TY - JOUR A1 - Herrmann, Johannes A1 - Lotz, Christopher A1 - Karagiannidis, Christian A1 - Weber-Carstens, Steffen A1 - Kluge, Stefan A1 - Putensen, Christian A1 - Wehrfritz, Andreas A1 - Schmidt, Karsten A1 - Ellerkmann, Richard K. A1 - Oswald, Daniel A1 - Lotz, Gösta A1 - Zotzmann, Viviane A1 - Moerer, Onnen A1 - Kühn, Christian A1 - Kochanek, Matthias A1 - Muellenbach, Ralf A1 - Gaertner, Matthias A1 - Fichtner, Falk A1 - Brettner, Florian A1 - Findeisen, Michael A1 - Heim, Markus A1 - Lahmer, Tobias A1 - Rosenow, Felix A1 - Haake, Nils A1 - Lepper, Philipp M. A1 - Rosenberger, Peter A1 - Braune, Stephan A1 - Kohls, Mirjam A1 - Heuschmann, Peter A1 - Meybohm, Patrick T1 - Key characteristics impacting survival of COVID-19 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation JF - Critical Care N2 - Background Severe COVID-19 induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) often requires extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Recent German health insurance data revealed low ICU survival rates. Patient characteristics and experience of the ECMO center may determine intensive care unit (ICU) survival. The current study aimed to identify factors affecting ICU survival of COVID-19 ECMO patients. Methods 673 COVID-19 ARDS ECMO patients treated in 26 centers between January 1st 2020 and March 22nd 2021 were included. Data on clinical characteristics, adjunct therapies, complications, and outcome were documented. Block wise logistic regression analysis was applied to identify variables associated with ICU-survival. Results Most patients were between 50 and 70 years of age. PaO\(_{2}\)/FiO\(_{2}\) ratio prior to ECMO was 72 mmHg (IQR: 58–99). ICU survival was 31.4%. Survival was significantly lower during the 2nd wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A subgroup of 284 (42%) patients fulfilling modified EOLIA criteria had a higher survival (38%) (p = 0.0014, OR 0.64 (CI 0.41–0.99)). Survival differed between low, intermediate, and high-volume centers with 20%, 30%, and 38%, respectively (p = 0.0024). Treatment in high volume centers resulted in an odds ratio of 0.55 (CI 0.28–1.02) compared to low volume centers. Additional factors associated with survival were younger age, shorter time between intubation and ECMO initiation, BMI > 35 (compared to < 25), absence of renal replacement therapy or major bleeding/thromboembolic events. Conclusions Structural and patient-related factors, including age, comorbidities and ECMO case volume, determined the survival of COVID-19 ECMO. These factors combined with a more liberal ECMO indication during the 2nd wave may explain the reasonably overall low survival rate. Careful selection of patients and treatment in high volume ECMO centers was associated with higher odds of ICU survival. KW - Covid-19 KW - extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) KW - intensive care unit Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-299686 VL - 26 IS - 1 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Vollmuth, Christoph A1 - Muljukov, Olga A1 - Abu-Mugheisib, Mazen A1 - Angermeier, Anselm A1 - Barlinn, Jessica A1 - Busetto, Loraine A1 - Grau, Armin J. A1 - Günther, Albrecht A1 - Gumbinger, Christoph A1 - Hubert, Nikolai A1 - Hüttemann, Katrin A1 - Klingner, Carsten A1 - Naumann, Markus A1 - Palm, Frederick A1 - Remi, Jan A1 - Rücker, Viktoria A1 - Schessl, Joachim A1 - Schlachetzki, Felix A1 - Schuppner, Ramona A1 - Schwab, Stefan A1 - Schwartz, Andreas A1 - Trommer, Adrian A1 - Urbanek, Christian A1 - Volbers, Bastian A1 - Weber, Joachim A1 - Wojciechowski, Claudia A1 - Worthmann, Hans A1 - Zickler, Philipp A1 - Heuschmann, Peter U. A1 - Haeusler, Karl Georg A1 - Hubert, Gordian Jan T1 - Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on stroke teleconsultations in Germany in the first half of 2020 JF - European Journal of Neurology N2 - Background and purpose The effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on telemedical care have not been described on a national level. Thus, we investigated the medical stroke treatment situation before, during, and after the first lockdown in Germany. Methods In this nationwide, multicenter study, data from 14 telemedical networks including 31 network centers and 155 spoke hospitals covering large parts of Germany were analyzed regarding patients' characteristics, stroke type/severity, and acute stroke treatment. A survey focusing on potential shortcomings of in-hospital and (telemedical) stroke care during the pandemic was conducted. Results Between January 2018 and June 2020, 67,033 telemedical consultations and 38,895 telemedical stroke consultations were conducted. A significant decline of telemedical (p < 0.001) and telemedical stroke consultations (p < 0.001) during the lockdown in March/April 2020 and a reciprocal increase after relaxation of COVID-19 measures in May/June 2020 were observed. Compared to 2018–2019, neither stroke patients' age (p = 0.38), gender (p = 0.44), nor severity of ischemic stroke (p = 0.32) differed in March/April 2020. Whereas the proportion of ischemic stroke patients for whom endovascular treatment (14.3% vs. 14.6%; p = 0.85) was recommended remained stable, there was a nonsignificant trend toward a lower proportion of recommendation of intravenous thrombolysis during the lockdown (19.0% vs. 22.1%; p = 0.052). Despite the majority of participating network centers treating patients with COVID-19, there were no relevant shortcomings reported regarding in-hospital stroke treatment or telemedical stroke care. Conclusions Telemedical stroke care in Germany was able to provide full service despite the COVID-19 pandemic, but telemedical consultations declined abruptly during the lockdown period and normalized after relaxation of COVID-19 measures in Germany. KW - COVID-19 KW - SARS-CoV- 2 KW - stroke KW - telemedicine KW - survey Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-259396 VL - 28 IS - 10 ER -