TY - JOUR A1 - Neuhoff, Nina A1 - Bruder, Jennifer A1 - Bartling, Jürgen A1 - Warnke, Andreas A1 - Remschmidt, Helmut A1 - Müller-Myhsok, Bertram A1 - Schulte-Körne, Gerd T1 - Evidence for the Late MMN as a Neurophysiological Endophenotype for Dyslexia JF - PLoS One N2 - Dyslexia affects 5-10% of school-aged children and is therefore one of the most common learning disorders. Research on auditory event related potentials (AERP), particularly the mismatch negativity (MMN) component, has revealed anomalies in individuals with dyslexia to speech stimuli. Furthermore, candidate genes for this disorder were found through molecular genetic studies. A current challenge for dyslexia research is to understand the interaction between molecular genetics and brain function, and to promote the identification of relevant endophenotypes for dyslexia. The present study examines MMN, a neurophysiological correlate of speech perception, and its potential as an endophenotype for dyslexia in three groups of children. The first group of children was clinically diagnosed with dyslexia, whereas the second group of children was comprised of their siblings who had average reading and spelling skills and were therefore "unaffected'' despite having a genetic risk for dyslexia. The third group consisted of control children who were not related to the other groups and were also unaffected. In total, 225 children were included in the study. All children showed clear MMN activity to/da/-/ba/ contrasts that could be separated into three distinct MMN components. Whilst the first two MMN components did not differentiate the groups, the late MMN component (300-700 ms) revealed significant group differences. The mean area of the late MMN was attenuated in both the dyslexic children and their unaffected siblings in comparison to the control children. This finding is indicative of analogous alterations of neurophysiological processes in children with dyslexia and those with a genetic risk for dyslexia, without a manifestation of the disorder. The present results therefore further suggest that the late MMN might be a potential endophenotype for dyslexia. KW - processing deficits KW - children KW - event-related potentials KW - mismatch negativity mmn KW - developmental dyslexia KW - reading disability KW - auditory discrimination KW - susceptibility gene KW - speech perception KW - novelty detection Y1 - 2012 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-133686 VL - 7 IS - 5 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hautmann, Christopher A1 - Döpfner, Manfred A1 - Katzmann, Josepha A1 - Schürmann, Stephanie A1 - Wolff Metternich-Kaizman, Tanja A1 - Jaite, Charlotte A1 - Kappel, Viola A1 - Geissler, Julia A1 - Warnke, Andreas A1 - Jacob, Christian A1 - Hennighausen, Klaus A1 - Haack-Dees, Barbara A1 - Schneider-Momm, Katja A1 - Philipsen, Alexandra A1 - Matthies, Swantje A1 - Rösler, Michael A1 - Retz, Wolfgang A1 - Gontard, Alexander von A1 - Sobanski, Esther A1 - Alm, Barbara A1 - Hohmann, Sarah A1 - Häge, Alexander A1 - Poustka, Luise A1 - Colla, Michael A1 - Gentschow, Laura A1 - Freitag, Christine M. A1 - Becker, Katja A1 - Jans, Thomas T1 - Sequential treatment of ADHD in mother and child (AIMAC study): importance of the treatment phases for intervention success in a randomized trial JF - BMC Psychiatry N2 - Background The efficacy of parent-child training (PCT) regarding child symptoms may be reduced if the mother has attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The AIMAC study (ADHD in Mothers and Children) aimed to compensate for the deteriorating effect of parental psychopathology by treating the mother (Step 1) before the beginning of PCT (Step 2). This secondary analysis was particularly concerned with the additional effect of the Step 2 PCT on child symptoms after the Step 1 treatment. Methods The analysis included 143 mothers and children (aged 6–12 years) both diagnosed with ADHD. The study design was a two-stage, two-arm parallel group trial (Step 1 treatment group [TG]: intensive treatment of the mother including psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy; Step 1 control group [CG]: supportive counseling only for mother; Step 2 TG and CG: PCT). Single- and multi-group analyses with piecewise linear latent growth curve models were applied to test for the effects of group and phase. Child symptoms (e.g., ADHD symptoms, disruptive behavior) were rated by three informants (blinded clinician, mother, teacher). Results Children in the TG showed a stronger improvement of their disruptive behavior as rated by mothers than those in the CG during Step 1 (Step 1: TG vs. CG). In the CG, according to reports of the blinded clinician and the mother, the reduction of children’s disruptive behavior was stronger during Step 2 than during Step 1 (CG: Step 1 vs. Step 2). In the TG, improvement of child outcome did not differ across treatment steps (TG: Step 1 vs. Step 2). Conclusions Intensive treatment of the mother including pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy may have small positive effects on the child’s disruptive behavior. PCT may be a valid treatment option for children with ADHD regarding disruptive behavior, even if mothers are not intensively treated beforehand. Trial registration ISRCTN registry ISRCTN73911400. Registered 29 March 2007. KW - mothers KW - children KW - adult treatment KW - parent training KW - efficacy Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-227930 VL - 18 ER -