TY  - THES
A1  - Leonhardt, Sara Diana
T1  - Resin collection and use in stingless bees
T1  - Wie stachellose Bienen Pflanzenharze sammeln und nutzen
N2  - Harz ist ein klebriges Pflanzenprodukt mit einem oft intensiven aromatischen Geruch. Es wird von Bäumen produziert, um Wunden zu verschließen und schädliche Besucher abzuwehren. Einige Insektenarten haben jedoch die erstaunliche Fähigkeit entwickelt, mit der klebrigen Substanz umzugehen und sie sich gar zu Nutzen zu machen. So verwenden Bienen Harz beispielsweise zum Nestbau und zur Verteidigung ihrer Kolonien. Während allgemein bekannt ist, dass Bienen Pollen und Nektar sammeln, wird der Tatsache, dass sie auch Harz sammlen, allerdings sehr viel weniger Beachtung geschenkt. Ziel meiner Dissertation war es daher, herauszufinden, warum, wie und wo stachellose Bienen in Borneo (sieben untersuchte Bienenarten), Australien (acht Arten) und Costa Rica (27 Arten) Pflanzenharze sammeln und verwerten. Diese Arbeit behandelt somit die enge Beziehung zwischen einer eusozialen Insektengattung und einem chemisch und physiologisch hoch komplexen Pflanzenprodukt, das Bienen nicht nur als Nestmaterial und zur Verteidigung dient, sondern auch eine wesentliche Bedeutung für deren chemische Diversität hat. Stachellose Bienen verhalten sich hochgradig opportunistisch, wenn sie Harz sammeln, d.h. verschiedene Bienenarten sammeln Harz von denselben Baumarten, wobei sie nahezu jede verfügbare Harzquelle nutzen. Dabei finden und erkennen sie Harzquellen anhand einiger charakteristischer Mono- und Sesquiterpene, nutzen jedoch nicht das gesamte Harz-Bouquet. Die Menge an eingetragenem Harz unterscheidet sich zwischen verschiedenen Bienenarten und kolonien und varriert mit verschiedenen Umweltbedingungen. Insbesondere eine Bedrohung durch Fressfeinde (z. B. Ameisen) führt zu einer massiven Steigerung des Harzeintrages; eine manuelle Zerstörung des Nesteinganges hat dagegen relativ wenig Einfluss. Das eingetragene Harz wird zum Nestbau und zur Verteidigung gegen Fressfeinde und Mikroben genutzt. Darüber hinaus dient es als Quelle für Terpene, die von den Bienen in ihre chemischen Oberflächenprofile eingebaut werden (kutikuläre Terpene). Dabei übertragen sie nur einen Bruchteil (8 %) der gewaltigen Menge (>> 1000) an Terpenen, die man im Harz von Bäumen findet, auf ihre Oberfläche. Die übertragenen Terpene bleiben in ihrer Struktur unverändert, allerdings unterscheiden sich die Bienenarten in der Zusammensetzung der Terpenprofile auf ihrer Oberfläche, obwohl alle untersuchten Arten Harz von denselben Bäumen sammeln. Die unterschiedlichen Terpenprofile sowie die Tatsache, dass nur wenige Terpene aus dem Harz aufgenommen werden, deuten auf einen artspezifischen und bisher unbekannten Filterungsmechanismus bei stachellosen Bienen hin. Auch übersteigt durch die Aufnahme von Terpenen die chemische Diversität der Oberflächenprofile von stachellosen Bienen die zahlreicher anderer Hymenopteren. Da Bienen die Terpene aus dem Harz nur „filtern“, sie dabei aber nicht verändern, sind sämtliche Bienenarten aus Borneo, Australien und Costa den charakteristischen Harzprofilen von Bäumen aus ihren Ursprungsgebieten chemisch sehr ähnlich. Da in jeder tropischen Region andere Baumarten vorkommen, varriert die chemische Zusammensetzung der vorkommenden Harze und damit der kutikulären Terpene von dort vorkommenden Bienen. Die meisten Bienenarten mit kutikulären Terpenen findet man in Borneo, wo nahezu 100 % der untersuchten Arten aus Baumharzen gewonnene Terpene in ihre chemischen Profilen einbauen. Im Gegensatz dazu sind es in Costa Rica nur 40 % der untersuchten Arten. Auch sammeln in Borneo gelegentlich 9 von 10 Arbeiterinnen einer Tetragonilla collina Kolonie Harz, wohingegen in Australien maximal 10 % und in Costa Rica maximal 40 % der Arbeiterinnen einer Kolonie Harz sammeln. Das Vorherrschen von Harz und aus Harz gewonnenen Terpenen in der chemischen Ökologie von Bienen auf Borneo spiegelt das Vorherrschen einer bestimmten südostasiatischen Baumfamilie wieder: der Dipterocarpaceen, deren Holz ungewöhnlich harzig ist. Ein solch enger Zusammenhang zwischen der Chemie von Bienen und der von Baumharzen verdeutlicht die enge Beziehung zwischen stachellosen Bienen und den Bäumen in ihrem Habitat. Die kutikulären Terpene schützen ihre Träger vor Angreifern (z.B. Ameisen) und Mikrobenbefall. Dabei variiert eine bestimmte Gruppe – Sesquiterpene – am meisten zwischen den Arten. Diese Terpengruppe manipuliert die natürlichweise auftretende zwischen-artliche Aggression, indem sie letztere bei jenen Arten verringert, die selbst keine Sesquiterpene in ihrem Profil haben. Aggressionsminderung durch chemische Komponenten, welche aus der Umwelt aufgenommen werden, stellt somit einen bisher unbekannten Mechanismus dar, um Toleranz zwischen sonst aggressiven Arten zu erreichen. Eine derarte Herabsetzung von aggressiven Verhalten bei stachellosen Bienen kann darüber hinaus ein entscheidender Faktor für das Entstehen sogenannter Nestaggregationen sein. Dabei nisten Kolonien von Bienenarten mit und Bienenarten ohne Sesquiterpene in ihrem chemischen Profil in unmittelbarer Nachbarschaft, ohne gegeneinander aggressiv zu sein. Im Hinblick auf die zahlreichen Funktionen, die Harze und/oder aus dem Harz gewonnene Substanzen für stachellose Bienen haben, stellt Harz zweifelsohne eine bedeutende Ressource in der Welt der Bienen dar – eine Ressource, die einen direkten Einfluss auf deren chemische Ökologie, Verteidigungsmechanismen und zwischen-artliche Kommunikation ausübt. Wie genau die Bienen ihre artspezifischen Terpenprofile erzeugen, insbesondere, wie es ihnen gelingt, dabei ganze Terpengruppen auszuschließen, muss in zukünftigen Studien genauer untersucht werden. Auch stellt sich die Frage, wie wichtig eine hohe Diversität an Harzquellen und damit Baumarten für die Bienen ist! Es ist durchaus möglich, dass neben einer Vielfalt an Blütenpflanzenarten auch der „Harzreichtum“ für das Wohlergehen der Bienen eine entscheidende Rolle spielt.
N2  - Resin, a sticky sap emitting terpenoids and other volatiles, is produced by various plant species to seal wounds and protect themselves against herbivores and microbes. Among several other insects, bees have evolved the surprising ability to handle the repellent plant sap and use it to construct and defend their nests. Whereas the collection of pollen and nectar has been intensively studied in bees, resin collection has received only little attention. The aim of this dissertation was to better understand how the physiological and chemical properties of resin and resin-derived compounds (terpenes) affect the ecology of stingless bees. I therefore asked why, where and how stingless bees of Borneo (seven study-species), Australia (eight) and Costa Rica (27) collect and process plant resins, addressing the importance of a largely neglected resource not only for building and defensive properties, but also for the bees’ chemical diversity. Stingless bees are highly opportunistic resin foragers with all species collecting resin from a similar set of tree species. They locate and/or recognize resin sources on the basis of several volatile mono- and sesquiterpenes. I found that different bee species and even colonies significantly varied in the amount of resin collected. Predator attack (e.g., by ants) had the strongest affect on resin intake, whereas manual nest destruction only slightly increased the number of resin foragers. Resin is used to build, maintain and defend nests, but also as source for chemical compounds (terpenes) which stingless bees include in their surface profiles (chemical profiles). They directly transfer resin-derived compounds to their body surfaces (cuticular terpenes), but only include a subset (8 %) of the large number (>> 1000) of terpenes found in tree resins. This phenomenon can only be explained by a hitherto unknown ability to filter environmentally derived compounds which results in species-specific terpene profiles and thus in an increased chemical heterogeneity among species. Moreover, due to the addition of resin-derived substances the diversity of compounds on the bees’ body surfaces by far exceeds the chemical diversity of profiles in other hymenopterans. Because stingless bees filter but do not modify resin-derived compounds, species from Borneo, Australia and Costa Rica all resemble the characteristic resin of typical trees in their regions of origin. This chemical similarity reveals a strong correlation between the diversity of tree resins and the diversity of cuticular terpenes among stingless bees in a given habitat. Because different tree species are found in different tropical regions, the chemical composition of tree resins varies between tropical regions as does the composition of cuticular terpenes in bee species from these regions. Cuticular terpenes are however most common among stingless from Borneo, with 100 % of species studied having resin-derived terpenes in their chemical profiles. They are least common in Costa Rica, with only 40 % of species having terpenes. Likewise, resin collection was found to be highest in Tetragonilla collina colonies of Borneo where occasionally up to 90 % of foragers collected resin. By contrast, resin collection was only performed by 10 % of foragers of a given colony in Australia and by a maximum of 40 % in Costa Rica. The dominance of resin and resin-derived compounds in the chemical ecology of bees from Borneo may mirror the dominance of a particular Southeast Asian tree family: the highly resinous dipterocarps. Such a correlation between the chemistry of bees and the chemistry of tree resins therefore underlines the close relationship between stingless bees and the trees of their habitat. Cuticular terpenes are assumed to protect bees against predators and/or microbes. Sesquiterpenes, a specific group of terpenes, most vary between species and impair inter-specific aggression by reducing aggressive behavior in species without sesquiterpenes, thereby providing a novel mechanism to achieve interspecific tolerance among insects. Reduced interspecific aggression may also be an important factor enabling the non-aggressive aggregation of nests from stingless bee colonies of up to four different species, because such aggregations frequently comprise both species with and species without sesquiterpenes. Given its various functions, resin represents a highly important resource for stingless bees which directly affects their chemical ecology, defensive properties and inter-specific communication. It remains to be investigated how the bees influence the resin-derived terpene profiles on their body surface and in their nests, particularly how they manage to exclude entire groups of terpenes. Whether bees actually need a high diversity of different resin sources and therefore tree species to maintain the homeostasis of their colonies or whether they would do equally well with a limited amount of resin sources available, should also be addressed in future studies. Answers to this question will directly impair bee and forest management in (sub)tropical regions.
KW  - stachellose Biene
KW  - Harze
KW  - Terpene
KW  - stachellose Bienen
KW  - stingless bees
KW  - resin
KW  - terpenes
Y1  - 2010
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-51588
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Leonhardt, Sara D.
A1  - Schmitt, Thomas
A1  - Blüthgen, Nico
T1  - Tree Resin Composition, Collection Behavior and Selective Filters Shape Chemical Profiles of Tropical Bees (Apidae: Meliponini)
N2  - The diversity of species is striking, but can be far exceeded by the chemical diversity of compounds collected, produced or used by them. Here, we relate the specificity of plant-consumer interactions to chemical diversity applying a comparative network analysis to both levels. Chemical diversity was explored for interactions between tropical stingless bees and plant resins, which bees collect for nest construction and to deter predators and microbes. Resins also function as an environmental source for terpenes that serve as appeasement allomones and protection against predators when accumulated on the bees’ body surfaces. To unravel the origin of the bees’ complex chemical profiles, we investigated resin collection and the processing of resin-derived terpenes. We therefore analyzed chemical networks of tree resins, foraging networks of resin collecting bees, and their acquired chemical networks. We revealed that 113 terpenes in nests of six bee species and 83 on their body surfaces comprised a subset of the 1,117 compounds found in resins from seven tree species. Sesquiterpenes were the most variable class of terpenes. Albeit widely present in tree resins, they were only found on the body surface of some species, but entirely lacking in others. Moreover, whereas the nest profile of Tetragonula melanocephala contained sesquiterpenes, its surface profile did not. Stingless bees showed a generalized collecting behavior among resin sources, and only a hitherto undescribed species-specific ‘‘filtering’’ of resin-derived terpenes can explain the variation in chemical profiles of nests and body surfaces fromdifferent species. The tight relationship between bees and tree resins of a large variety of species elucidates why the bees’ surfaces contain a much higher chemodiversity than other hymenopterans.
KW  - Stachellose Biene
Y1  - 2011
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-69035
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Leonhardt, Sara D.
A1  - Kaltenpoth, Martin
T1  - Microbial Communities of Three Sympatric Australian Stingless Bee Species
JF  - PLoS ONE
N2  - Bacterial symbionts of insects have received increasing attention due to their prominent role in nutrient acquisition and defense. In social bees, symbiotic bacteria can maintain colony homeostasis and fitness, and the loss or alteration of the bacterial community may be associated with the ongoing bee decline observed worldwide. However, analyses of microbiota associated with bees have been largely confined to the social honeybees (Apis mellifera) and bumblebees (Bombus spec.), revealing – among other taxa – host-specific lactic acid bacteria (LAB, genus Lactobacillus) that are not found in solitary bees. Here, we characterized the microbiota of three Australian stingless bee species (Apidae: Meliponini) of two phylogenetically distant genera (Tetragonula and Austroplebeia). Besides common plant bacteria, we find LAB in all three species, showing that LAB are shared by honeybees, bumblebees and stingless bees across geographical regions. However, while LAB of the honeybee-associated Firm4–5 clusters were present in Tetragonula, they were lacking in Austroplebeia. Instead, we found a novel clade of likely host-specific LAB in all three Australian stingless bee species which forms a sister clade to a large cluster of Halictidae-associated lactobacilli. Our findings indicate both a phylogenetic and geographical signal of host-specific LAB in stingless bees and highlight stingless bees as an interesting group to investigate the evolutionary history of the bee-LAB association.
KW  - bacteria
KW  - lactic acid bacteria
KW  - sequence alignment
KW  - insects
KW  - lactobacillus
KW  - sequence databases
KW  - honey bees
Y1  - 2014
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-119341
VL  - 9
IS  - 8
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Wallace, Helen Margaret
A1  - Leonhardt, Sara Diana
T1  - Do Hybrid Trees Inherit Invasive Characteristics? Fruits of Corymbia torelliana X C. citriodora Hybrids and Potential for Seed Dispersal by Bees
JF  - PLoS One
N2  - Tree invasions have substantial impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, and trees that are dispersed by animals are more likely to become invasive. In addition, hybridisation between plants is well documented as a source of new weeds, as hybrids gain new characteristics that allow them to become invasive. Corymbia torelliana is an invasive tree with an unusual animal dispersal mechanism: seed dispersal by stingless bees, that hybridizes readily with other species. We examined hybrids between C. torelliana and C. citriodora subsp. citriodora to determine whether hybrids have inherited the seed dispersal characteristics of C. torelliana that allow bee dispersal. Some hybrid fruits displayed the characteristic hollowness, resin production and resin chemistry associated with seed dispersal by bees. However, we did not observe bees foraging on any hybrid fruits until they had been damaged. We conclude that C. torelliana and C. citriodora subsp. citriodora hybrids can inherit some fruit characters that are associated with dispersal by bees, but we did not find a hybrid with the complete set of characters that would enable bee dispersal. However, around 20,000 hybrids have been planted in Australia, and ongoing monitoring is necessary to identify any hybrids that may become invasive.
KW  - resin
KW  - long-distance dispersal
KW  - Australian stingless bees
KW  - plantations
KW  - hymenoptera
KW  - populations
KW  - carbonaria
KW  - eucalyptus
KW  - cuticular profiles
KW  - hybridization
Y1  - 2015
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-141777
VL  - 10
IS  - 9
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Kaluza, Benjamin F.
A1  - Wallace, Helen
A1  - Heard, Tim A.
A1  - Klein, Aelxandra-Maria
A1  - Leonhardt, Sara D.
T1  - Urban gardens promote bee foraging over natural habitats and plantations
JF  - Ecology and Evolution
N2  - Increasing human land use for agriculture and housing leads to the loss of natural habitat and to widespread declines in wild bees. Bee foraging dynamics and fitness depend on the availability of resources in the surrounding landscape, but how precisely landscape related resource differences affect bee foraging patterns remains unclear. To investigate how landscape and its interaction with season and weather drive foraging and resource intake in social bees, we experimentally compared foraging activity, the allocation of foragers to different resources (pollen, nectar, and resin) and overall resource intake in the Australian stingless bee Tetragonula carbonaria (Apidae, Meliponini). Bee colonies were monitored in different seasons over two years. We compared foraging patterns and resource intake between the bees' natural habitat (forests) and two landscapes differently altered by humans (suburban gardens and agricultural macadamia plantations). We found foraging activity as well as pollen and nectar forager numbers to be highest in suburban gardens, intermediate in forests and low in plantations. Foraging patterns further differed between seasons, but seasonal variations strongly differed between landscapes. Sugar and pollen intake was low in plantations, but contrary with our predictions, it was even higher in gardens than in forests. In contrast, resin intake was similar across landscapes. Consequently, differences in resource availability between natural and altered landscapes strongly affect foraging patterns and thus resource intake in social bees. While agricultural monocultures largely reduce foraging success, suburban gardens can increase resource intake well above rates found in natural habitats of bees, indicating that human activities can both decrease and increase the availability of resources in a landscape and thus reduce or enhance bee fitness.
KW  - urbanization
KW  - anthropogenic activities
KW  - climate factors
KW  - meliponines
KW  - resource availability
Y1  - 2016
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-162713
VL  - 6
IS  - 5
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Kaluza, Benjamin F.
A1  - Wallace, Helen
A1  - Keller, Alexander
A1  - Heard, Tim A.
A1  - Jeffers, Bradley
A1  - Drescher, Nora
A1  - Blüthgen, Nico
A1  - Leonhardt, Sara D.
T1  - Generalist social bees maximize diversity intake in plant species-rich and resource-abundant environments
JF  - Ecosphere
N2  - Numerous studies revealed a positive relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, suggesting that biodiverse environments may not only enhance ecosystem processes, but also benefit individual ecosystem members by, for example, providing a higher diversity of resources. Whether and how the number of available resources affects resource collection and subsequently consumers (e.g., through impacting functions associated with resources) have, however, been little investigated, although a better understanding of this relationship may help explain why the abundance and richness of many animal species typically decline with decreasing plant (resource) diversity. Using a social bee species as model (Tetragonula carbonaria), we investigated how plant species richness—recorded for study sites located in different habitats—and associated resource abundance affected the diversity and functionality (here defined as nutritional content and antimicrobial activity) of resources (i.e., pollen, nectar, and resin) collected by a generalist herbivorous consumer. The diversity of both pollen and resin collected strongly increased with increasing plant/tree species richness, while resource abundance was only positively correlated with resin diversity. These findings suggest that bees maximize resource diversity intake in (resource) diverse habitats. Collecting more diverse resources did, however, not increase their functionality, which appeared to be primarily driven by the surrounding (plant) source community in our study. In generalist herbivores, maximizing resource diversity intake may therefore primarily secure collection of sufficient amounts of resources across the entire foraging season, but it also ensures that the allocated resources meet all functional needs. Decreasing available resource diversity may thus impact consumers primarily by reduced resource abundance, but also by reduced resource functionality, particularly when resources of high functionality (e.g., from specific plant species) become scarce.
KW  - functional complementarity
KW  - functional redundancy
KW  - Meliponini
KW  - nutritional ecology
KW  - plant–insect interactions
KW  - pollinator decline
Y1  - 2017
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-171155
VL  - 8
IS  - 3
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Drescher, Nora
A1  - Klein, Alexandra-Maria
A1  - Neumann, Peter
A1  - Yañez, Orlando
A1  - Leonhardt, Sara D.
T1  - Inside Honeybee Hives: Impact of Natural Propolis on the Ectoparasitic Mite Varroa destructor and Viruses
JF  - Insects
N2  - Social immunity is a key factor for honeybee health, including behavioral defense strategies such as the collective use of antimicrobial plant resins (propolis). While laboratory data repeatedly show significant propolis effects, field data are scarce, especially at the colony level. Here, we investigated whether propolis, as naturally deposited in the nests, can protect honeybees against ectoparasitic mites Varroa destructor and associated viruses, which are currently considered the most serious biological threat to European honeybee subspecies, Apis mellifera, globally. Propolis intake of 10 field colonies was manipulated by either reducing or adding freshly collected propolis. Mite infestations, titers of deformed wing virus (DWV) and sacbrood virus (SBV), resin intake, as well as colony strength were recorded monthly from July to September 2013. We additionally examined the effect of raw propolis volatiles on mite survival in laboratory assays. Our results showed no significant effects of adding or removing propolis on mite survival and infestation levels. However, in relation to V. destructor, DWV titers increased significantly less in colonies with added propolis than in propolis-removed colonies, whereas SBV titers were similar. Colonies with added propolis were also significantly stronger than propolis-removed colonies. These findings indicate that propolis may interfere with the dynamics of V. destructor-transmitted viruses, thereby further emphasizing the importance of propolis for honeybee health.
KW  - social immunity
KW  - Apis mellifera
KW  - deformed wing virus
KW  - plant-insect interactions
KW  - resin
KW  - sacbrood virus
Y1  - 2017
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-171164
VL  - 8
IS  - 1
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Kaluza, Benjamin F.
A1  - Wallace, Helen M.
A1  - Heard, Tim A.
A1  - Minden, Vanessa
A1  - Klein, Alexandra
A1  - Leonhardt, Sara D.
T1  - Social bees are fitter in more biodiverse environments
JF  - Scientific Reports
N2  - Bee population declines are often linked to human impacts, especially habitat and biodiversity loss, but empirical evidence is lacking. To clarify the link between biodiversity loss and bee decline, we examined how floral diversity affects (reproductive) fitness and population growth of a social stingless bee. For the first time, we related available resource diversity and abundance to resource (quality and quantity) intake and colony reproduction, over more than two years. Our results reveal plant diversity as key driver of bee fitness. Social bee colonies were fitter and their populations grew faster in more florally diverse environments due to a continuous supply of food resources. Colonies responded to high plant diversity with increased resource intake and colony food stores. Our findings thus point to biodiversity loss as main reason for the observed bee decline.
KW  - biodiversity
KW  - ecosystem services
KW  - social bees
KW  - fitness
Y1  - 2018
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177231
VL  - 8
IS  - 12353
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Ruedenauer, Fabian A.
A1  - Wöhrle, Christine
A1  - Spaethe, Johannes
A1  - Leonhardt, Sara D.
T1  - Do honeybees (Apis mellifera) differentiate between different pollen types?
JF  - PLoS ONE
N2  - Bees receive nectar and pollen as reward for pollinating plants. Pollen of different plant species varies widely in nutritional composition. In order to select pollen of appropriate nutritional quality, bees would benefit if they could distinguish different pollen types. Whether they rely on visual, olfactory and/or chemotactile cues to distinguish between different pollen types, has however been little studied. In this study, we examined whether and how Apis mellifera workers differentiate between almond and apple pollen. We used differential proboscis extension response conditioning with olfactory and chemotactile stimulation, in light and darkness, and in summer and winter bees. We found that honeybees were only able to differentiate between different pollen types, when they could use both chemotactile and olfactory cues. Visual cues further improved learning performance. Summer bees learned faster than winter bees. Our results thus highlight the importance of multisensory information for pollen discrimination.
KW  - pollen
KW  - bees
KW  - honey bees
KW  - conditioned response
KW  - behavioral conditioning
KW  - foraging
KW  - nutrients
KW  - sensory cues
Y1  - 2018
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177537
VL  - 13
IS  - 11
ER  - 
TY  - JOUR
A1  - Drescher, Nora
A1  - Klein, Alexandra-Maria
A1  - Schmitt, Thomas
A1  - Leonhardt, Sara Diana
T1  - A clue on bee glue: New insight into the sources and factors driving resin intake in honeybees (Apis mellifera)
JF  - PLoS ONE
N2  - Honeybees (Apis mellifera) are threatened by numerous pathogens and parasites. To prevent infections they apply cooperative behavioral defenses, such as allo-grooming and hygiene, or they use antimicrobial plant resin. Resin is a chemically complex and highly variable mixture of many bioactive compounds. Bees collect the sticky material from different plant species and use it for nest construction and protection. Despite its importance for colony health, comparatively little is known about the precise origins and variability in resin spectra collected by honeybees. To identify the botanical resin sources of A. mellifera in Western Europe we chemically compared resin loads of individual foragers and tree resins. We further examined the resin intake of 25 colonies from five different apiaries to assess the effect of location on variation in the spectra of collected resin. Across all colonies and apiaries, seven distinct resin types were categorized according to their color and chemical composition. Matches between bee-collected resin and tree resin indicated that bees used poplar (Populus balsamifera, P. x canadensis), birch (Betula alba), horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum) and coniferous trees (either Picea abies or Pinus sylvestris) as resin sources. Our data reveal that honeybees collect a comparatively broad and variable spectrum of resin sources, thus assuring protection against a variety of antagonists sensitive to different resins and/or compounds. We further unravel distinct preferences for specific resins and resin chemotypes, indicating that honeybees selectively search for bioactive resin compounds.
KW  - Honey bees
KW  - Poplars
KW  - Trees
KW  - Forests
KW  - Chemical composition
KW  - Bees
KW  - Conifers
KW  - Phenols
Y1  - 2019
U6  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-200935
VL  - 14
IS  - 2
ER  -