TY - THES A1 - Gromer, Daniel T1 - Mechanisms Underlying Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Specific Phobias T1 - Wirkmechanismen der Expositionstherapie in virtueller Realität bei spezifischen Phobien N2 - Virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) is an effective cognitive-behavioral treatment for anxiety disorders that comprises systematic confrontations to virtual representations of feared stimuli and situations. However, not all patients respond to VRET, and some patients relapse after successful treatment. One explanation for this limitation of VRET is that its underlying mechanisms are not yet fully understood, leaving room for further improvement. On these grounds, the present thesis aimed to investigate two major research questions: first, it explored how virtual stimuli induce fear responses in height-fearful participants, and second, it tested if VRET outcome could be improved by incorporating techniques derived from two different theories of exposure therapy. To this end, five studies in virtual reality (VR) were conducted. Study 1 (N = 99) established a virtual environment for height exposure using a Computer Automatic Virtual Environment (CAVE) and investigated the effects of tactile wind simulation in VR. Height-fearful and non-fearful participants climbed a virtual outlook, and half of the participants received wind simulation. Results revealed that height-fearful participants showed stronger fear responses, on both a subjective and behavioral level, and that wind simulation increased subjective fear. However, adding tactile wind simulation in VR did not affect presence, the user's sense of 'being there' in the virtual environment. Replicating previous studies, fear and presence in VR were correlated, and the correlation was higher in height-fearful compared to non-fearful participants. Study 2 (N = 43) sought to corroborate the findings of the first study, using a different VR system for exposure (a head-mounted display) and measuring physiological fear responses. In addition, the effects of a visual cognitive distractor on fear in VR were investigated. Participants' fear responses were evident on both a subjective and physiological level---although much more pronounced on skin conductance than on heart rate---but the virtual distractor did not affect the strength of fear responses. In Study 3 (N = 50), the effects of trait height-fearfulness and height level on fear responses were investigated in more detail. Self-rated level of acrophobia and five different height levels in VR (1 m--20 m) were used as linear predictors of subjective and physiological indices of fear. Results showed that subjective fear and skin conductance responses were a function of both trait height-fearfulness and height level, whereas no clear effects were visible for heart rate. Study 4 (N = 64 + N = 49) aimed to advance the understanding of the relationship between presence and fear in VR. Previous research indicates a positive correlation between both measures, but possible causal mechanisms have not yet been identified. The study was the first to experimentally manipulate both presence (via the visual and auditive realism of the virtual environment) and fear (by presenting both height and control situations). Results indicated a causal effect of fear on presence, i.e., experiencing fear in a virtual environment led to a stronger sense of `being there' in the virtual environment. However, conversely, presence increased by higher scene realism did not affect fear responses. Nonetheless, presence seemed to have some effects on fear responding via another pathway, as participants whose presence levels were highest in the first safe context were also those who had the strongest fear responses in a later height situation. This finding indicated the importance of immersive user characteristics in the emergence of presence and fear in VR. The findings of the first four studies were integrated into a model of fear in VR, extending previous models and highlighting factors that lead to the emergence of both fear and presence in VR. Results of the studies showed that fear responses towards virtual heights were affected by trait height-fearfulness, phobic elements in the virtual environment, and, at least to some degree, on presence. Presence, on the other hand, was affected by experiencing fear in VR, immersion---the characteristics of the VR system---and immersive user characteristics. Of note, the manipulations of immersion used in the present thesis, visual and auditory realism of the virtual environment and tactile wind simulation, were not particularly effective in manipulating presence. Finally, Study 5 (N = 34) compared two different implementations of VRET for acrophobia to investigate mechanisms underlying its efficacy. The first implementation followed the Emotional Processing Theory, assuming that fear reduction during exposure is crucial for positive treatment outcome. In this condition, patients were asked to focus on their fear responses and on the decline of fear (habituation) during exposures. The second implementation was based on the inhibitory learning model, assuming that expectancy violation is the primary mechanism underlying exposure therapy efficacy. In this condition, patients were asked to focus on the non-occurrence of feared outcomes (e.g., 'I could fall off') during exposure. Based on predictions of the inhibitory learning model, the hypothesis for the study was that expectancy-violation-based exposure would outperform habituation-based exposure. After two treatment sessions in VR, both treatment conditions effectively reduced the patients' fear of heights, but the two conditions did not differ in their efficacy. The study replicated previous studies by showing that VRET is an effective treatment for acrophobia; however, contrary to the assumption, explicitly targeting the violation of threat expectancies did not improve outcome. This finding adds to other studies failing to provide clear evidence for expectancy violation as the primary mechanism underlying exposure therapy. Possible explanations for this finding and clinical implications are discussed, along with suggestions for further research. N2 - Die Expositionstherapie in virtueller Realität (VRET) ist ein wirksames kognitiv-verhaltenstherapeutisches Verfahren zur Behandlung von Angststörungen. Bei einer VRET werden Patienten nach psychoedukativer Vorbereitung mit virtuellen Repräsentationen der von ihnen gefürchteten Objekte oder Situationen konfrontiert. Die VRET zeigt allerdings nicht bei allen Patienten die gewünschte Wirksamkeit, und einige Patienten erleben selbst nach erfolgreicher Therapie eine Rückkehr der Angst. Da die zugrunde liegenden Wirkfaktoren der VRET noch nicht ausreichend aufgeklärt sind, lässt sich ihre Effektivtät möglicherweise noch weiter verbessern. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war es daher zwei Fragen zu untersuchen. Zum einen, wie genau virtuelle Reize Furchtreaktionen bei höhenängstlichen Personen auslösen, und zum anderen, ob sich VRET durch den Einsatz spezifischer Techniken, welche aus Theorien zur Expositionstherapie abgeleitet wurden, verbessern lässt. Um die Fragen zu beantworten, wurden im Rahmen der Dissertation fünf Studien durchgeführt. In Studie 1 (N = 99) wurde eine virtuelle Umgebung für Höhenexposition etabliert und Effekte von taktiler Windsimulation in virtueller Realität (VR) untersucht. In der Studie hatten höhenängstliche und nicht-ängstliche Probanden die Aufgabe einen virtuellen Turm zu besteigen, wobei die Hälfte der Probanden währenddessen eine Windsimulation dargeboten bekam. Die Ergebnisse zeigten, dass höhenängstliche Probanden stärkere Furchtreaktionen zeigten, was sich sowohl im Bericht als auch im Verhalten äußerte. Zusätzlich erhöhte die Windsimulation die subjektiv Furcht der Probanden. Die Windsimulation hatte allerdings keinen Einfluss auf das Präsenzerleben, d. h. wie sehr sich Probanden so gefühlt hatten als seien sie tatsächlich in der virtuellen Umgebung gewesen. In der Studie konnten darüber hinaus zwei Befunde vorheriger Studien zum Präsenzerleben repliziert werden. Furcht und Präsenz korrelierten positiv, und dieser Zusammenhang war bei höhenängstlichen Probanden stärker als bei nicht-ängstlichen Probanden. Die Studie konnte zeigen, dass sich VR eignet um Furcht auf verschiedenen Reaktionsebenen zu untersuchen und es darüber hinaus möglich ist, Furcht in VR experimentell zu manipulieren. In Studie 2 (N = 43) sollten die Ergebnisse der ersten Studie bestätigt werden. Hierfür wurden ein anderes VR-System für die Exposition eingesetzt sowie die Erfassung von Furchtreaktionen um physiologische Maße ergänzt. Zusätzlich wurde der Einfluss einer visuell-kognitiven Distraktionsaufgabe in VR auf Furchtreaktionen untersucht. Die Furchtreaktionen der Probanden zeigten sich sowohl auf subjektiver als auch physiologischer Ebene, wobei Reaktionen der Hautleitfähigkeit stärker ausgeprägt waren als Veränderungen der Herzrate. Ein Einfluss der ablenkenden visuell-kognitiven Aufgabe auf Furchtreaktionen konnte nicht gezeigt werden. Die Studie konnte insgesamt verdeutlichen, dass die Eigenschaft von VR, Furcht zu erzeugen, nicht an einen bestimmten Versuchsaufbau gebunden ist und sich Furcht in VR auf allen Reaktionsebenen zeigt. Studie 3 (N = 50) hatte das Ziel, den Einfluss von Höhenängstlichkeit und Höhe auf Furchreaktionen genauer zu untersuchen. Hierfür wurde per Fragebogen erfasste Höhenängstlichkeit sowie fünf verschiedene Höhen (1 m--20 m) als lineare Prädiktoren für subjektive und physiologische Furchtindizes verwendet. Die Ergebnisse zeigten, dass subjektive Furcht und Hautleitfähigkeitsreaktionen in Abhängigkeit von sowohl Höhenängstlichkeit als auch Höhe zunahmen. Für die Herzrate zeigten sich hingegen keine eindeutigen Effekte. Die Studie konnte zusammenfassend zeigen, dass sich die Furchtreaktionen in VR spezifisch auf Höhe zeigten. In Studie 4 (N = 64 + N = 49) sollte der Zusammenhang zwischen Furcht und Präsenzerleben in VR genauer untersucht werden. Vorangegangene Studien zeigten eine positive Korrelation zwischen beiden Maßen, konnten jedoch keine Aussagen über einen möglichen Kausalzusammenhang machen. Die vorliegende Studie war daher die erste, welche sowohl Präsenz als auch Furcht experimentell manipulierte. Präsenz wurde über die Darbietung unterschiedlich realistischer virtueller Umgebungen, Furcht über die Darbietung von Höhen und Kontrollumgebungen manipuliert. Die Ergebnisse der Studie zeigten, dass es einen kausalen Effekt von Furcht auf Präsenzerleben gab, d. h. das Erleben von Furcht in einer Höhensituation in VR führte zu erhöhtem Präsenzerleben. Umgekehrt gab es jedoch keinen Effekt von experimentell manipuliertem Präsenzerleben auf die Stärke der Furchtreaktion. Es zeigte sich allerdings, dass Personen, welche in der ersten sicheren Situation das stärkste Präsenzerleben berichteten, später auch die stärksten Furchtreaktionen zeigten, was darauf schließen lässt, dass es möglicherwiese dennoch Effekte von Präsenzerleben auf Furcht gibt. Dieses Ergebnis weist auf die Bedeutung von möglichen Persönlichkeitsunterschieden hin, welche für das Erleben von Präsenz und Furcht in VR von Bedeutung sind. Die Studie verdeutlichte damit zum einen die Komplexität des Zusammenhangs zwischen Furcht und Präsenzerleben und erlaubte zum anderen erstmals Kausalschlüsse zwischen beiden Maßen. Die Ergebnisse der ersten vier Studien wurden in einem Modell zur Furcht in VR zusammengefasst. Basierend auf bestehenden Modellen zeigt das neue Modell Faktoren auf, welche für die Entstehung von Furcht und Präsenz bedeutsam sind. So konnten die Studien zeigen, dass Furchtreaktionen in Abhängigkeit von habitueller Höhenangst, der furchtbezogenen Relevanz der virtuellen Umgebung (z. B. Höhe), sowie zum Teil vom Präsenzerleben, auftreten. Bezüglich des Präsenzerlebens betont das Modell die Relevanz von aktuellem Furchterleben, Immersion (den Charakteristika des VR-Systems) und immersiven Nutzercharakteristika (z. B. Absorption). Zu erwähnen ist, dass die in der vorliegenden Dissertation untersuchten Manipulationen von Immersion (visueller und auditiver Realismus der virtuellen Umgebung und taktile Windsimulation) jedoch keine sonderlich starken Effekte auf Präsenz hatten. In Studie 5 (N = 34) wurden abschließend im Rahmen einer Therapiestudie zwei verschiedene VRET-Ansätze miteinander verglichen. Die erste Gruppe von Patienten erhielt hierbei eine Therapie auf Basis der Emotional Processing Theory. In dieser Bedingung wurden die Patienten während der Exposition gebeten, sich auf ihr Furchterleben und dessen Rückgang über die Zeit (Habituation) zu konzentrieren. Die zweite Gruppe von Patienten erhielt eine Therapie auf Basis des Inhibitory Learning Models. In dieser Bedingung wurden die Patienten gebeten, gezielt ihre Befürchtungen (z. B. "Ich könnte herunterfallen") zu überprüfen und zu widerlegen. Es wurde auf Basis der Vorhersage des Inhibitory Learning Models, dass Erwartungswiderlegung der zentrale Wirkfaktor der Expositionstherapie ist, angenommen, dass eine Therapie auf Basis der Widerlegung von Befürchtungen effektiver ist als eine Therapie auf Basis von Habituation. Nach zwei Therapiesitzungen berichteten die Patienten in beiden Gruppen einen signifikaten Rückgang ihrer Höhenangst, es zeigten sich jedoch keine Wirksamkeitsunterschiede zwischen den Gruppen. Die Studie konnte damit zwar vorherige Befunde replizieren, die zeigten, dass VRET eine effektive Behandlung für Höhenangst ist, die spezifische Fokussierung auf Erwartungswiderlegung zeigte jedoch keinen Vorteil. Dieser Befund reiht sich damit in eine Reihe von Studien ein, die Erwartungswiderlegung als zentralen Wirkfaktor der Expositionstherapie nicht nachweisen konnten. Mögliche Gründe für diesen Befund sowie daraus folgende klinische Implikationen und Vorschläge für weitere Forschung werden diskutiert. KW - Virtuelle Realität KW - Höhenangst KW - Expositionstherapie Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-207334 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schiele, Miriam A. A1 - Ziegler, Christiane A1 - Kollert, Leonie A1 - Katzorke, Andrea A1 - Schartner, Christoph A1 - Busch, Yasmin A1 - Gromer, Daniel A1 - Reif, Andreas A1 - Pauli, Paul A1 - Deckert, Jürgen A1 - Herrmann, Martin J. A1 - Domschke, Katharina T1 - Plasticity of Functional MAOA Gene Methylation in Acrophobia JF - International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology N2 - Epigenetic mechanisms have been proposed to mediate fear extinction in animal models. Here, MAOA methylation was analyzed via direct sequencing of sodium bisulfite-treated DNA extracted from blood cells before and after a 2-week exposure therapy in a sample of n = 28 female patients with acrophobia as well as in n = 28 matched healthy female controls. Clinical response was measured using the Acrophobia Questionnaire and the Attitude Towards Heights Questionnaire. The functional relevance of altered MAOA methylation was investigated by luciferase-based reporter gene assays. MAOA methylation was found to be significantly decreased in patients with acrophobia compared with healthy controls. Furthermore, MAOA methylation levels were shown to significantly increase after treatment and correlate with treatment response as reflected by decreasing Acrophobia Questionnaire/Attitude Towards Heights Questionnaire scores. Functional analyses revealed decreased reporter gene activity in presence of methylated compared with unmethylated pCpGfree_MAOA reporter gene vector constructs. The present proof-of-concept psychotherapy-epigenetic study for the first time suggests functional MAOA methylation changes as a potential epigenetic correlate of treatment response in acrophobia and fosters further investigation into the notion of epigenetic mechanisms underlying fear extinction. KW - monoamine oxidase A KW - anxiety KW - extinction KW - epigenetics KW - DNA methylation Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228571 VL - 21 IS - 9 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gromer, Daniel A1 - Madeira, Octávia A1 - Gast, Philipp A1 - Nehfischer, Markus A1 - Jost, Michael A1 - Müller, Mathias A1 - Mühlberger, Andreas A1 - Pauli, Paul T1 - Height Simulation in a Virtual Reality CAVE System: Validity of Fear Responses and Effects of an Immersion Manipulation JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience N2 - Acrophobia is characterized by intense fear in height situations. Virtual reality (VR) can be used to trigger such phobic fear, and VR exposure therapy (VRET) has proven effective for treatment of phobias, although it remains important to further elucidate factors that modulate and mediate the fear responses triggered in VR. The present study assessed verbal and behavioral fear responses triggered by a height simulation in a 5-sided cave automatic virtual environment (CAVE) with visual and acoustic simulation and further investigated how fear responses are modulated by immersion, i.e., an additional wind simulation, and presence, i.e., the feeling to be present in the VE. Results revealed a high validity for the CAVE and VE in provoking height related self-reported fear and avoidance behavior in accordance with a trait measure of acrophobic fear. Increasing immersion significantly increased fear responses in high height anxious (HHA) participants, but did not affect presence. Nevertheless, presence was found to be an important predictor of fear responses. We conclude that a CAVE system can be used to elicit valid fear responses, which might be further enhanced by immersion manipulations independent from presence. These results may help to improve VRET efficacy and its transfer to real situations. KW - anxiety KW - fear behavior KW - virtual reality KW - presence KW - immersion KW - acrophobia Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-196113 SN - 1662-5161 VL - 12 IS - 372 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kiser, Dominik P. A1 - Gromer, Daniel A1 - Pauli, Paul A1 - Hilger, Kirsten T1 - A virtual reality social conditioned place preference paradigm for humans: Does trait social anxiety affect approach and avoidance of virtual agents? JF - Frontiers in Virtual Reality N2 - Approach and avoidance of positive and negative social cues are fundamental to prevent isolation and ensure survival. High trait social anxiety is characterized by an avoidance of social situations and extensive avoidance is a risk factor for the development of social anxiety disorder (SAD). Therefore, experimental methods to assess social avoidance behavior in humans are essential. The social conditioned place preference (SCPP) paradigm is a well-established experimental paradigm in animal research that is used to objectively investigate social approach–avoidance mechanisms. We retranslated this paradigm for human research using virtual reality. To this end, 58 healthy adults were exposed to either a happy- or angry-looking virtual agent in a specific room, and the effects of this encounter on dwell time as well as evaluation of this room in a later test without an agent were examined. We did not observe a general SCPP effect on dwell time or ratings but discovered a moderation by trait social anxiety, in which participants with higher trait social anxiety spent less time in the room in which the angry agent was present before, suggesting that higher levels of trait social anxiety foster conditioned social avoidance. However, further studies are needed to verify this observation and substantiate an association with social anxiety disorder. We discussed the strengths, limitations, and technical implications of our paradigm for future investigations to more comprehensively understand the mechanisms involved in social anxiety and facilitate the development of new personalized treatment approaches by using virtual reality. KW - retranslational research KW - conditioned place preference KW - approach–avoidance KW - social anxiety KW - virtual reality KW - personality traits KW - individual differences Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-293564 SN - 2673-4192 VL - 3 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Madeira, Octavia A1 - Gromer, Daniel A1 - Latoschik, Marc Erich A1 - Pauli, Paul T1 - Effects of Acrophobic Fear and Trait Anxiety on Human Behavior in a Virtual Elevated Plus-Maze JF - Frontiers in Virtual Reality N2 - The Elevated Plus-Maze (EPM) is a well-established apparatus to measure anxiety in rodents, i.e., animals exhibiting an increased relative time spent in the closed vs. the open arms are considered anxious. To examine whether such anxiety-modulated behaviors are conserved in humans, we re-translated this paradigm to a human setting using virtual reality in a Cave Automatic Virtual Environment (CAVE) system. In two studies, we examined whether the EPM exploration behavior of humans is modulated by their trait anxiety and also assessed the individuals’ levels of acrophobia (fear of height), claustrophobia (fear of confined spaces), sensation seeking, and the reported anxiety when on the maze. First, we constructed an exact virtual copy of the animal EPM adjusted to human proportions. In analogy to animal EPM studies, participants (N = 30) freely explored the EPM for 5 min. In the second study (N = 61), we redesigned the EPM to make it more human-adapted and to differentiate influences of trait anxiety and acrophobia by introducing various floor textures and lower walls of closed arms to the height of standard handrails. In the first experiment, hierarchical regression analyses of exploration behavior revealed the expected association between open arm avoidance and Trait Anxiety, an even stronger association with acrophobic fear. In the second study, results revealed that acrophobia was associated with avoidance of open arms with mesh-floor texture, whereas for trait anxiety, claustrophobia, and sensation seeking, no effect was detected. Also, subjects’ fear rating was moderated by all psychometrics but trait anxiety. In sum, both studies consistently indicate that humans show no general open arm avoidance analogous to rodents and that human EPM behavior is modulated strongest by acrophobic fear, whereas trait anxiety plays a subordinate role. Thus, we conclude that the criteria for cross-species validity are met insufficiently in this case. Despite the exploratory nature, our studies provide in-depth insights into human exploration behavior on the virtual EPM. KW - elevated plus-maze KW - EPM KW - anxiety KW - virtual reality KW - translational neuroscience KW - acrophobia KW - trait anxiety Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-258709 VL - 2 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gromer, Daniel A1 - Kiser, Dominik P. A1 - Pauli, Paul T1 - Thigmotaxis in a virtual human open field test JF - Scientific Reports N2 - Animal models are used to study neurobiological mechanisms in mental disorders. Although there has been significant progress in the understanding of neurobiological underpinnings of threat-related behaviors and anxiety, little progress was made with regard to new or improved treatments for mental disorders. A possible reason for this lack of success is the unknown predictive and cross-species translational validity of animal models used in preclinical studies. Re-translational approaches, therefore, seek to establish cross-species translational validity by identifying behavioral operations shared across species. To this end, we implemented a human open field test in virtual reality and measured behavioral indices derived from animal studies in three experiments (N=31, N=30, and N=80). In addition, we investigated the associations between anxious traits and such behaviors. Results indicated a strong similarity in behavior across species, i.e., participants in our study-like rodents in animal studies-preferred to stay in the outer region of the open field, as indexed by multiple behavioral parameters. However, correlational analyses did not clearly indicate that these behaviors were a function of anxious traits of participants. We conclude that the realized virtual open field test is able to elicit thigmotaxis and thus demonstrates cross-species validity of this aspect of the test. Modulatory effects of anxiety on human open field behavior should be examined further by incorporating possible threats in the virtual scenario and/or by examining participants with higher anxiety levels or anxiety disorder patients. KW - anxiety KW - human behavior KW - anciety-like behavior KW - approach-avoidance conflict KW - elevated plus-maze KW - spatial navigation KW - mental disorders KW - fear KW - threat KW - circuits KW - reality KW - metaanalysis Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-259850 VL - 11 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Gromer, Daniel A1 - Reinke, Max A1 - Christner, Isabel A1 - Pauli, Paul T1 - Causal interactive links between presence and fear in virtual reality height exposure JF - Frontiers in Psychology N2 - Virtual reality plays an increasingly important role in research and therapy of pathological fear. However, the mechanisms how virtual environments elicit and modify fear responses are not yet fully understood. Presence, a psychological construct referring to the ‘sense of being there’ in a virtual environment, is widely assumed to crucially influence the strength of the elicited fear responses, however, causality is still under debate. The present study is the first that experimentally manipulated both variables to unravel the causal link between presence and fear responses. Height-fearful participants (N = 49) were immersed into a virtual height situation and a neutral control situation (fear manipulation) with either high versus low sensory realism (presence manipulation). Ratings of presence and verbal and physiological (skin conductance, heart rate) fear responses were recorded. Results revealed an effect of the fear manipulation on presence, i.e., higher presence ratings in the height situation compared to the neutral control situation, but no effect of the presence manipulation on fear responses. However, the presence ratings during the first exposure to the high quality neutral environment were predictive of later fear responses in the height situation. Our findings support the hypothesis that experiencing emotional responses in a virtual environment leads to a stronger feeling of being there, i.e., increase presence. In contrast, the effects of presence on fear seem to be more complex: on the one hand, increased presence due to the quality of the virtual environment did not influence fear; on the other hand, presence variability that likely stemmed from differences in user characteristics did predict later fear responses. These findings underscore the importance of user characteristics in the emergence of presence. KW - presence KW - fear KW - virtual reality KW - visual realism KW - acrophobia Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-201855 VL - 10 IS - 141 ER -