TY - JOUR A1 - Kasang, Christa A1 - Kalluvya, Samuel A1 - Majinge, Charles A1 - Kongola, Gilbert A1 - Mlewa, Mathias A1 - Massawe, Irene A1 - Kabyemera, Rogatus A1 - Magambo, Kinanga A1 - Ulmer, Albrecht A1 - Klinker, Hartwig A1 - Gschmack, Eva A1 - Horn, Anne A1 - Koutsilieri, Eleni A1 - Preiser, Wolfgang A1 - Hofmann, Daniela A1 - Hain, Johannes A1 - Müller, Andreas A1 - Dölken, Lars A1 - Weissbrich, Benedikt A1 - Rethwilm, Axel A1 - Stich, August A1 - Scheller, Carsten T1 - Effects of Prednisolone on Disease Progression in Antiretroviral-Untreated HIV Infection: A 2-Year Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial JF - PLoS One N2 - Background HIV-disease progression correlates with immune activation. Here we investigated whether corticosteroid treatment can attenuate HIV disease progression in antiretroviral-untreated patients. Methods Double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial including 326 HIV-patients in a resource-limited setting in Tanzania (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01299948). Inclusion criteria were a CD4 count above 300 cells/μl, the absence of AIDS-defining symptoms and an ART-naïve therapy status. Study participants received 5 mg prednisolone per day or placebo for 2 years. Primary endpoint was time to progression to an AIDS-defining condition or to a CD4-count below 200 cells/μl. Results No significant change in progression towards the primary endpoint was observed in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis (19 cases with prednisolone versus 28 cases with placebo, p = 0.1407). In a per-protocol (PP)-analysis, 13 versus 24 study participants progressed to the primary study endpoint (p = 0.0741). Secondary endpoints: Prednisolone-treatment decreased immune activation (sCD14, suPAR, CD38/HLA-DR/CD8+) and increased CD4-counts (+77.42 ± 5.70 cells/μl compared to -37.42 ± 10.77 cells/μl under placebo, p < 0.0001). Treatment with prednisolone was associated with a 3.2-fold increase in HIV viral load (p < 0.0001). In a post-hoc analysis stratifying for sex, females treated with prednisolone progressed significantly slower to the primary study endpoint than females treated with placebo (ITT-analysis: 11 versus 21 cases, p = 0.0567; PP-analysis: 5 versus 18 cases, p = 0.0051): No changes in disease progression were observed in men. Conclusions This study could not detect any significant effects of prednisolone on disease progression in antiretroviral-untreated HIV infection within the intent-to-treat population. However, significant effects were observed on CD4 counts, immune activation and HIV viral load. This study contributes to a better understanding of the role of immune activation in the pathogenesis of HIV infection. KW - HIV KW - immune activation KW - viral load KW - drug adherence KW - viral replication KW - AIDS KW - HIV infections KW - highly-active antiretroviral therapy Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-146479 VL - 11 IS - 1 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kasang, Christa A1 - Kalluvya, Samuel A1 - Majinge, Charles A1 - Stich, August A1 - Bodem, Jochen A1 - Kongola, Gilbert A1 - Jacobs, Graeme B. A1 - Mllewa, Mathias A1 - Mildner, Miriam A1 - Hensel, Irina A1 - Horn, Anne A1 - Preiser, Wolfgang A1 - van Zyl, Gert A1 - Klinker, Hartwig A1 - Koutsilieri, Eleni A1 - Rethwilm, Axel A1 - Scheller, Carsten A1 - Weissbrich, Benedikt T1 - HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) in antiretroviral therapy-naive patients in Tanzania not eligible for WHO threshold HIVDR survey is dramatically high N2 - Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended guidelines for a HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) survey for resource-limited countries. Eligibility criteria for patients include age below 25 years in order to focus on the prevalence of transmitted HIVDR (tHIVDR) in newly-infected individuals. Most of the participating sites across Africa have so far reported tHIVDR prevalences of below 5%. In this study we investigated whether the rate of HIVDR in patients ,25 years is representative for HIVDR in the rest of the therapy-naive population. Methods and Findings: HIVDR was determined in 88 sequentially enrolled ART-naive patients from Mwanza, Tanzania (mean age 35.4 years). Twenty patients were aged, 25 years and 68 patients were aged 25–63 years. The frequency of HIVDR in the study population was 14.8% (95%; CI 0.072–0.223) and independent of NVP-resistance induced by prevention of mother-to-child transmission programs. Patients .25 years had a significantly higher HIVDR frequency than younger patients (19.1%; 95% CI 0.095–0.28) versus 0%, P = 0.0344). In 2 out of the 16 patients with HIVDR we found traces of antiretrovirals (ARVs) in plasma. Conclusions: ART-naive patients aged over 25 years exhibited significantly higher HIVDR than younger patients. Detection of traces of ARVs in individuals with HIVDR suggests that besides transmission, undisclosed misuse of ARVs may constitute a significant factor in the generation of the observed high HIVDR rate. The current WHO tHIVDR survey that is solely focused on the transmission of HIVDR and that excludes patients over 25 years of age may therefore result in substantial underestimation of the prevalence of HIVDR in the therapy-naive population. Similar studies should be performed also in other areas to test whether the so far reported optimistic picture of low HIVDR prevalence in young individuals is really representative for the rest of the ART-naive HIV-infected population. KW - Tansania KW - HIV Y1 - 2011 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-69024 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kasang, Christa A1 - Kalluvya, Samuel A1 - Majinge, Charles A1 - Stich, August A1 - Bodem, Jochen A1 - Kongola, Gilbert A1 - Jacobs, Graeme B. A1 - Mlewa, Mathias A1 - Mildner, Miriam A1 - Hensel, Irina A1 - Horn, Anne A1 - Preiser, Wolfgang A1 - van Zyl, Gert A1 - Klinker, Hartwig A1 - Koutsilieri, Eleni A1 - Rethwilm, Axel A1 - Scheller, Carsten A1 - Weissbrich, Benedikt T1 - HIV Drug Resistance (HIVDR) in Antiretroviral Therapy-Naïve Patients in Tanzania Not Eligible for WHO Threshold HIVDR Survey Is Dramatically High JF - PLoS One N2 - Background The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended guidelines for a HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) survey for resource-limited countries. Eligibility criteria for patients include age below 25 years in order to focus on the prevalence of transmitted HIVDR (tHIVDR) in newly-infected individuals. Most of the participating sites across Africa have so far reported tHIVDR prevalences of below 5%. In this study we investigated whether the rate of HIVDR in patients <25 years is representative for HIVDR in the rest of the therapy-naïve population. Methods and Findings HIVDR was determined in 88 sequentially enrolled ART-naïve patients from Mwanza, Tanzania (mean age 35.4 years). Twenty patients were aged <25 years and 68 patients were aged 25–63 years. The frequency of HIVDR in the study population was 14.8% (95%; CI 0.072–0.223) and independent of NVP-resistance induced by prevention of mother-to-child transmission programs. Patients >25 years had a significantly higher HIVDR frequency than younger patients (19.1%; 95% CI 0.095–0.28) versus 0%, P = 0.0344). In 2 out of the 16 patients with HIVDR we found traces of antiretrovirals (ARVs) in plasma. Conclusions ART-naïve patients aged over 25 years exhibited significantly higher HIVDR than younger patients. Detection of traces of ARVs in individuals with HIVDR suggests that besides transmission, undisclosed misuse of ARVs may constitute a significant factor in the generation of the observed high HIVDR rate. The current WHO tHIVDR survey that is solely focused on the transmission of HIVDR and that excludes patients over 25 years of age may therefore result in substantial underestimation of the prevalence of HIVDR in the therapy-naïve population. Similar studies should be performed also in other areas to test whether the so far reported optimistic picture of low HIVDR prevalence in young individuals is really representative for the rest of the ART-naïve HIV-infected population. KW - Tanzania KW - antimicrobial resistance KW - antiretroviral therapy KW - HIV KW - sequence databases KW - mutation databases KW - antiretrovirals KW - HIV diagnosis and management Y1 - 2011 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-137988 VL - 6 IS - 8 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gunda, Daniel W. A1 - Kasang, Christa A1 - Kidenya, Benson R. A1 - Kabangila, Rodrick A1 - Mshana, Stephen E. A1 - Kidola, Jeremiah A1 - Kalluvya, Samuel E. A1 - Kongola, Gilbert W. A1 - Klinker, Hartwig T1 - Plasma Concentrations of Efavirenz and Nevirapine among HIV-Infected Patients with Immunological Failure Attending a Tertiary Hospital in North-Western Tanzania JF - PLOS ONE N2 - Background: Sub-therapeutic and supra-therapeutic plasma concentrations of antriretrovirals are the significant causes of treatment failure and toxicity respectively among HIV-infected patients. We conducted this study to determine the pattern of efavirenz and nevirapine plasma drug concentrations among adult HIV-infected patients with immunological failure attending at a tertiary hospital in North-western Tanzania. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among adult HIV-infected patients with immunological failure who have been on either efavirenz or nevirapine based antiretroviral regimen for more than 6 months. Patients were serially enrolled through routine Care and Treatment Clinic (CTC) activities. Plasma drug concentrations for efavirenz and nevirapine were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and Gas Chromatography (GC) respectively. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data such as viral load and CD4 counts were collected. Data analysis was done using STATA 12. Results: Of the 152 patients with immunological failure enrolled, the sub-therapeutic, therapeutic and supra-therapeutic plasma antiretroviral drug concentrations were found in 43/152 (28.3%), 76/152 (50.0%) and 33/152 (21.7%) respectively. Half of the patients were outside therapeutic window with either sub-therapeutic or supra-therapeutic plasma ARV drug concentrations. There was a significant difference in distribution of ARV adherence (p-value<0.001), NRTI backbone (p-value = 0.039), HIV stage (p-value = 0.026) and viral load (p-value = 0.007) within sub-therapeutic, therapeutic and supratherapeutic ARV plasma drug concentrations. Conclusion: There is a wide inter-individual variability of plasma ARV concentrations among HIV patients with immunological failure, with a large proportion of patients being outside therapeutic window. This variability is significant based on ARV adherence, NRTI backbone, viral load and HIV stage. Routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could assist identifying these patients early and making timely correction to avoid virological failure, poor immunological outcome and prevent associated drug toxicities. Nonetheless, ARV adherence should be strictly emphasized on HIV patients with immunological failure. KW - reverse-transcriptase inhibitors KW - randomized controlled-trial KW - routine clinical-practice KW - antiretroviral therapy KW - drug interactions KW - HIV-1-infected patients KW - management KW - indinavir KW - Uganda Y1 - 2013 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-128456 SN - 1932-6203 VL - 8 IS - 9 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kasang, Christa A1 - Ulmer, Albrecht A1 - Donhauser, Norbert A1 - Schmidt, Barabara A1 - Stich, August A1 - Klinker, Hartwig A1 - Kalluvya, Samuel A1 - Koutsilieri, Eleni A1 - Rethwilm, Axel A1 - Scheller, Carsten T1 - HIV patients treated with low-dose prednisolone exhibit lower immune activation than untreated patients N2 - Background: HIV-associated general immune activation is a strong predictor for HIV disease progression, suggesting that chronic immune activation may drive HIV pathogenesis. Consequently, immunomodulating agents may decelerate HIV disease progression. Methods: In an observational study, we determined immune activation in HIV patients receiving low-dose (5 mg/day) prednisolone with or without highly-active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) compared to patients without prednisolone treatment. Lymphocyte activation was determined by flow cytometry detecting expression of CD38 on CD8(+) T cells. The monocyte activation markers sCD14 and LPS binding protein (LBP) as well as inflammation markers soluble urokinase plasminogen activated receptor (suPAR) and sCD40L were determined from plasma by ELISA. Results: CD38-expression on CD8+ T lymphocytes was significantly lower in prednisolone-treated patients compared to untreated patients (median 55.40% [percentile range 48.76-67.70] versus 73.34% [65.21-78.92], p = 0.0011, Mann-Whitney test). Similarly, we detected lower levels of sCD14 (3.6 μg/ml [2.78-5.12] vs. 6.11 μg/ml [4.58-7.70]; p = 0.0048), LBP (2.18 ng/ml [1.59-2.87] vs. 3.45 ng/ml [1.84-5.03]; p = 0.0386), suPAR antigen (2.17 μg/ml [1.65-2.81] vs. 2.56 μg/ml [2.24-4.26]; p = 0.0351) and a trend towards lower levels of sCD40L (2.70 pg/ml [1.90-4.00] vs. 3.60 pg/ml [2.95-5.30]; p = 0.0782). Viral load in both groups was similar (0.8 × 105 ng/ml [0.2-42.4 × 105] vs. 1.1 × 105 [0.5-12.2 × 105]; p = 0.3806). No effects attributable to prednisolone were observed when patients receiving HAART in combination with prednisolone were compared to patients who received HAART alone. Conclusions: Patients treated with low-dose prednisolone display significantly lower general immune activation than untreated patients. Further longitudinal studies are required to assess whether treatment with low-dose prednisolone translates into differences in HIV disease progression. KW - HIV KW - Prednisolon Y1 - 2012 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-75100 ER - TY - THES A1 - Kasang, Christa T1 - Untersuchung der Effekte von Prednisolon auf die HIV-Progression und Ermittlung der Medikamentenresistenz in antiretroviral-unbehandelten HIV-Patienten in Tansania T1 - Progression of HIV disease under corticosteroid treatment and occurrence of antiretroviral drug resistances in therapy naive HIV infected patients in Tanzania N2 - Die Progression der HIV Infektion ist vermutlich bedingt von einer unspezifischen generalisierten Immunaktivierung des Patienten (Sousa, Carneiro et al. 2002; Hazenberg, Otto et al. 2003). Somit könnte ein immunsuppressives Medikament wie das Kortisonpräparat Prednisolon die Progression der Erkrankung verlangsamen. Im Rahmen nicht-kontrollierter Studien konnte die Stabilisierung der CD4+ T-Lymphozyten in HIV-Patienten durch den Einsatz von Kortison beobachtet werden (Andrieu, Lu et al. 1995; Lu, Salerno-Goncalves et al. 1995). Dieser Effekt konnte auch mit niedrig dosiertem Prednisolon (5 mg/Tag) nachgewiesen werden (Ulmer, Muller et al. 2005). Jedoch zeigen neuere Ergebnisse, dass der CD4+ T-Lymphozytenwert bei Studien zu Immunmodulatoren kein verlässlicher Surrogatmarker für die Progression ist (Abrams, Levy et al. 2009). In der vorliegenden Arbeit sollte untersucht werden, ob sich zum Einen der stabilisierende Effekt von niedrig dosiertem Prednisolon (5 mg pro Tag) auf CD4+ T-Lymphozyten in einer kontrollierten Studie bestätigt, ob zum Zweiten die CD4+ T-Lymphozytenstabilisierung auf eine Senkung der Immunaktivierung zurückgeführt werden kann und ob zum Dritten die CD4+ TLymphozytenstabilisierung die klinische Krankheitsprogression verlangsamt. Im Rahmen der ProCort-Studie sollte außerdem eine Bestimmung der Prävalenz medikamentenresistenter HIV-Infektionen bei ART unbehandelten Patienten erfolgen. Hierbei wurden die WHO Kriterien überprüft, die als Einschlusskriterien für Patienten in Resistenz-Überwachungsstudien ein Höchstalter von 25 Jahren festgelegt hat. In unserer Untersuchung wurden demgegenüber Proben von Patienten mit höherem Alter und bereits therapierten Partnern analysiert.Methoden: Im Rahmen einer doppelblinden randomisierten klinischen Studie (ProCort1) im Bugando Medical Center (BMC) in Mwanza, Tansania, wurden 326 HIV-Patienten eingeschlossen, die zuvor noch nie mit ART behandelt wurden und einen CD4+ TLymphozytenwert von mindestens 300/μl aufwiesen. In 14 Visiten wurden, während einer zweijährigen Behandlungsdauer entweder mit 5mg Prednisolon täglich oder mit Placebo, die CD4+ T-Lymphozytenwerte und das Auftreten von Progression der HIV-Infektion bestimmt. Primärer Studienendpunkt war die Krankheitsprogression, definiert als ein Unterschreiten von 200 CD4-Zellen/μl oder dem Auftreten AIDS-definierender Erkrankungen. Um die immunologische Wirkungsweise von Prednisolon in HIV-infizierten Patienten zu untersuchen wurden sowohl in den tansanischen Studienpatienten als auch in einer mit 5 mg Prednisolon behandelten deutschen Kohorte die Lymphozytenaktivierungsmarker CD38/HLADR auf CD3/CD8-Zellen, der Monozytenaktivierungsmarker sCD14 und der Entzündungsmarker suPAR bestimmt. Um die Prävalenz der HIV Medikamentenresistenz (HIVDR) in der ProCort Studienpopulation zu ermitteln wurden 88 Proben der ART unbehandelten Patienten sequenziert. Ergebnisse: Die Ergebnisse der ProCort Studie zeigten eine statistisch signifikante Stabilisierung der CD4+ T-Lymphozytenwerte im Vergleich zum Ausgangswert durch Einsatz einer niedrig dosierten Prednisolonbehandlung (5 mg täglich). In der Intent to treat Analyse wurde ein Zugewinn von +20,1 Zellen/μl pro Jahr für den Prednisolonarm (p < 0.0001) im Vergleich zu -54,2 Zellen/μl pro Jahr für den Placeboarm (p < 0.0001) bestimmt. Die CD4+ T-Lymphozytenwerte zum Zeitpunkt der Startvisite waren im Prednisolonarm statistisch signifikant niedriger (Mean 512.14 Zellen/μl ± S.E.M. 13.39) als im Placeboarm (Mean 554.40 ± S.E.M 15.75; p = 0.042). Dies bedeutet eine schlechtere Ausgangslage für die mit Prednisolon behandelten Patienten. Trotzdem entwickelten nur vier Patienten mit Prednisolonbehandlung im Vergleich zu 11 Patienten mit Placebobehandlung AIDS, was eine statistisch signifikante Verringerung der Progressionsrate bedeutet (p=0.0196). In 16 Patienten versus 18 Patienten fielen die CD4+ T-Lymphozytenwerte unter die Werte von 200 Zellen/μl. Die Behandlung mit Prednisolon war nicht mit einer höheren Rate von unerwünschten Ereignissen oder höherer Viruslast assoziiert. N2 - Background: A combination-therapy approach with antiretroviral substances (ARVs), also called antiretroviral therapy (ART) is at present, the best and almost the only treatment option for HIV infected individuals. While combination ART is the best treatment to prevent the onset of AIDS in HIV infection, it is still not available for millions of patients in resourcelimited areas, despite the substantial improvements achieved in the past 10 years. There is a justified concern of the acceleration of HIV-drug-resistance (HIVDR) development caused by first-line ART medication available in countries with restricted resources, as the ART available often has low genetic barriers causing resistance mutations (Barth, Wensing et al. 2008). There is a strong need for treatment that is inexpensive and effective of delaying the progress of the illness in the asymptomatic phase. HIV-associated general immune activation is a strong predictor for HIV disease progression, suggesting that chronic immune activation may drive HIV pathogenesis (Sousa, Carneiro et al. 2002; Hazenberg, Otto et al. 2003). Therefore immunomodulating agents like the corticosteroid prednisolone may decelerate HIV disease progression. This is the rationale for the use of prednisolone in HIV therapy. In nonrandomised monocentric observational studies it was shown that certain corticosteroids has a stabilizing effect on the CD4+T-lymphocytes in HIV-infected patients (Andrieu, Lu et al. 1995; Lu, Salerno-Goncalves et al. 1995). This effect could also be proven with low dose prednisolone (5 mg daily) (Ulmer, Muller et al. 2005). However, recent studies demonstrate that the CD4+T-lymphocytes are not stable predicting markers for HIV progression (Abrams, Levy et al. 2009). This thesis examines, first if the CD4+T-lymphocytes stabilizing effect of 5 mg prednisolone can be proven in a double-blind controlled randomized clinical trial, second if this effect is dependent of the reducing generalized immune activation and third if the CD4+T-lymphocytes stabilizing effect reduces the clinical progression of HIV infection. A study to identify the prevalence of HIVDR was also conducted within the ProCort study. To validate the current WHO tHIVDR survey criteria, focused on patients age below 25 years, our study included also patients over 25 years with partners already on treatment as well. Methods:The ProCort Study (Progression of HIV-Disease under Low Dose Corticosteroids) was designed as a double blinded randomized clinical trial including 326 ART-naïve patients in Bugando Medical Centre in Mwanza, Tansania, with a minimum cell count of 300 CD4+Tlymphocytes per μl. Patients were treated with either 5mg prednisolone daily or with placebo for two years. The CD4+T-lymphocytes were measured in 14 visits and progression factors were evaluated. Progression was defined as qualifying for start of ART either due to CD4 Cell 11 count below 200 cells per μl or due to developing AIDS defining symptoms. Immune activation markers were determined both for the ProCort patients and for a German cohortstudy group receiving 5 mg Prednisolon. The lymphocyte activation marker CD3/CD8/CD38/HLADR, monocyte activation marker sCD14 and markers for inflammation suPAR was targeted during the study. To identify the HIVDR in the ProCort study population sequencing was conducted in 88 sequentially enrolled ART-naïve patients. Results:The results of the ProCort study showed a statistical significant stabilizing effect of CD4+T-lymphocyte count compared to baseline counts in 5 mg prednisolone treated patients. In an intent-to-treat analysis, average changes in CD4+T-lymphocyte counts versus baseline were +20,1 cells/μl per year for prednisolone (P = 0.0002) and -54,2 cells/μl per year for placebo (P = 0.0027). The Baseline CD4+T-lymphocyte count recovery were significantly lower in the prednisolone arm (mean 512.14 cells/μl ± S.E.M. 13.39) than in the placebo arm (554.40 ± 15.75 P = 0.042) which implies a disadvantage for this group. However, only four patients treated with prednisolone and 11 patients treated with placebo developed stage C opportunistic diseases (Kaplan Meyer analysis, p = 0.0196 Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test). For the CD4+T-lymphocyte counts 16 patients, compared to 18 patients in the placebo group? fall under 200 cell/μl. Prednisolone treatment was not associated with an increase in adverse events or HIV viral load. A statistically significant reduction in immune activation markers were obtained by 5 mg prednisolone therapy in both the German and the Tanzanian study group. In the Tanzanian study group the lymphocyte activation change to baseline, determined by CD38/HLADR-expression on CD8+ T lymphocytes, showed a significantly reduction of activation in prednisolone-treated patients compared to an increase in the untreated patients (-4.101% compared to 2.637%, p = 0.0018). The analysis of the immune system activation markers for inflammation (suPAR) showed a significant reduced difference to baseline in prednisolone-treated patients compared to untreated patients (-0.147 ng/ml, compared to 0,325 ng/ml, p<0.0001). In the results for monocytes activation markers for soluble CD14 just failed the significant difference between prednisolone and placebo treated patients (4.030 ng/ml, vs. 3.513 ng/ml, p=0.062). In the German Study cohort lymphocyte activation determined by CD38-expression on CD8+ T lymphocytes was significantly lower in prednisolone-treated patients compared to untreated patients (55.40% versus 73.34%, p = 0.0011). Similarly, we detected for monocyte activation markers lower levels of sCD14 (3.6 ng/ml vs. 6.11 ng/ml, p = 0.0048), and of LBP (2.18 ng/ml compared to 3.45 ng/ml; p = 0.0386) and for inflammation markers suPAR antigen (2.17 ng/ml vs. 2.56 ng/ml, p = towards lower levels of sCD40L (2.70 pg/ml vs. 3.60 pg/ml, p = 0.0782). 12 Viral load in both groups were similar (0.8 x 105 copies/ml compared to 1.1 x 105 copies/ml, p = 0.3806) (Kasang, Ulmer et al. 2012). By sequencing the HIV samples of ProCort patients we identified the HIV-1 subtype frequency A1: 34%, A1D: 7%, C: 26%, CRF10_CD: 4%, D: 28%, B: 1%. Twenty patients of the 88 were aged <25 years (meeting the WHO-initiated transmitted HIVDR surveillance criteria) and 68 patients were aged 25–63 years. The frequency of HIVDR in the study population was 14.8% (95%; CI 0.072–0.223) and independent of NVP-resistance induced by prevention of mother-to-child transmission programs. Patients >25 years had a significantly higher HIVDR frequency than younger patients (19.1%, versus 0%, P = 0.0344). ART-naïve patients aged over 25 years exhibited significantly higher HIVDR than younger patients. Detection of traces of ARVs in individuals with HIVDR suggests that besides transmission, undisclosed misuse of ARVs may constitute a significant factor in the generation of the observed high HIVDR rate. Discussion: The results in the context of the ProCort Study showed that treatment with 5 mg per day prednisolone for two years in ART-naive HIV patients is safe in an African setting and was associated with a significant increase of CD4+T-lymphocyte counts compared to the placebo group. In addition, prednis olone-treated patients developed significantly fewer AIDSdefining conditions, indicating that prednisolone slows HIV disease progression. This can be explained by the justified reduction of general immune activation in low-dose prednisolone treated patients. We suggest low-dose prednisolone as a treatment option for asymptomatic HIV infection in resource-limited settings. Additionally it should be clarified if low-dose prednisolone therapy is also an option for an ART combined treatment. So far, the reported prevalence of HIVDR in eligible patient populations is below 5% across Sub-Saharan Africa (WHO 2012). Our study identified that patients over 25 years of age showed a significant higher prevalence of HIVDR than younger patients (p=0.0344). By phylogenetic alignment for two samples of treated partners and untreated patients we demonstrate a transmission of HIVDR probably achieved by treatment to the therapy naïve patient. Detection of traces of ARVs in some other individuals with HIVDR suggests that besides transmission, undisclosed misuse of ARVs may constitute a significant factor in the generation of the observed high HIVDR rate. The current WHO HIVDR survey that is solely focused on the transmission of HIVDR and that excludes patients over 25 years of age may therefore result in substantial underestimation of the prevalence of HIVDR in the therapynaïve population. A modification of WHO HIVDR survey criteria is strongly recommended KW - Retroviren KW - HIV KW - Tansania KW - Immunsystem KW - Resistenz KW - AIDS KW - Prednisolon KW - Glucocorticosteroide KW - Immunaktivierung KW - HIVDR KW - klinische Studie KW - Tanzania KW - HIV KW - Immunactivation KW - Resistances KW - Prednisolone Y1 - 2013 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-85638 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Rudovick, Ladius A1 - Brauner, Jan M. A1 - Englert, Johanna A1 - Seemann, Carolina A1 - Plugaru, Karina A1 - Kidenya, Benson R. A1 - Kalluvya, Samuel E. A1 - Scheller, Carsten A1 - Kasang, Christa T1 - Prevalence of pretreatment HIV drug resistance in Mwanza, Tanzania JF - Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy N2 - Background: In a 2008-10 study, we found a pretreatment HIV drug resistance (PDR) prevalence of 18.2% in patients at Bugando Medical Centre (BMC) in Mwanza, Tanzania. Objectives: To determine the prevalence of PDR and transmitted HIV drug resistance (TDR) in patients visiting the BMC from 2013 to 2015. Methods: Adult outpatients were sequentially enrolled into two groups, separated by whether they were initiating ART. Previous exposure to antiretroviral drugs, except for prevention of mother-to-child transmission, was an exclusion criterion. HIV pol sequences were analysed according to WHO guidelines for surveillance of PDR and TDR. Results: Two hundred and thirty-five sequences were analysed (138 ART initiators, 97 non-initiators). The prevalence of PDR was 4.7% (95% CI 2.6%-8.2%) overall, 3.1% (95% CI 1.1%-8.7%) for non-initiators and 5.8% (95% CI 3.0%-11.0%) for ART initiators. PDR to NNRTIs and nucleoside or nucelotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors was found in 3.0% (95% CI 1.5%-6.0%) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.7%-4.3%) of patients, respectively. Resistance to PIs was not observed. The prevalence of TDR was 6.0% (95% CI 3.6%-9.8%). Conclusions: Prevalence of PDR significantly decreased compared with 2008-10 and was below the WHO-defined threshold for triggering a public health response. National and systematic surveillance is needed to inform Tanzania's public health strategy. KW - HIV KW - adult KW - anti-hiv agents KW - child KW - mothers KW - nucleosides KW - outpatients KW - reverse transcriptase inhibitors KW - tanzania KW - world health organization KW - guidelines KW - public health medicine KW - anti-retroviral agents KW - non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors KW - surveillance KW - medical KW - exclusion criteria KW - prevention Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-227124 VL - 73 IS - 12 ER -