers and the German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg). To investigate the impact of hepatic metastasis, two cohorts were compared: patients with liver metastasis only (cohort A, n = 55) versus those with both liver and extra-hepatic metastasis (cohort B, n = 123). Data were analyzed in both cohorts for response to treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The survival and progression probabilities were calculated with the Kaplan–Meier method. Log-rank tests, χ\(^2\) tests, and t-tests were performed to detect significant differences between both cohorts. Results: The median OS of the overall population was 16 months (95% CI 13.4–23.7) and the median PFS, 2.8 months (95% CI 2.5–3.0). The median OS was longer in cohort B than in cohort A (18.2 vs. 6.1 months; p = 0.071). The best objective response rate to dual ICB was 13.8% and to anti-PD-1 monotherapy 8.9% in the entire population. Patients with liver metastases only had a lower response to dual ICB, yet without significance (cohort A 8.7% vs. cohort B 16.7%; p = 0.45). Adverse events (AE) occurred in 41.6%. Severe AE were observed in 26.3% and evenly distributed between both cohorts. Conclusion: The survival of this large cohort of patients with advanced UM was more favorable than reported in previous benchmark studies. Patients with both hepatic and extrahepatic metastasis showed more favorable survival and higher response to dual ICB than those with hepatic metastasis only. KW - uveal melanoma KW - immune checkpoint blockade KW - PD-1 KW - CTLA-4 KW - liver metastasis KW - treatment resistance Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-242603 SN - 2072-6694 VL - 13 IS - 13 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Buder, Kristina A1 - Gesierich, Anja A1 - Gelbrich, Götz A1 - Goebeler, Matthias T1 - Systemic treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma: review of literature and future perspectives JF - Cancer Medicine N2 - Up to 50% of patients with uveal melanoma develop metastatic disease with poor prognosis. Regional, mainly liver-directed, therapies may induce limited tumor responses but do not improve overall survival. Response rates of metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) to systemic chemotherapy are poor. Insights into the molecular biology of MUM recently led to investigation of new drugs. In this study, to compare response rates of systemic treatment for MUM we searched Pubmed/Web of Knowledge databases and ASCO website (1980–2013) for “metastatic/uveal/melanoma” and “melanoma/eye.” Forty studies (one case series, three phase I, five pilot, 22 nonrandomized, and two randomized phase II, one randomized phase III study, data of three expanded access programs, three retrospective studies) with 841 evaluable patients were included in the numeric outcome analysis. Complete or partial remissions were observed in 39/841 patients (overall response rate [ORR] 4.6%; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 3.3–6.3%), no responses were observed in 22/40 studies. Progression-free survival ranged from 1.8 to 7.2, median overall survival from 5.2 to 19.0 months as reported in 21/40 and 26/40 studies, respectively. Best responses were seen for chemoimmunotherapy (ORR 10.3%; 95% CI 4.8–18.7%) though mainly in first-line patients. Immunotherapy with ipilimumab, antiangiogenetic approaches, and kinase inhibitors have not yet proven to be superior to chemotherapy. MEK inhibitors are currently investigated in a phase II trial with promising preliminary data. Despite new insights into genetic and molecular background of MUM, satisfying systemic treatment approaches are currently lacking. Study results of innovative treatment strategies are urgently awaited. KW - Clinical trials KW - drug therapy KW - metastatic KW - review KW - uveal melanoma Y1 - 2013 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-97175 VL - 2 IS - 5 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Koch, Elias A. T. A1 - Petzold, Anne A1 - Wessely, Anja A1 - Dippel, Edgar A1 - Gesierich, Anja A1 - Gutzmer, Ralf A1 - Hassel, Jessica C. A1 - Haferkamp, Sebastian A1 - Kähler, Katharina C. A1 - Knorr, Harald A1 - Kreuzberg, Nicole A1 - Leiter, Ulrike A1 - Loquai, Carmen A1 - Meier, Friedegund A1 - Meissner, Markus A1 - Mohr, Peter A1 - Pföhler, Claudia A1 - Rahimi, Farnaz A1 - Schadendorf, Dirk A1 - Schell, Beatrice A1 - Schlaak, Max A1 - Terheyden, Patrick A1 - Thoms, Kai-Martin A1 - Schuler-Thurner, Beatrice A1 - Ugurel, Selma A1 - Ulrich, Jens A1 - Utikal, Jochen A1 - Weichenthal, Michael A1 - Ziller, Fabian A1 - Berking, Carola A1 - Heppt, Markus V. T1 - Immune checkpoint blockade for metastatic uveal melanoma: re-induction following resistance or toxicity JF - Cancers N2 - Re-induction with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) needs to be considered in many patients with uveal melanoma (UM) due to limited systemic treatment options. Here, we provide hitherto the first analysis of ICB re-induction in UM. A total of 177 patients with metastatic UM treated with ICB were included from German skin cancer centers and the German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg). To investigate the impact of ICB re-induction, two cohorts were compared: patients who received at least one ICB re-induction (cohort A, n = 52) versus those who received only one treatment line of ICB (cohort B, n = 125). In cohort A, a transient benefit of overall survival (OS) was observed at 6 and 12 months after the treatment start of ICB. There was no significant difference in OS between both groups (p = 0.1) with a median OS of 16.2 months (cohort A, 95% CI: 11.1–23.8) versus 9.4 months (cohort B, 95% CI: 6.1–14.9). Patients receiving re-induction of ICB (cohort A) had similar response rates compared to those receiving ICB once. Re-induction of ICB may yield a clinical benefit for a small subgroup of patients even after resistance or development of toxicities. KW - uveal melanoma KW - immune checkpoint blockade KW - PD-1 KW - CTLA-4 KW - re-induction KW - treatment resistance KW - toxicity Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-254814 SN - 2072-6694 VL - 14 IS - 3 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Glutsch, Valerie A1 - Kneitz, Hermann A1 - Gesierich, Anja A1 - Goebeler, Matthias A1 - Haferkamp, Sebastian A1 - Becker, Jürgen C. A1 - Ugurel, Selma A1 - Schilling, Bastian T1 - Activity of ipilimumab plus nivolumab in avelumab-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma JF - Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy N2 - Background Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine cutaneous malignancy with poor prognosis. In Europe, approved systemic therapies are limited to the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab. For avelumab-refractory patients, efficient and safe treatment options are lacking. Methods At three different sites in Germany, clinical and molecular data of patients with metastatic MCC being refractory to the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab and who were later on treated with combined IPI/NIVO were retrospectively collected and evaluated. Results Five patients treated at three different academic sites in Germany were enrolled. Three out of five patients investigated for this report responded to combined IPI/NIVO according to RECIST 1.1. Combined immunotherapy was well tolerated without any grade II or III immune-related adverse events. Two out of three responders to IPI/NIVO received platinum-based chemotherapy in between avelumab and combined immunotherapy. Conclusion In this small retrospective study, we observed a high response rate and durable responses to subsequent combined immunotherapy with IPI/NIVO in avelumab-refractory metastatic MCC patients. In conclusion, our data suggest a promising activity of second- or third-line PD-1- plus CTLA-4-blockade in patients with anti-PD-L1-refractory MCC. KW - ipilimumab KW - Merkel cell carcinoma KW - resistance KW - avelumab KW - nivolumab Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-265635 SN - 14320851 VL - 70 IS - 7 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Glutsch, Valerie A1 - Schummer, Patrick A1 - Kneitz, Hermann A1 - Gesierich, Anja A1 - Goebeler, Matthias A1 - Klein, Detlef A1 - Posch, Christian A1 - Gebhardt, Christoffer A1 - Haferkamp, Sebastian A1 - Zimmer, Lisa A1 - Becker, Jürgen C A1 - Leiter, Ulrike A1 - Weichenthal, Michael A1 - Schadendorf, Dirk A1 - Ugurel, Selma A1 - Schilling, Bastian T1 - Ipilimumab plus nivolumab in avelumab-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma: a multicenter study of the prospective skin cancer registry ADOREG JF - Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer N2 - Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare, highly aggressive skin cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation. Immune checkpoint inhibition has significantly improved treatment outcomes in metastatic disease with response rates to programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibition of up to 62%. However, primary and secondary resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition remains a so far unsolved clinical challenge since effective and safe treatment options for these patients are lacking.Fourteen patients with advanced (non-resectable stage III or stage IV, Union international contre le cancer 2017) Merkel cell carcinoma with primary resistance to the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab receiving subsequent therapy (second or later line) with ipilimumab plus nivolumab (IPI/NIVO) were identified in the prospective multicenter skin cancer registry ADOREG. Five of these 14 patients were reported previously and were included in this analysis with additional follow-up. Overall response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were analyzed.All 14 patients received avelumab as first-line treatment. Thereof, 12 patients had shown primary resistance with progressive disease in the first tumor assessment, while two patients had initially experienced a short-lived stabilization (stable disease). Six patients had at least one systemic treatment in between avelumab and IPI/NIVO. In total, 7 patients responded to IPI/NIVO (overall response rate 50%), and response was ongoing in 4 responders at last follow-up. After a median follow-up of 18.85 months, median PFS was 5.07 months (95% CI 2.43—not available (NA)), and median OS was not reached. PFS rates at 12 months and 24 months were 42.9% and 26.8 %, respectively. The OS rate at 36 months was 64.3%. Only 3 (21%) patients did not receive all 4 cycles of IPI/NIVO due to immune-related adverse events.In this multicenter evaluation, we observed high response rates, a durable benefit and promising OS rates after treatment with later-line combined IPI/NIVO. In conclusion, our patient cohort supports our prior findings with an encouraging activity of second-line or later-line IPI/NIVO in patients with anti-PD-L1-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma. KW - Skin Neoplasms KW - CTLA-4 Antigen KW - Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor KW - B7-H1 Antigen KW - Drug Therapy, Combination Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-304613 SN - 2051-1426 VL - 10 IS - 11 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schummer, Patrick A1 - Schilling, Bastian A1 - Gesierich, Anja T1 - Long‑Term Outcomes in BRAF‑Mutated Melanoma Treated with Combined Targeted Therapy or Immune Checkpoint Blockade: Are We Approaching a True Cure? JF - American Journal of Clinical Dermatology N2 - Approximately 50% of all melanomas harbor an activating BRAF mutation. In patients suffering from an advanced melanoma with such a somatic alteration, combined targeted therapy with a BRAF and MEK inhibitor can be applied to significantly increase the survival probability. Nevertheless, resistance mechanisms, as well as negative predictive biomarkers (elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, high number of metastatic organ disease sites, brain metastasis), remain a major problem in treating melanoma patients. Recently, a landmark overall survival (OS) rate of 34% after 5 years of combined targeted therapy in treatment-naïve patients was reported. On the other hand, patients harboring a BRAF mutation and receiving first-line immune checkpoint blockade with ipilimumab plus nivolumab showed a 5-year OS rate of 60%. As indicated by these data, long-term survival can be reached in melanoma patients but it remains unclear if this is equivalent to reaching a true cure for metastatic melanoma. In this review, we summarize the recent results for combined targeted therapy and immunotherapy in advanced melanoma harboring an activating BRAF mutation and discuss the impact of baseline characteristics on long-term outcome. KW - BARF-mutated melanoma KW - combined targeted therapy KW - immune checkpoint blockade Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-234818 SN - 1175-0561 VL - 21 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Baur, Johannes A1 - Mathe, Katrin A1 - Gesierich, Anja A1 - Weyandt, Gerhard A1 - Wiegering, Armin A1 - Germer, Christoph-Thomas A1 - Gasser, Martin A1 - Pelz, Jörg O. W. T1 - Morbidity and oncologic outcome after saphenous vein-sparing inguinal lymphadenectomy in melanoma patients JF - World Journal of Surgical Oncology N2 - Background: Inguinal lymph node dissection (LND) is a surgical procedure with a high morbidity rate. Variations in surgical procedure, such as sparing of the saphenous vein, have been proposed to reduce surgical morbidity. While sparing of the saphenous vein has shown promising results in earlier studies, data for this procedure in melanoma patients are rare. In this retrospective study, we report 10-year findings on the effects of saphenous vein-sparing LND on surgical morbidity and oncologic outcomes in melanoma patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of melanoma patients receiving inguinal LND in our facility between 2003 and 2013 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: the saphenous vein resection group and the vein sparing group. Surgical morbidity, including wound infection, lymphatic fistula, severe bleeding, neurological complications, and chronic lymphedema, as well as regional recurrence-free survival were investigated. Results: A total of 106 patients were included in this study; of these, the saphenous vein was spared in 41 patients (38.7%). The rate of lymphatic fistula was 51.6 vs. 48.8%, wound infection occurred in 31.3 vs. 24.4%, and patients suffered from chronic lymphedema in 30.0 vs. 26.5% in V. saphena magna resection vs. sparing group. Differences observed, however, were not significant. No difference in regional recurrence-free survival between the two study groups was detected. Conclusions: The results of our retrospective analysis could not confirm the promising results reported in earlier studies. Thus, sparing of the saphenous vein appears to be optional. KW - malignant melanoma KW - inguinal lymph node dissection KW - regional recurrence KW - V. saphena magna Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-157687 VL - 15 IS - 99 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wendlinger, Simone A1 - Wohlfarth, Jonas A1 - Kreft, Sophia A1 - Siedel, Claudia A1 - Kilian, Teresa A1 - Dischinger, Ulrich A1 - Heppt, Markus V. A1 - Wistuba-Hamprecht, Kilian A1 - Meier, Friedegund A1 - Goebeler, Matthias A1 - Schadendorf, Dirk A1 - Gesierich, Anja A1 - Kosnopfel, Corinna A1 - Schilling, Bastian T1 - Blood eosinophils are associated with efficacy of targeted therapy in patients with advanced melanoma JF - Cancers N2 - Background: Eosinophils appear to contribute to the efficacy of immunotherapy and their frequency was suggested as a predictive biomarker. Whether this observation could be transferred to patients treated with targeted therapy remains unknown. Methods: Blood and serum samples of healthy controls and 216 patients with advanced melanoma were prospectively and retrospectively collected. Freshly isolated eosinophils were phenotypically characterized by flow cytometry and co-cultured in vitro with melanoma cells to assess cytotoxicity. Soluble serum markers and peripheral blood counts were used for correlative studies. Results: Eosinophil-mediated cytotoxicity towards melanoma cells, as well as phenotypic characteristics, were similar when comparing healthy donors and patients. However, high relative pre-treatment eosinophil counts were significantly associated with response to MAPKi (p = 0.013). Eosinophil-mediated cytotoxicity towards melanoma cells is dose-dependent and requires proximity of eosinophils and their target in vitro. Treatment with targeted therapy in the presence of eosinophils results in an additive tumoricidal effect. Additionally, melanoma cells affected eosinophil phenotype upon co-culture. Conclusion: High pre-treatment eosinophil counts in advanced melanoma patients were associated with a significantly improved response to MAPKi. Functionally, eosinophils show potent cytotoxicity towards melanoma cells, which can be reinforced by MAPKi. Further studies are needed to unravel the molecular mechanisms of our observations. KW - melanoma KW - eosinophils KW - biomarker Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-275137 SN - 2072-6694 VL - 14 IS - 9 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Glutsch, Valerie A1 - Wobser, Marion A1 - Schilling, Bastian A1 - Gesierich, Anja A1 - Goebeler, Matthias A1 - Kneitz, Hermann T1 - PRAME expression as helpful immunohistochemical marker in rhabdoid melanoma JF - Dermatopathology N2 - Background: Rhabdoid melanoma is a rare variant of malignant melanoma with characteristic cytomorphologic features. Due to the potential loss of conventional melanocytic markers, histopathologic diagnosis is often challenging. We hypothesize that immunostaining for PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) might have the potential to uncover the melanocytic origin of these dedifferentiated tumors. Methods: Four cases of rhabdoid primary melanomas were assessed by immunohistochemistry for expression of PRAME and conventional melanocytic markers. Immunohistochemical expression patterns were analyzed in the rhabdoid primaries and, if available, associated metastases. Results: All four cases of rhabdoid primary melanomas showed a strong nuclear positivity for PRAME, while the expression of conventional melanocytic markers S100, MART-1, SOX-10 and HMB-45 was variable between the analyzed cases. Conclusions: In summary, we report four cases of rhabdoid primary melanoma with high to intermediate expression of PRAME despite the partial and variable loss of other melanocytic markers. Hence, PRAME might facilitate the recognition of this highly aggressive entity to avoid misdiagnosis due to histopathologic pitfalls. KW - PRAME KW - rhabdoid differentiation KW - rhabdoid melanoma KW - immunohistochemistry KW - melanocytic markers Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-284115 SN - 2296-3529 VL - 9 IS - 2 SP - 148 EP - 157 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Isberner, Nora A1 - Gesierich, Anja A1 - Balakirouchenane, David A1 - Schilling, Bastian A1 - Aghai-Trommeschlaeger, Fatemeh A1 - Zimmermann, Sebastian A1 - Kurlbaum, Max A1 - Puszkiel, Alicja A1 - Blanchet, Benoit A1 - Klinker, Hartwig A1 - Scherf-Clavel, Oliver T1 - Monitoring of dabrafenib and trametinib in serum and self-sampled capillary blood in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma JF - Cancers N2 - Simple Summary In melanoma patients treated with dabrafenib and trametinib, dose reductions and treatment discontinuations related to adverse events (AE) occur frequently. However, the associations between patient characteristics, AE, and exposure are unclear. Our prospective study analyzed serum (hydroxy-)dabrafenib and trametinib exposure and investigated its association with toxicity and patient characteristics. Additionally, the feasibility of at-home sampling of capillary blood was assessed, and a model to convert capillary blood concentrations to serum concentrations was developed. (Hydroxy-)dabrafenib or trametinib exposure was not associated with age, sex, body mass index, or AE. Co-medication with P-glycoprotein inducers was associated with lower trough concentrations of trametinib but not (hydroxy-)dabrafenib. The applicability of the self-sampling of capillary blood was demonstrated. Our conversion model was adequate for estimating serum exposure from micro-samples. The monitoring of dabrafenib and trametinib may be useful for dose modification and can be optimized by at-home sampling and our new conversion model. Abstract Patients treated with dabrafenib and trametinib for BRAF\(^{V600}\)-mutant melanoma often experience dose reductions and treatment discontinuations. Current knowledge about the associations between patient characteristics, adverse events (AE), and exposure is inconclusive. Our study included 27 patients (including 18 patients for micro-sampling). Dabrafenib and trametinib exposure was prospectively analyzed, and the relevant patient characteristics and AE were reported. Their association with the observed concentrations and Bayesian estimates of the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of (hydroxy-)dabrafenib and trametinib were investigated. Further, the feasibility of at-home sampling of capillary blood was assessed. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model-informed conversion model was developed to derive serum PK parameters from self-sampled capillary blood. Results showed that (hydroxy-)dabrafenib or trametinib exposure was not associated with age, sex, body mass index, or toxicity. Co-medication with P-glycoprotein inducers was associated with significantly lower trough concentrations of trametinib (p = 0.027) but not (hydroxy-)dabrafenib. Self-sampling of capillary blood was feasible for use in routine care. Our conversion model was adequate for estimating serum PK parameters from micro-samples. Findings do not support a general recommendation for monitoring dabrafenib and trametinib but suggest that monitoring can facilitate making decisions about dosage adjustments. To this end, micro-sampling and the newly developed conversion model may be useful for estimating precise PK parameters. KW - dabrafenib KW - trametinib KW - hydroxy-dabrafenib KW - melanoma KW - BRAF mutation KW - volumetric absorptive micro-sampling (VAMS) KW - at-home sampling KW - drug monitoring KW - population pharmacokinetics Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-288109 SN - 2072-6694 VL - 14 IS - 19 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Glutsch, Valerie A1 - Grän, Franziska A1 - Weber, Judith A1 - Gesierich, Anja A1 - Goebeler, Matthias A1 - Schilling, Bastian T1 - Response to combined ipilimumab and nivolumab after development of a nephrotic syndrome related to PD-1 monotherapy JF - Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer N2 - Background High response rates of metastatic melanoma have been reported upon immune checkpoint inhibition by PD-1 blockade alone or in combination with CTLA-4 inhibitors. However, the majority of patients with a primary resistance to anti-PD-1 monotherapy is also refractory to a subsequent combined checkpoint inhibition. In BRAF wildtype patients with a primary resistance to PD-1 inhibitors, therapeutic options are therefore limited and immune-related adverse events (irAE) have to be taken into consideration when discussing a subsequent immunotherapy. Case presentation We report the case of a 68-year-old male patient with metastatic melanoma who experienced an acute renal failure with nephrotic syndrome due to a minimal change disease developing after a single dose of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab. A kidney biopsy revealed a podocytopathy without signs of interstitial nephritis. Renal function recovered to almost normal creatinine and total urine protein levels upon treatment with oral steroids and diuretics. Unfortunately, a disease progression (PD, RECIST 1.1) was observed in a CT scan after resolution of the irAE. In a grand round, re-exposure to a PD-1-containing regime was recommended. Consensually, a combined immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab was initiated. Nephrotoxicity was tolerable during combined immunotherapy and a CT scan of chest and abdomen showed a deep partial remission (RECIST 1.1) after three doses of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) and nivolumab (1 mg/kg). Conclusion This case illustrates that a fulminant response to combined checkpoint inhibition is possible after progression after anti-PD-1 monotherapy and a severe irAE. KW - PD-1 KW - Immune-related adverse event KW - Minimal change disease KW - Ipilimumab KW - Nivolumab Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-201214 VL - 7 ER -