TY  - JOUR
A1  - Gratwohl, A
A1  - Pfirrmann, M
A1  - Zander, A
A1  - Kröger, N
A1  - Beelen, D
A1  - Novotny, J
A1  - Nerl, C
A1  - Scheid, C
A1  - Spiekermann, K
A1  - Mayer, J
A1  - Sayer, HG
A1  - Falge, C
A1  - Bunjes, D
A1  - Döhner, H
A1  - Ganser, A
A1  - Schmidt-Wolf, I
A1  - Schwerdtfeger, R
A1  - Baurmann, H
A1  - Kuse, R
A1  - Schmitz, N
A1  - Wehmeier, A
A1  - Fischer, J Th
A1  - Ho, AD
A1  - Wilhelm, M
A1  - Goebeler, M-E
A1  - Lindemann, HW
A1  - Bormann, M
A1  - Hertenstein, B
A1  - Schlimok, G
A1  - Baerlocher, GM
A1  - Aul, C
A1  - Pfreundschuh, M
A1  - Fabian, M
A1  - Staib, P
A1  - Edinger, M
A1  - Schatz, M
A1  - Fauser, A
A1  - Arnold, R
A1  - Kindler, T
A1  - Wulf, G
A1  - Rosselet, A
A1  - Hellmann, A
A1  - Schäfer, E
A1  - Prümmer, O
A1  - Schenk, M
A1  - Hasford, J
A1  - Heimpel, H
A1  - Hossfeld, DK
A1  - Kolb, H-J
A1  - Büsche, G
A1  - Haferlach, C
A1  - Schnittger, S
A1  - Müller, MC
A1  - Reiter, A
A1  - Berger, U
A1  - Saußele, S
A1  - Hochhaus, A
A1  - Hehlmann, R
T1  - Long-term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: a randomized comparison of stem cell transplantation with drug treatment
JF  - Leukemia
N2  - Tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent today's treatment of choice in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is regarded as salvage therapy. This prospective randomized CML-study IIIA recruited 669 patients with newly diagnosed CML between July 1997 and January 2004 from 143 centers. Of these, 427 patients were considered eligible for HSCT and were randomized by availability of a matched family donor between primary HSCT (group A; N=166 patients) and best available drug treatment (group B; N=261). Primary end point was long-term survival. Survival probabilities were not different between groups A and B (10-year survival: 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69–0.82) vs 0.69 (95% CI: 0.61–0.76)), but influenced by disease and transplant risk. Patients with a low transplant risk showed superior survival compared with patients with high- (P<0.001) and non-high-risk disease (P=0.047) in group B; after entering blast crisis, survival was not different with or without HSCT. Significantly more patients in group A were in molecular remission (56% vs 39%; P = 0.005) and free of drug treatment (56% vs 6%; P<0.001). Differences in symptoms and Karnofsky score were not significant. In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, HSCT remains a valid option when both disease and transplant risk are considered.
KW  - chronic myeloid leukemia
KW  - stem cell transplantation
KW  - drug treatment
KW  - CML
KW  - tyrosine kinase inhibitors
KW  - allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Y1  - 2016
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-150368
VL  - 30
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Stölzel, F.
A1  - Mohr, B.
A1  - Kramer, M.
A1  - Oelschlägel, U.
A1  - Bochtler, T.
A1  - Berdel, W. E.
A1  - Kaufmann, M.
A1  - Baldus, C. D.
A1  - Schäfer-Eckart, K.
A1  - Stuhlmann, R.
A1  - Einsele, H.
A1  - Krause, S. W.
A1  - Serve, H.
A1  - Hänel, M.
A1  - Herbst, R.
A1  - Neubauer, A.
A1  - Sohlbach, K.
A1  - Mayer, J.
A1  - Middeke, J. M.
A1  - Platzbecker, U.
A1  - Schaich, M.
A1  - Krämer, A.
A1  - Röllig, C.
A1  - Schetelig, J.
A1  - Bornhäuser, M.
A1  - Ehninger, G.
T1  - Karyotype complexity and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia
JF  - Blood Cancer Journal
N2  - A complex aberrant karyotype consisting of multiple unrelated cytogenetic abnormalities is associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The European Leukemia Net classification and the UK Medical Research Council recommendation provide prognostic categories that differ in the definition of unbalanced aberrations as well as the number of single aberrations. The aim of this study on 3526 AML patients was to redefine and validate a cutoff for karyotype complexity in AML with regard to adverse prognosis. Our study demonstrated that (1) patients with a pure hyperdiploid karyotype have an adverse risk irrespective of the number of chromosomal gains, (2) patients with translocation t(9;11)(p21∼22;q23) have an intermediate risk independent of the number of additional aberrations, (3) patients with 4 abnormalities have an adverse risk per se and (4) patients with three aberrations in the absence of abnormalities of strong influence (hyperdiploid karyotype, t(9;11)(p21∼22;q23), CBF-AML, unique adverse-risk aberrations) have borderline intermediate/adverse risk with a reduced overall survival compared with patients with a normal karyotype.
KW  - Cancer genetics
KW  - Genetics research
Y1  - 2016
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-164530
VL  - 6
ER  -