TY - JOUR A1 - De Palma, Adriana A1 - Abrahamczyk, Stefan A1 - Aizen, Marcelo A. A1 - Albrecht, Matthias A1 - Basset, Yves A1 - Bates, Adam A1 - Blake, Robin J. A1 - Boutin, Céline A1 - Bugter, Rob A1 - Connop, Stuart A1 - Cruz-López, Leopoldo A1 - Cunningham, Saul A. A1 - Darvill, Ben A1 - Diekötter, Tim A1 - Dorn, Silvia A1 - Downing, Nicola A1 - Entling, Martin H. A1 - Farwig, Nina A1 - Felicioli, Antonio A1 - Fonte, Steven J. A1 - Fowler, Robert A1 - Franzen, Markus Franzén A1 - Goulson, Dave A1 - Grass, Ingo A1 - Hanley, Mick E. A1 - Hendrix, Stephen D. A1 - Herrmann, Farina A1 - Herzog, Felix A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Jauker, Birgit A1 - Kessler, Michael A1 - Knight, M. E. A1 - Kruess, Andreas A1 - Lavelle, Patrick A1 - Le Féon, Violette A1 - Lentini, Pia A1 - Malone, Louise A. A1 - Marshall, Jon A1 - Martínez Pachón, Eliana A1 - McFrederick, Quinn S. A1 - Morales, Carolina L. A1 - Mudri-Stojnic, Sonja A1 - Nates-Parra, Guiomar A1 - Nilsson, Sven G. A1 - Öckinger, Erik A1 - Osgathorpe, Lynne A1 - Parra-H, Alejandro A1 - Peres, Carlos A. A1 - Persson, Anna S. A1 - Petanidou, Theodora A1 - Poveda, Katja A1 - Power, Eileen F. A1 - Quaranta, Marino A1 - Quintero, Carolina A1 - Rader, Romina A1 - Richards, Miriam H. A1 - Roulston, T’ai A1 - Rousseau, Laurent A1 - Sadler, Jonathan P. A1 - Samnegård, Ulrika A1 - Schellhorn, Nancy A. A1 - Schüepp, Christof A1 - Schweiger, Oliver A1 - Smith-Pardo, Allan H. A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf A1 - Stout, Jane C. A1 - Tonietto, Rebecca K. A1 - Tscharntke, Teja A1 - Tylianakis, Jason M. A1 - Verboven, Hans A. F. A1 - Vergara, Carlos H. A1 - Verhulst, Jort A1 - Westphal, Catrin A1 - Yoon, Hyung Joo A1 - Purvis, Andy T1 - Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes: Effects of geographic and taxonomic biases JF - Scientific Reports N2 - Land-use change and intensification threaten bee populations worldwide, imperilling pollination services. Global models are needed to better characterise, project, and mitigate bees' responses to these human impacts. The available data are, however, geographically and taxonomically unrepresentative; most data are from North America and Western Europe, overrepresenting bumblebees and raising concerns that model results may not be generalizable to other regions and taxa. To assess whether the geographic and taxonomic biases of data could undermine effectiveness of models for conservation policy, we have collated from the published literature a global dataset of bee diversity at sites facing land-use change and intensification, and assess whether bee responses to these pressures vary across 11 regions (Western, Northern, Eastern and Southern Europe; North, Central and South America; Australia and New Zealand; South East Asia; Middle and Southern Africa) and between bumblebees and other bees. Our analyses highlight strong regionally-based responses of total abundance, species richness and Simpson's diversity to land use, caused by variation in the sensitivity of species and potentially in the nature of threats. These results suggest that global extrapolation of models based on geographically and taxonomically restricted data may underestimate the true uncertainty, increasing the risk of ecological surprises. KW - bee community KW - land-use change KW - intensification KW - geographic biases KW - taxonomic biases KW - global dataset Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-167642 VL - 6 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Dormann, Carsten F. A1 - Tscharntke, Teja A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf T1 - Mass-flowering crops enhance wild bee abundance JF - Oecologia N2 - Although agricultural habitats can provide enormous amounts of food resources for pollinator species, links between agricultural and (semi-)natural habitats through dispersal and foraging movements have hardly been studied. In 67 study sites, we assessed the interactions between mass-flowering oilseed rape fields and semi-natural grasslands at different spatial scales, and their effects on the number of brood cells of a solitary cavity-nesting bee. The probability that the bee Osmia bicornis colonized trap nests in oilseed rape fields increased from 12 to 59 % when grassland was nearby, compared to fields isolated from grassland. In grasslands, the number of brood cells of O. bicornis in trap nests was 55 % higher when adjacent to oilseed rape compared to isolated grasslands. The percentage of oilseed rape pollen in the larval food was higher in oilseed rape fields and grasslands adjacent to oilseed rape than in isolated grasslands. In both oilseed rape fields and grasslands, the number of brood cells was positively correlated with the percentage of oilseed rape pollen in the larval food. We show that mass-flowering agricultural habitats—even when they are intensively managed—can strongly enhance the abundance of a solitary bee species nesting in nearby semi-natural habitats. Our results suggest that positive effects of agricultural habitats have been underestimated and might be very common (at least) for generalist species in landscapes consisting of a mixture of agricultural and semi-natural habitats. These effects might also have—so far overlooked—implications for interspecific competition and mutualistic interactions in semi-natural habitats. KW - spillover KW - trap nests KW - pollen KW - oilseed rape KW - canola Y1 - 2013 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-126852 VL - 172 IS - 2 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Dormann, Carsten F. A1 - Tscharntke, Teja A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf T1 - Mass-flowering crops enhance wild bee abundance JF - Oecologia N2 - Although agricultural habitats can provide enormous amounts of food resources for pollinator species, links between agricultural and (semi-)natural habitats through dispersal and foraging movements have hardly been studied. In 67 study sites, we assessed the interactions between mass-flowering oilseed rape fields and semi-natural grasslands at different spatial scales, and their effects on the number of brood cells of a solitary cavity-nesting bee. The probability that the bee Osmia bicornis colonized trap nests in oilseed rape fields increased from 12 to 59 % when grassland was nearby, compared to fields isolated from grassland. In grasslands, the number of brood cells of O. bicornis in trap nests was 55 % higher when adjacent to oilseed rape compared to isolated grasslands. The percentage of oilseed rape pollen in the larval food was higher in oilseed rape fields and grasslands adjacent to oilseed rape than in isolated grasslands. In both oilseed rape fields and grasslands, the number of brood cells was positively correlated with the percentage of oilseed rape pollen in the larval food. We show that mass-flowering agricultural habitats—even when they are intensively managed—can strongly enhance the abundance of a solitary bee species nesting in nearby semi-natural habitats. Our results suggest that positive effects of agricultural habitats have been underestimated and might be very common (at least) for generalist species in landscapes consisting of a mixture of agricultural and semi-natural habitats. These effects might also have—so far overlooked—implications for interspecific competition and mutualistic interactions in semi-natural habitats. KW - spillover KW - pollen KW - oilseed rape KW - canola KW - trap nests Y1 - 2013 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-132149 VL - 172 IS - 2 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Schlinkert, Hella A1 - Ludwig, Martin A1 - Batáry, Péter A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Kovács-Hostyánszki, Anikó A1 - Tscharntke, Teja A1 - Fischer, Christina T1 - Forest specialist and generalist small mammals in forest edges and hedges JF - Wildlife Biology N2 - Agricultural intensification often leads to fragmentation of natural habitats, such as forests, and thereby negatively affects forest specialist species. However, human introduced habitats, such as hedges, may counteract negative effects of forest fragmentation and increase dispersal, particularly of forest specialists. We studied effects of habitat type (forest edge versus hedge) and hedge isolation from forests (connected versus isolated hedge) in agricultural landscapes on abundance, species richness and community composition of mice, voles and shrews in forest edges and hedges. Simultaneously to these effects of forest edge/hedge type we analysed impacts of habitat structure, namely percentage of bare ground and forest edge/hedge width, on abundance, species richness and community composition of small mammals. Total abundance and forest specialist abundance (both driven by the most abundant species Myodes glareolus, bank vole) were higher in forest edges than in hedges, while hedge isolation had no effect. In contrast, abundance of habitat generalists was higher in isolated compared to connected hedges, with no effect of habitat type (forest edge versus hedge). Species richness as well as abundance of the most abundant habitat generalist Sorex araneus (common shrew), were not affected by habitat type or hedge isolation. Decreasing percentage of bare ground and increasing forest edge/hedge width was associated with increased abundance of forest specialists, while habitat structure was unrelated to species richness or abundance of any other group. Community composition was driven by forest specialists, which exceeded habitat generalist abundance in forest edges and connected hedges, while abundances were similar to each other in isolated hedges. Our results show that small mammal forest specialists prefer forest edges as habitats over hedges, while habitat generalists are able to use unoccupied ecological niches in isolated hedges. Consequently even isolated hedges can be marginal habitats for forest specialists and habitat generalists and thereby may increase regional farmland biodiversity. KW - forest specialists KW - forest fragmentation KW - forest hedges KW - forest edges Y1 - 2016 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-168333 VL - 22 IS - 3 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kleijn, David A1 - Winfree, Rachael A1 - Bartomeus, Ignasi A1 - Carvalheiro, Luísa G. A1 - Henry, Mickael A1 - Isaacs, Rufus A1 - Klein, Alexandra-Maria A1 - Kremen, Claire A1 - M'Gonigle, Leithen K. A1 - Rader, Romina A1 - Ricketts, Taylor H. A1 - Williams, Neal M. A1 - Adamson, Nancy Lee A1 - Ascher, John S. A1 - Báldi, András A1 - Batáry, Péter A1 - Benjamin, Faye A1 - Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. A1 - Blitzer, Eleanor J. A1 - Bommarco, Riccardo A1 - Brand, Mariette R. A1 - Bretagnolle, Vincent A1 - Button, Lindsey A1 - Cariveau, Daniel P. A1 - Chifflet, Rémy A1 - Colville, Jonathan F. A1 - Danforth, Bryan N. A1 - Elle, Elizabeth A1 - Garratt, Michael P. D. A1 - Herzog, Felix A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Howlett, Brad G. A1 - Jauker, Frank A1 - Jha, Shalene A1 - Knop, Eva A1 - Krewenka, Kristin M. A1 - Le Féon, Violette A1 - Mandelik, Yael A1 - May, Emily A. A1 - Park, Mia G. A1 - Pisanty, Gideon A1 - Reemer, Menno A1 - Riedinger, Verena A1 - Rollin, Orianne A1 - Rundlöf, Maj A1 - Sardiñas, Hillary S. A1 - Scheper, Jeroen A1 - Sciligo, Amber R. A1 - Smith, Henrik G. A1 - Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf A1 - Thorp, Robbin A1 - Tscharntke, Teja A1 - Verhulst, Jort A1 - Viana, Blandina F. A1 - Vaissière, Bernard E. A1 - Veldtman, Ruan A1 - Ward, Kimiora L. A1 - Westphal, Catrin A1 - Potts, Simon G. T1 - Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation JF - Nature Communications N2 - There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost- effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost- effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments. KW - ecosystem services KW - european countries KW - abundance KW - native bees KW - biodiversity conservation KW - plant diversity KW - fruit set KW - productivity KW - decline KW - pollen Y1 - 2015 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-151879 VL - 6 IS - 7414 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Klatt, Björn K. A1 - Holzschuh, Andrea A1 - Westphal, Catrin A1 - Clough, Yann A1 - Smit, Inga A1 - Pawelzik, Elke A1 - Tscharntke, Teja T1 - Bee pollination improves crop quality, shelf life and commercial value JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences N2 - Pollination improves the yield of most crop species and contributes to one-third of global crop production, but comprehensive benefits including crop quality are still unknown. Hence, pollination is underestimated by international policies, which is particularly alarming in times of agricultural intensification and diminishing pollination services. In this study, exclusion experiments with strawberries showed bee pollination to improve fruit quality, quantity and market value compared with wind and self-pollination. Bee-pollinated fruits were heavier, had less malformations and reached higher commercial grades. They had increased redness and reduced sugar–acid–ratios and were firmer, thus improving the commercially important shelf life. Longer shelf life reduced fruit loss by at least 11%. This is accounting for 0.32 billion US$ of the 1.44 billion US$ provided by bee pollination to the total value of 2.90 billion US$ made with strawberry selling in the European Union 2009. The fruit quality and yield effects are driven by the pollination-mediated production of hormonal growth regulators, which occur in several pollination-dependent crops. Thus, our comprehensive findings should be transferable to a wide range of crops and demonstrate bee pollination to be a hitherto underestimated but vital and economically important determinant of fruit quality. KW - commercial grades KW - ecosystem services KW - post-harvest quality KW - shelf life KW - strawberry KW - crop yield KW - ecology Y1 - 2014 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-120797 VL - 281 IS - 1775 ER -