TY - JOUR A1 - Rolfes, Muriel A1 - Borde, Julika A1 - Möllenhoff, Kathrin A1 - Kayali, Mohamad A1 - Ernst, Corinna A1 - Gehrig, Andrea A1 - Sutter, Christian A1 - Ramser, Juliane A1 - Niederacher, Dieter A1 - Horváth, Judit A1 - Arnold, Norbert A1 - Meindl, Alfons A1 - Auber, Bernd A1 - Rump, Andreas A1 - Wang-Gohrke, Shan A1 - Ritter, Julia A1 - Hentschel, Julia A1 - Thiele, Holger A1 - Altmüller, Janine A1 - Nürnberg, Peter A1 - Rhiem, Kerstin A1 - Engel, Christoph A1 - Wappenschmidt, Barbara A1 - Schmutzler, Rita K. A1 - Hahnen, Eric A1 - Hauke, Jan T1 - Prevalence of cancer predisposition germline variants in male breast cancer patients: results of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer JF - Cancers N2 - Male breast cancer (mBC) is associated with a high prevalence of pathogenic variants (PVs) in the BRCA2 gene; however, data regarding other BC predisposition genes are limited. In this retrospective multicenter study, we investigated the prevalence of PVs in BRCA1/2 and 23 non-BRCA1/2 genes using a sample of 614 patients with mBC, recruited through the centers of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. A high proportion of patients with mBC carried PVs in BRCA2 (23.0%, 142/614) and BRCA1 (4.6%, 28/614). The prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs was 11.0% in patients with mBC without a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Patients with BRCA1/2 PVs did not show an earlier disease onset than those without. The predominant clinical presentation of tumor phenotypes was estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, and HER2-negative (77.7%); further, 10.2% of the tumors were triple-positive, and 1.2% were triple-negative. No association was found between ER/PR/HER2 status and BRCA1/2 PV occurrence. Comparing the prevalence of protein-truncating variants (PTVs) between patients with mBC and control data (ExAC, n = 27,173) revealed significant associations of PTVs in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 with mBC (BRCA1: OR = 17.04, 95% CI = 10.54–26.82, p < 10\(^{−5}\); BRCA2: OR = 77.71, 95% CI = 58.71–102.33, p < 10\(^{−5}\)). A case-control investigation of 23 non-BRCA1/2 genes in 340 BRCA1/2-negative patients and ExAC controls revealed significant associations of PTVs in CHEK2, PALB2, and ATM with mBC (CHEK2: OR = 3.78, 95% CI = 1.59–7.71, p = 0.002; PALB2: OR = 14.77, 95% CI = 5.02–36.02, p < 10\(^{−5}\); ATM: OR = 3.36, 95% CI = 0.89–8.96, p = 0.04). Overall, our findings support the benefit of multi-gene panel testing in patients with mBC irrespective of their family history, age at disease onset, and tumor phenotype. KW - breast neoplasms KW - male breast cancer KW - breast cancer predisposition genes KW - genetic testing KW - familial breast cancer Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-281758 SN - 2072-6694 VL - 14 IS - 13 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Harter, Philipp A1 - Hauke, Jan A1 - Heitz, Florian A1 - Reuss, Alexander A1 - Kommoss, Stefan A1 - Marmé, Frederik A1 - Heimbach, André A1 - Prieske, Katharina A1 - Richters, Lisa A1 - Burges, Alexander A1 - Neidhardt, Guido A1 - de Gregorio, Nikolaus A1 - El-Balat, Ahmed A1 - Hilpert, Felix A1 - Meier, Werner A1 - Kimmig, Rainer A1 - Kast, Karin A1 - Sehouli, Jalid A1 - Baumann, Klaus A1 - Jackisch, Christian A1 - Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won A1 - Hanker, Lars A1 - Kröber, Sandra A1 - Pfisterer, Jacobus A1 - Gevensleben, Heidrun A1 - Schnelzer, Andreas A1 - Dietrich, Dimo A1 - Neunhöffer, Tanja A1 - Krockenberger, Mathias A1 - Brucker, Sara Y. A1 - Nürnberg, Peter A1 - Thiele, Holger A1 - Altmüller, Janine A1 - Lamla, Josefin A1 - Elser, Gabriele A1 - du Bois, Andreas A1 - Hahnen, Eric A1 - Schmutzler, Rita T1 - Prevalence of deleterious germline variants in risk genes including \(BRCA1/2\) in consecutive ovarian cancer patients (AGO-TR-1) JF - PLoS ONE N2 - Background Identification of families at risk for ovarian cancer offers the opportunity to consider prophylactic surgery thus reducing ovarian cancer mortality. So far, identification of potentially affected families in Germany was solely performed via family history and numbers of affected family members with breast or ovarian cancer. However, neither the prevalence of deleterious variants in \(BRCA1/2\) in ovarian cancer in Germany nor the reliability of family history as trigger for genetic counselling has ever been evaluated. Methods Prospective counseling and germline testing of consecutive patients with primary diagnosis or with platinum-sensitive relapse of an invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Testing included 25 candidate and established risk genes. Among these 25 genes, 16 genes (\(ATM\), \(BRCA1\), \(BRCA2\), \(CDH1\), \(CHEK2\), \(MLH1\), \(MSH2\), \(MSH6\), \(NBN\), \(PMS2\), \(PTEN\), \(PALB2\), \(RAD51C\), \(RAD51D\), \(STK11\), \(TP53\)) were defined as established cancer risk genes. A positive family history was defined as at least one relative with breast cancer or ovarian cancer or breast cancer in personal history. Results In total, we analyzed 523 patients: 281 patients with primary diagnosis of ovarian cancer and 242 patients with relapsed disease. Median age at primary diagnosis was 58 years (range 16–93) and 406 patients (77.6%) had a high-grade serous ovarian cancer. In total, 27.9% of the patients showed at least one deleterious variant in all 25 investigated genes and 26.4% in the defined 16 risk genes. Deleterious variants were most prevalent in the \(BRCA1\) (15.5%), \(BRCA2\) (5.5%), \(RAD51C\) (2.5%) and \(PALB2\) (1.1%) genes. The prevalence of deleterious variants did not differ significantly between patients at primary diagnosis and relapse. The prevalence of deleterious variants in \(BRCA1/2\) (and in all 16 risk genes) in patients <60 years was 30.2% (33.2%) versus 10.6% (18.9%) in patients \(\geq\)60 years. Family history was positive in 43% of all patients. Patients with a positive family history had a prevalence of deleterious variants of 31.6% (36.0%) versus 11.4% (17.6%) and histologic subtype of high grade serous ovarian cancer versus other showed a prevalence of deleterious variants of 23.2% (29.1%) and 10.2% (14.8%), respectively. Testing only for \(BRCA1/2\) would miss in our series more than 5% of the patients with a deleterious variant in established risk genes. Conclusions 26.4% of all patients harbor at least one deleterious variant in established risk genes. The threshold of 10% mutation rate which is accepted for reimbursement by health care providers in Germany was observed in all subgroups analyzed and neither age at primary diagnosis nor histo-type or family history sufficiently enough could identify a subgroup not eligible for genetic counselling and testing. Genetic testing should therefore be offered to every patient with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and limiting testing to \(BRCA1/2\) seems to be not sufficient. KW - medicine KW - Genetic causes of cancer KW - ovarian cancer KW - cancer risk factors KW - histology KW - cancer detection and diagnosis KW - breast cancer KW - genetic testing KW - human genetics Y1 - 2017 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-173553 VL - 12 IS - 10 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Dumont, Martine A1 - Weber-Lassalle, Nana A1 - Joly-Beauparlant, Charles A1 - Ernst, Corinna A1 - Droit, Arnaud A1 - Feng, Bing-Jian A1 - Dubois, Stéphane A1 - Collin-Deschesnes, Annie-Claude A1 - Soucy, Penny A1 - Vallée, Maxime A1 - Fournier, Frédéric A1 - Lemaçon, Audrey A1 - Adank, Muriel A. A1 - Allen, Jamie A1 - Altmüller, Janine A1 - Arnold, Norbert A1 - Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. A1 - Berutti, Riccardo A1 - Bolla, Manjeet K. A1 - Bull, Shelley A1 - Carvalho, Sara A1 - Cornelissen, Sten A1 - Dufault, Michael R. A1 - Dunning, Alison M. A1 - Engel, Christoph A1 - Gehrig, Andrea A1 - Geurts-Giele, Willemina R. R. A1 - Gieger, Christian A1 - Green, Jessica A1 - Hackmann, Karl A1 - Helmy, Mohamed A1 - Hentschel, Julia A1 - Hogervorst, Frans B. L. A1 - Hollestelle, Antoinette A1 - Hooning, Maartje J. A1 - Horváth, Judit A1 - Ikram, M. Arfan A1 - Kaulfuß, Silke A1 - Keeman, Renske A1 - Kuang, Da A1 - Luccarini, Craig A1 - Maier, Wolfgang A1 - Martens, John W. M. A1 - Niederacher, Dieter A1 - Nürnberg, Peter A1 - Ott, Claus-Eric A1 - Peters, Annette A1 - Pharoah, Paul D. P. A1 - Ramirez, Alfredo A1 - Ramser, Juliane A1 - Riedel-Heller, Steffi A1 - Schmidt, Gunnar A1 - Shah, Mitul A1 - Scherer, Martin A1 - Stäbler, Antje A1 - Strom, Tim M. A1 - Sutter, Christian A1 - Thiele, Holger A1 - van Asperen, Christi J. A1 - van der Kolk, Lizet A1 - van der Luijt, Rob B. A1 - Volk, Alexander E. A1 - Wagner, Michael A1 - Waisfisz, Quinten A1 - Wang, Qin A1 - Wang-Gohrke, Shan A1 - Weber, Bernhard H. F. A1 - Devilee, Peter A1 - Tavtigian, Sean A1 - Bader, Gary D. A1 - Meindl, Alfons A1 - Goldgar, David E. A1 - Andrulis, Irene L. A1 - Schmutzler, Rita K. A1 - Easton, Douglas F. A1 - Schmidt, Marjanka K. A1 - Hahnen, Eric A1 - Simard, Jacques T1 - Uncovering the contribution of moderate-penetrance susceptibility genes to breast cancer by whole-exome sequencing and targeted enrichment sequencing of candidate genes in women of European ancestry JF - Cancers N2 - Rare variants in at least 10 genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2, are associated with increased risk of breast cancer; however, these variants, in combination with common variants identified through genome-wide association studies, explain only a fraction of the familial aggregation of the disease. To identify further susceptibility genes, we performed a two-stage whole-exome sequencing study. In the discovery stage, samples from 1528 breast cancer cases enriched for breast cancer susceptibility and 3733 geographically matched unaffected controls were sequenced. Using five different filtering and gene prioritization strategies, 198 genes were selected for further validation. These genes, and a panel of 32 known or suspected breast cancer susceptibility genes, were assessed in a validation set of 6211 cases and 6019 controls for their association with risk of breast cancer overall, and by estrogen receptor (ER) disease subtypes, using gene burden tests applied to loss-of-function and rare missense variants. Twenty genes showed nominal evidence of association (p-value < 0.05) with either overall or subtype-specific breast cancer. Our study had the statistical power to detect susceptibility genes with effect sizes similar to ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2, however, it was underpowered to identify genes in which susceptibility variants are rarer or confer smaller effect sizes. Larger sample sizes would be required in order to identify such genes. KW - breast cancer KW - genetic susceptibility KW - whole-exome sequencing KW - moderate-penetrance genes Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-281768 SN - 2072-6694 VL - 14 IS - 14 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Weber-Lassalle, Nana A1 - Hauke, Jan A1 - Ramser, Juliane A1 - Richters, Lisa A1 - Groß, Eva A1 - Blümcke, Britta A1 - Gehrig, Andrea A1 - Kahlert, Anne-Karin A1 - Müller, Clemens R. A1 - Hackmann, Karl A1 - Honisch, Ellen A1 - Weber-Lassalle, Konstantin A1 - Niederacher, Dieter A1 - Borde, Julika A1 - Thiele, Holger A1 - Ernst, Corinna A1 - Altmüller, Janine A1 - Neidhardt, Guido A1 - Nürnberg, Peter A1 - Klaschik, Kristina A1 - Schroeder, Christopher A1 - Platzer, Konrad A1 - Volk, Alexander E. A1 - Wang-Gohrke, Shan A1 - Just, Walter A1 - Auber, Bernd A1 - Kubisch, Christian A1 - Schmidt, Gunnar A1 - Horvath, Judit A1 - Wappenschmidt, Barbara A1 - Engel, Christoph A1 - Arnold, Norbert A1 - Dworniczak, Bernd A1 - Rhiem, Kerstin A1 - Meindl, Alfons A1 - Schmutzler, Rita K. A1 - Hahnen, Eric T1 - BRIP1 loss-of-function mutations confer high risk for familial ovarian cancer, but not familial breast cancer JF - Breast Cancer Research N2 - Background Germline mutations in the BRIP1 gene have been described as conferring a moderate risk for ovarian cancer (OC), while the role of BRIP1 in breast cancer (BC) pathogenesis remains controversial. Methods To assess the role of deleterious BRIP1 germline mutations in BC/OC predisposition, 6341 well-characterized index patients with BC, 706 index patients with OC, and 2189 geographically matched female controls were screened for loss-of-function (LoF) mutations and potentially damaging missense variants. All index patients met the inclusion criteria of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer for germline testing and tested negative for pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants. Results BRIP1 LoF mutations confer a high OC risk in familial index patients (odds ratio (OR) = 20.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 12.02–36.57, P < 0.0001) and in the subgroup of index patients with late-onset OC (OR = 29.91, 95% CI = 14.99–59.66, P < 0.0001). No significant association of BRIP1 LoF mutations with familial BC was observed (OR = 1.81 95% CI = 1.00–3.30, P = 0.0623). In the subgroup of familial BC index patients without a family history of OC there was also no apparent association (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 0.70–2.90, P = 0.3030). In 1027 familial BC index patients with a family history of OC, the BRIP1 mutation prevalence was significantly higher than that observed in controls (OR = 3.59, 95% CI = 1.43–9.01; P = 0.0168). Based on the negative association between BRIP1 LoF mutations and familial BC in the absence of an OC family history, we conclude that the elevated mutation prevalence in the latter cohort was driven by the occurrence of OC in these families. Compared with controls, predicted damaging rare missense variants were significantly more prevalent in OC (P = 0.0014) but not in BC (P = 0.0693) patients. Conclusions To avoid ambiguous results, studies aimed at assessing the impact of candidate predisposition gene mutations on BC risk might differentiate between BC index patients with an OC family history and those without. In familial cases, we suggest that BRIP1 is a high-risk gene for late-onset OC but not a BC predisposition gene, though minor effects cannot be excluded. KW - breast cancer KW - ovarian cancer KW - BRIP1 gene KW - germline mutations Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-233433 VL - 20 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hollenhorst, Monika I. A1 - Jurastow, Innokentij A1 - Nandigama, Rajender A1 - Appenzeller, Silke A1 - Li, Lei A1 - Vogel, Jörg A1 - Wiederhold, Stephanie A1 - Althaus, Mike A1 - Empting, Martin A1 - Altmüller, Janine A1 - Hirsch, Anna K. H. A1 - Flockerzi, Veit A1 - Canning, Brendan J. A1 - Saliba, Antoine‐Emmanuel A1 - Krasteva‐Christ, Gabriela T1 - Tracheal brush cells release acetylcholine in response to bitter tastants for paracrine and autocrine signaling JF - The FASEB Journal N2 - For protection from inhaled pathogens many strategies have evolved in the airways such as mucociliary clearance and cough. We have previously shown that protective respiratory reflexes to locally released bacterial bitter “taste” substances are most probably initiated by tracheal brush cells (BC). Our single‐cell RNA‐seq analysis of murine BC revealed high expression levels of cholinergic and bitter taste signaling transcripts (Tas2r108, Gnat3, Trpm5). We directly demonstrate the secretion of acetylcholine (ACh) from BC upon stimulation with the Tas2R agonist denatonium. Inhibition of the taste transduction cascade abolished the increase in [Ca\(^{2+}\)]\(_{i}\) in BC and subsequent ACh‐release. ACh‐release is regulated in an autocrine manner. While the muscarinic ACh‐receptors M3R and M1R are activating, M2R is inhibitory. Paracrine effects of ACh released in response to denatonium included increased [Ca\(^{2+}\)]\(_{i}\) in ciliated cells. Stimulation by denatonium or with Pseudomonas quinolone signaling molecules led to an increase in mucociliary clearance in explanted tracheae that was Trpm5‐ and M3R‐mediated. We show that ACh‐release from BC via the bitter taste cascade leads to immediate paracrine protective responses that can be boosted in an autocrine manner. This mechanism represents the initial step for the activation of innate immune responses against pathogens in the airways. KW - acetylcholine KW - brush cells KW - mucociliary clearance KW - single‐cell RNA‐seq KW - taste Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-213516 VL - 34 IS - 1 SP - 316 EP - 332 ER -