TY - JOUR A1 - Schuler, Michael A1 - Murauer, Kathrin A1 - Stangl, Stephanie A1 - Grau, Anna A1 - Gabriel, Katharina A1 - Podger, Lauren A1 - Heuschmann, Peter U. A1 - Faller, Hermann T1 - Pre-post changes in main outcomes of medical rehabilitation in Germany: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant and aggregated data JF - BMJ Open N2 - Introduction Multidisciplinary, complex rehabilitation interventions are an important part of the treatment of chronic diseases. However, little is known about the effectiveness of routine rehabilitation interventions within the German healthcare system. Due to the nature of the social insurance system in Germany, randomised controlled trials examining the effects of rehabilitation interventions are challenging to implement and scarcely accessible. Consequently, alternative pre-post designs can be employed to assess pre-post effects of medical rehabilitation programmes. We present a protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis methods to assess the pre-post effects of rehabilitation interventions in Germany. Methods and analysis The respective study will be conducted within the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A systematic literature review will be conducted to identify studies reporting the pre-post effects (start of intervention vs end of intervention or later) in German healthcare. Studies investigating the following disease groups will be included: orthopaedics, rheumatology, oncology, pulmonology, cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology and psychosomatics. The primary outcomes of interest are physical/mental quality of life, physical functioning and social participation for all disease groups as well as pain (orthopaedic and rheumatologic patients only), blood pressure (cardiac patients only), asthma control (patients with asthma only), dyspnoea (patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease only) and depression/anxiety (psychosomatic patients only). We will invite the principal investigators of the identified studies to provide additional individual patient data. We aim to perform the meta-analyses using individual patient data as well as aggregate data. We will examine the effects of both study-level and patient-level moderators by using a meta-regression method. Ethics and dissemination Only studies that have received institutional approval from an ethics committee and present anonymised individual patient data will be included in the meta-analysis. The results will be presented in a peer-reviewed publication and at research conferences. A declaration of no objection by the ethics committee of the University of Würzburg is available (number 20180411 01). KW - medical rehabilitation Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-201929 VL - 9 IS - 5 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Stangl, Stephanie A1 - Haas, Kirsten A1 - Eichner, Felizitas A. A1 - Grau, Anna A1 - Selig, Udo A1 - Ludwig, Timo A1 - Fehm, Tanja A1 - Stübner, Tanja A1 - Rashid, Asarnusch A1 - Kerscher, Alexander A1 - Bargou, Ralf A1 - Hermann, Silke A1 - Arndt, Volker A1 - Meyer, Martin A1 - Wildner, Manfred A1 - Faller, Hermann A1 - Schrauder, Michael G. A1 - Weigel, Michael A1 - Schlembach, Ulrich A1 - Heuschmann, Peter U. A1 - Wöckel, Achim T1 - Development and proof-of-concept of a multicenter, patient-centered cancer registry for breast cancer patients with metastatic disease — the “Breast cancer care for patients with metastatic disease” (BRE-4-MED) registry JF - Pilot and Feasibility Studies N2 - Background: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are treated with a palliative approach with focus oncontrolling for disease symptoms and maintaining high quality of life. Information on individual needs of patients andtheir relatives as well as on treatment patterns in clinical routine care for this specific patient group are lacking or arenot routinely documented in established Cancer Registries. Thus, we developed a registry concept specifically adaptedfor these incurable patients comprising primary and secondary data as well as mobile-health (m-health) data. Methods: The concept for patient-centered “Breast cancer care for patients with metastatic disease”(BRE-4-MED)registry was developed and piloted exemplarily in the region of Main-Franconia, a mainly rural region in Germanycomprising about 1.3 M inhabitants. The registry concept includes data on diagnosis, therapy, progression, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and needs of family members from several sources of information includingroutine data from established Cancer Registries in different federal states, treating physicians in hospital as well as inoutpatient settings, patients with metastatic breast cancer and their family members. Linkage with routine cancerregistry data was performed to collect secondary data on diagnosis, therapy, and progression. Paper and online-basedquestionnaires were used to assess PROMs. A dedicated mobile application software (APP) was developed to monitorneeds, progression, and therapy change of individual patients. Patient’s acceptance and feasibility of data collection inclinical routine was assessed within a proof-of-concept study. Results: The concept for the BRE-4-MED registry was developed and piloted between September 2017 and May 2018.In total n= 31 patients were included in the pilot study, n= 22 patients were followed up after 1 month. Recordlinkage with the Cancer Registries of Bavaria and Baden-Württemberg demonstrated to be feasible. The voluntary APP/online questionnaire was used by n= 7 participants. The feasibility of the registry concept in clinical routine waspositively evaluated by the participating hospitals. Conclusion: The concept of the BRE-4-MED registry provides evidence that combinatorial evaluation of PROMs, needsof family members, and raising clinical parameters from primary and secondary data sources as well as m-healthapplications are feasible and accepted in an incurable cancer collective. KW - Metastatic breast cancer KW - Patient-centered registry KW - Patient’s needs KW - m-Health KW - Health care service research Y1 - 2020 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-229149 VL - 6 ER - TY - THES A1 - Stangl, Stephanie T1 - Versorgung von Patientinnen und Patienten mit Brustkrebs in einer überwiegend ländlich geprägten Region T1 - Provision of breast cancer care in a mainly rural area N2 - Für die Diagnose und Therapie von Brustkrebs existiert die nationale evidenz- und konsensbasierte S3-Leitlinie. Die klinischen Krebsregister stellen sektor- und facharztübergreifende Diagnose- und Therapiedaten zur Qualitätssicherung bereit. Bislang fehlen jedoch Daten bezüglich patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Aufgrund des demographischen Wandels werden Brustkrebserkrankungen vor allem in ländlichen Regionen weiter zunehmen, weshalb Versorgungsstrukturen für alle Patientinnen erreichbar sein sollten. Es wurde ein patientenorientiertes Registerkonzept (Breast Cancer Care for patients with metastatic disease (BRE-4-MED)) für den metastasierten Brustkrebs entwickelt und hinsichtlich vordefinierter Machbarkeitskriterien pilotiert. An der BRE-4-MED-Pilotstudie nahmen 31 Patientinnen (96.8% weiblich) teil. Die bayernweite Erreichbarkeit zu brustkrebsspezifischen Versorgungsstrukturen wurde mithilfe einer Geographic Information System (GIS)-Analyse untersucht. Anhand von Leitlinienempfehlungen und Ergebnissen der BRE-4-MED-Pilotstudie wurden relevante Versorgungsstrukturen identifiziert. Die Ergebnisse der Pilotstudie zeigen, dass die Integration von Primär- und Sekundärdaten aus verschiedenen Quellen in ein zentrales Studienregister machbar ist und die erforderlichen organisatorischen Prozesse (z. B. data linkage mit Krebsregister) funktionieren. Die Ergebnisse der Erreichbarkeitsanalyse verdeutlichen, dass es keine bayernweite Erreichbarkeit zu brustkrebsspezifischen Versorgungsstrukturen gibt. Am stärksten war dieser Zusammenhang in grenznahen Regionen ausgeprägt. Die vorliegende Arbeit zeigt Chancen für eine patientenorientierte, qualitätsgesicherte Brustkrebsversorgung unabhängig vom Wohnort auf. N2 - For the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer evidence- and consensus-based recommendations are provided by the national S3-guideline. The comprehensive clinical cancer registries provide intersectoral and multispecialty data on diagnosis and therapy for quality assurance. However, information on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are still lacking. With demographic change, breast cancer will continue to increase, especially in rural areas. Therefore, care structures should be accessible to all patients. A patient-centered registry concept (Breast Cancer Care for patients with metastatic disease (BRE-4-MED)) has been developed for metastatic breast cancer. The concept was tested in a pilot study utilizing predefined feasibility criteria. Bavaria-wide accessibility to breast cancer-specific care structures was studied using a Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis. Guideline recommendations and results of the BRE-4-MED pilot study were used to identify relevant care structures. Thirty-one patients (96.8% female) from four certified breast centers of Mainfranken participated. The results of the pilot study show that the integration of primary and secondary data from different sources into a central database is feasible and the underlying organizational processes (e.g., data linkage with the cancer registry, central follow-up survey) worked out. The results of the accessibility analysis show that women from urban regions had a higher chance of reaching selected care structures than women from rural regions. This relationship was most pronounced for border-close areas. This thesis highlights opportunities for patient-centered and quality-assured breast cancer care regardless of patients’ residence. KW - Brustkrebs KW - Klinischer Behandlungspfad KW - Patientenorientierte Medizin KW - Ländlicher Raum KW - Qualitätssicherung KW - Versorgungsqualität KW - Leitlinien KW - Patienten-orientierte Versorgung Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-282474 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Stangl, Stephanie A1 - Rauch, Sebastian A1 - Rauh, Jürgen A1 - Meyer, Martin A1 - Müller‐Nordhorn, Jacqueline A1 - Wildner, Manfred A1 - Wöckel, Achim A1 - Heuschmann, Peter U. T1 - Disparities in Accessibility to Evidence-Based Breast Cancer Care Facilities by Rural and Urban Areas in Bavaria, Germany JF - Cancer N2 - Background Breast cancer (BC), which is most common in elderly women, requires a multidisciplinary and continuous approach to care. With demographic changes, the number of patients with chronic diseases such as BC will increase. This trend will especially hit rural areas, where the majority of the elderly live, in terms of comprehensive health care. Methods Accessibility to several cancer facilities in Bavaria, Germany, was analyzed with a geographic information system. Facilities were identified from the national BC guideline and from 31 participants in a proof‐of‐concept study from the Breast Cancer Care for Patients With Metastatic Disease registry. The timeframe for accessibility was defined as 30 or 60 minutes for all population points. The collection of address information was performed with different sources (eg, a physician registry). Routine data from the German Census 2011 and the population‐based Cancer Registry of Bavaria were linked at the district level. Results Females from urban areas (n = 2,938,991 [ie, total of females living in urban areas]) had a higher chance for predefined accessibility to the majority of analyzed facilities in comparison with females from rural areas (n = 3,385,813 [ie, total number of females living in rural areas]) with an odds ratio (OR) of 9.0 for cancer information counselling, an OR of 17.2 for a university hospital, and an OR of 7.2 for a psycho‐oncologist. For (inpatient) rehabilitation centers (OR, 0.2) and genetic counselling (OR, 0.3), women from urban areas had lower odds of accessibility within 30 or 60 minutes. Conclusions Disparities in accessibility between rural and urban areas exist in Bavaria. The identification of underserved areas can help to inform policymakers about disparities in comprehensive health care. Future strategies are needed to deliver high‐quality health care to all inhabitants, regardless of residence. KW - accessibility KW - breast cancer KW - evidence‐based medicine KW - geographic information science KW - health care service research Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-239854 VL - 127 IS - 13 SP - 2319 EP - 2332 ER -