TY - JOUR A1 - Breeze, Tom D. A1 - Vaissiere, Bernhard E. A1 - Bommarco, Riccardo A1 - Petanidou, Theodora A1 - Seraphides, Nicos A1 - Kozak, Lajos A1 - Scheper, Jeroen A1 - Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. A1 - Kleijn, David A1 - Gyldenkærne, Steen A1 - Moretti, Marco A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf A1 - Stout, Jane C. A1 - Pärtel, Meelis A1 - Zobel, Martin A1 - Potts, Simon G. T1 - Agricultural Policies Exacerbate Honeybee Pollination Service Supply-Demand Mismatches Across Europe JF - PLOS ONE N2 - Declines in insect pollinators across Europe have raised concerns about the supply of pollination services to agriculture. Simultaneously, EU agricultural and biofuel policies have encouraged substantial growth in the cultivated area of insect pollinated crops across the continent. Using data from 41 European countries, this study demonstrates that the recommended number of honeybees required to provide crop pollination across Europe has risen 4.9 times as fast as honeybee stocks between 2005 and 2010. Consequently, honeybee stocks were insufficient to supply >90% of demands in 22 countries studied. These findings raise concerns about the capacity of many countries to cope with major losses of wild pollinators and highlight numerous critical gaps in current understanding of pollination service supplies and demands, pointing to a pressing need for further research into this issue. KW - economy services KW - fruit set KW - sequential introduction KW - enhance KW - biodiversity KW - abundance KW - declines KW - crops KW - colonies KW - density Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-117692 SN - 1932-6203 VL - 9 IS - 1 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Viljur, Mari‐Liis A1 - Abella, Scott R. A1 - Adámek, Martin A1 - Alencar, Janderson Batista Rodrigues A1 - Barber, Nicholas A. A1 - Beudert, Burkhard A1 - Burkle, Laura A. A1 - Cagnolo, Luciano A1 - Campos, Brent R. A1 - Chao, Anne A1 - Chergui, Brahim A1 - Choi, Chang‐Yong A1 - Cleary, Daniel F. R. A1 - Davis, Thomas Seth A1 - Dechnik‐Vázquez, Yanus A. A1 - Downing, William M. A1 - Fuentes‐Ramirez, Andrés A1 - Gandhi, Kamal J. K. A1 - Gehring, Catherine A1 - Georgiev, Kostadin B. A1 - Gimbutas, Mark A1 - Gongalsky, Konstantin B. A1 - Gorbunova, Anastasiya Y. A1 - Greenberg, Cathryn H. A1 - Hylander, Kristoffer A1 - Jules, Erik S. A1 - Korobushkin, Daniil I. A1 - Köster, Kajar A1 - Kurth, Valerie A1 - Lanham, Joseph Drew A1 - Lazarina, Maria A1 - Leverkus, Alexandro B. A1 - Lindenmayer, David A1 - Marra, Daniel Magnabosco A1 - Martín‐Pinto, Pablo A1 - Meave, Jorge A. A1 - Moretti, Marco A1 - Nam, Hyun‐Young A1 - Obrist, Martin K. A1 - Petanidou, Theodora A1 - Pons, Pere A1 - Potts, Simon G. A1 - Rapoport, Irina B. A1 - Rhoades, Paul R. A1 - Richter, Clark A1 - Saifutdinov, Ruslan A. A1 - Sanders, Nathan J. A1 - Santos, Xavier A1 - Steel, Zachary A1 - Tavella, Julia A1 - Wendenburg, Clara A1 - Wermelinger, Beat A1 - Zaitsev, Andrey S. A1 - Thorn, Simon T1 - The effect of natural disturbances on forest biodiversity: an ecological synthesis JF - Biological Reviews N2 - Disturbances alter biodiversity via their specific characteristics, including severity and extent in the landscape, which act at different temporal and spatial scales. Biodiversity response to disturbance also depends on the community characteristics and habitat requirements of species. Untangling the mechanistic interplay of these factors has guided disturbance ecology for decades, generating mixed scientific evidence of biodiversity responses to disturbance. Understanding the impact of natural disturbances on biodiversity is increasingly important due to human‐induced changes in natural disturbance regimes. In many areas, major natural forest disturbances, such as wildfires, windstorms, and insect outbreaks, are becoming more frequent, intense, severe, and widespread due to climate change and land‐use change. Conversely, the suppression of natural disturbances threatens disturbance‐dependent biota. Using a meta‐analytic approach, we analysed a global data set (with most sampling concentrated in temperate and boreal secondary forests) of species assemblages of 26 taxonomic groups, including plants, animals, and fungi collected from forests affected by wildfires, windstorms, and insect outbreaks. The overall effect of natural disturbances on α‐diversity did not differ significantly from zero, but some taxonomic groups responded positively to disturbance, while others tended to respond negatively. Disturbance was beneficial for taxonomic groups preferring conditions associated with open canopies (e.g. hymenopterans and hoverflies), whereas ground‐dwelling groups and/or groups typically associated with shady conditions (e.g. epigeic lichens and mycorrhizal fungi) were more likely to be negatively impacted by disturbance. Across all taxonomic groups, the highest α‐diversity in disturbed forest patches occurred under moderate disturbance severity, i.e. with approximately 55% of trees killed by disturbance. We further extended our meta‐analysis by applying a unified diversity concept based on Hill numbers to estimate α‐diversity changes in different taxonomic groups across a gradient of disturbance severity measured at the stand scale and incorporating other disturbance features. We found that disturbance severity negatively affected diversity for Hill number q = 0 but not for q = 1 and q = 2, indicating that diversity–disturbance relationships are shaped by species relative abundances. Our synthesis of α‐diversity was extended by a synthesis of disturbance‐induced change in species assemblages, and revealed that disturbance changes the β‐diversity of multiple taxonomic groups, including some groups that were not affected at the α‐diversity level (birds and woody plants). Finally, we used mixed rarefaction/extrapolation to estimate biodiversity change as a function of the proportion of forests that were disturbed, i.e. the disturbance extent measured at the landscape scale. The comparison of intact and naturally disturbed forests revealed that both types of forests provide habitat for unique species assemblages, whereas species diversity in the mixture of disturbed and undisturbed forests peaked at intermediate values of disturbance extent in the simulated landscape. Hence, the relationship between α‐diversity and disturbance severity in disturbed forest stands was strikingly similar to the relationship between species richness and disturbance extent in a landscape consisting of both disturbed and undisturbed forest habitats. This result suggests that both moderate disturbance severity and moderate disturbance extent support the highest levels of biodiversity in contemporary forest landscapes. KW - natural disturbance KW - diversity–disturbance relationship KW - disturbance severity KW - disturbance extent KW - intermediate disturbance hypothesis KW - forest communities KW - α‐diversity KW - β‐diversity Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-287168 VL - 97 IS - 5 SP - 1930 EP - 1947 ER -