TY - JOUR A1 - Gerszten, Peter C. A1 - Sahgal, Arjun A1 - Sheehan, Jason P. A1 - Kersh, Ronald A1 - Chen, Stephanie A1 - Flickinger, John C. A1 - Quader, Mubina A1 - Fahim, Daniel A1 - Grills, Inga A1 - Shin, John H. A1 - Winey, Brian A1 - Oh, Kevin A1 - Sweeney, Reinhart A. A1 - Guckenberger, Matthias T1 - A multi-national report on methods for institutional credentialing for spine radiosurgery JF - Radiation Oncology N2 - Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiosurgery are rapidly emerging treatment options for both malignant and benign spine tumors. Proper institutional credentialing by physicians and medical physicists as well as other personnel is important for the safe and effective adoption of spine radiosurgery. This article describes the methods for institutional credentialing for spine radiosurgery at seven highly experienced international institutions. Methods: All institutions (n = 7) are members of the Elekta Spine Radiosurgery Research Consortium and have a dedicated research and clinical focus on image-guided spine radiosurgery. A questionnaire consisting of 24 items covering various aspects of institutional credentialing for spine radiosurgery was completed by all seven institutions. Results: Close agreement was observed in most aspects of spine radiosurgery credentialing at each institution. A formal credentialing process was believed to be important for the implementation of a new spine radiosurgery program, for patient safety and clinical outcomes. One institution has a written policy specific for spine radiosurgery credentialing, but all have an undocumented credentialing system in place. All institutions rely upon an in-house proctoring system for the training of both physicians and medical physicists. Four institutions require physicians and medical physicists to attend corporate sponsored training. Two of these 4 institutions also require attendance at a non-corporate sponsored academic society radiosurgery course. Corporate as well as non-corporate sponsored training were believed to be complimentary and both important for training. In 5 centers, all cases must be reviewed at a multidisciplinary conference prior to radiosurgery treatment. At 3 centers, neurosurgeons are not required to be involved in all cases if there is no evidence for instability or spinal cord compression. Backup physicians and physicists are required at only 1 institution, but all institutions have more than one specialist trained to perform spine radiosurgery. All centers believed that credentialing should also be device specific, and all believed that professional societies should formulate guidelines for institutions on the requirements for spine radiosurgery credentialing. Finally, in 4 institutions radiation therapists were required to attend corporate-sponsored device specific training for credentialing, and in only 1 institution were radiation therapists required to also attend academic society training for credentialing. Conclusions: This study represents the first multi-national report of the current practice of institutional credentialing for spine radiosurgery. Key methodologies for safe implementation and credentialing of spine radiosurgery have been identified. There is strong agreement among experienced centers that credentialing is an important component of the safe and effective implementation of a spine radiosurgery program. KW - cyberknife radiosurgery KW - advanced technology KW - conformal radiotherapy KW - clinical trials KW - quality assurance KW - credentialing KW - spine tumors KW - stereotactic body radiotherapy KW - spine Radiosurgery KW - paraspinal tumors KW - intensity modulated radiotherapy KW - ACR practice guidelines KW - radiation therapy Y1 - 2013 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-131485 VL - 8 IS - 158 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hardcastle, Nicholas A1 - Tomé, Wolfgang A. A1 - Cannon, Donald M. A1 - Brouwer, Charlotte L. A1 - Wittendorp, Paul W. H. A1 - Dogan, Nesrin A1 - Guckenberger, Matthias A1 - Allaire, Stéphane A1 - Mallya, Yogish A1 - Kumar, Prashant A1 - Oechsner, Markus A1 - Richter, Anne A1 - Song, Shiyu A1 - Myers, Michael A1 - Polat, Bülent A1 - Bzdusek, Karl T1 - A multi-institution evaluation of deformable image registration algorithms for automatic organ delineation in adaptive head and neck radiotherapy JF - Radiation Oncology N2 - Background: Adaptive Radiotherapy aims to identify anatomical deviations during a radiotherapy course and modify the treatment plan to maintain treatment objectives. This requires regions of interest (ROIs) to be defined using the most recent imaging data. This study investigates the clinical utility of using deformable image registration (DIR) to automatically propagate ROIs. Methods: Target (GTV) and organ-at-risk (OAR) ROIs were non-rigidly propagated from a planning CT scan to a per-treatment CT scan for 22 patients. Propagated ROIs were quantitatively compared with expert physician-drawn ROIs on the per-treatment scan using Dice scores and mean slicewise Hausdorff distances, and center of mass distances for GTVs. The propagated ROIs were qualitatively examined by experts and scored based on their clinical utility. Results: Good agreement between the DIR-propagated ROIs and expert-drawn ROIs was observed based on the metrics used. 94% of all ROIs generated using DIR were scored as being clinically useful, requiring minimal or no edits. However, 27% (12/44) of the GTVs required major edits. Conclusion: DIR was successfully used on 22 patients to propagate target and OAR structures for ART with good anatomical agreement for OARs. It is recommended that propagated target structures be thoroughly reviewed by the treating physician. KW - intensity-modulated radiotherapy KW - megavoltage computed-tomography KW - cancer KW - variability KW - strategies KW - risk Y1 - 2012 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-134756 VL - 7 IS - 90 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Colvill, Emma A1 - Booth, Jeremy A1 - Nill, Simeon A1 - Fast, Martin A1 - Bedford, James A1 - Oelfke, Uwe A1 - Nakamura, Mitsuhiro A1 - Poulsen, Per A1 - Worm, Esben A1 - Hansen, Rune A1 - Ravkilde, Thomas A1 - Rydhög, Jonas Scherman A1 - Pommer, Tobias A1 - af Rosenschold, Per Munck A1 - Lang, Stephanie A1 - Guckenberger, Matthias A1 - Groh, Christian A1 - Herrmann, Christian A1 - Verellen, Dirk A1 - Poels, Kenneth A1 - Wang, Lei A1 - Hadsell, Michael A1 - Sothmann, Thilo A1 - Blanck, Oliver A1 - Keall, Paul T1 - A dosimetric comparison of real-time adaptive and non-adaptive radiotherapy: a multi-institutional study encompassing robotic, gimbaled, multileaf collimator and couch tracking JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology N2 - Purpose: A study of real-time adaptive radiotherapy systems was performed to test the hypothesis that, across delivery systems and institutions, the dosimetric accuracy is improved with adaptive treatments over non-adaptive radiotherapy in the presence of patient-measured tumor motion. Methods and materials: Ten institutions with robotic(2), gimbaled(2), MLC(4) or couch tracking(2) used common materials including CT and structure sets, motion traces and planning protocols to create a lung and a prostate plan. For each motion trace, the plan was delivered twice to a moving dosimeter; with and without real-time adaptation. Each measurement was compared to a static measurement and the percentage of failed points for gamma-tests recorded. Results: For all lung traces all measurement sets show improved dose accuracy with a mean 2%/2 mm gamma-fail rate of 1.6% with adaptation and 15.2% without adaptation (p < 0.001). For all prostate the mean 2%/2 mm gamma-fail rate was 1.4% with adaptation and 17.3% without adaptation (p < 0.001). The difference between the four systems was small with an average 2%/2 mm gamma-fail rate of <3% for all systems with adaptation for lung and prostate. Conclusions: The investigated systems all accounted for realistic tumor motion accurately and performed to a similar high standard, with real-time adaptation significantly outperforming non-adaptive delivery methods. KW - Robotic tracking KW - Gimbaled tracking KW - MLC tracking KW - Couch tracking KW - Organ motion Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-189605 VL - 119 IS - 1 ER -