TY - INPR A1 - Werner, Rudolf A. A1 - Bundschuh, Ralph A. A1 - Bundschuh, Lena A1 - Fanti, Stefano A1 - Javadi, Mehrbod S. A1 - Higuchi, Takahiro A1 - Weich, A. A1 - Pienta, Kenneth J. A1 - Buck, Andreas K. A1 - Pomper, Martin G. A1 - Gorin, Michael A. A1 - Herrmann, Ken A1 - Lapa, Constantin A1 - Rowe, Steven P. T1 - Novel Structured Reporting Systems for Theranostic Radiotracers T2 - Journal of Nuclear Medicine N2 - Standardized reporting is more and more routinely implemented in clinical practice and such structured reports have a major impact on a large variety of medical fields, e.g. laboratory medicine, pathology, and, recently, radiology. Notably, the field of nuclear medicine is constantly evolving, as novel radiotracers for numerous clinical applications are developed. Thus, framework systems for standardized reporting in this field may a) increase clinical acceptance of new radiotracers, b) allow for inter- and intra-center comparisons for quality assurance, and c) may be used in (global) multi-center studies to ensure comparable results and enable efficient data abstraction. In the last two years, several standardized framework systems for positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers with potential theranostic applications have been proposed. These include systems for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET agents for the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) and somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted PET agents for the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasias. In the present review, those standardized framework systems for PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET will be briefly introduced followed by an overview of their advantages and limitations. In addition, potential applications will be defined, approaches to validate such concepts will be proposed, and future perspectives will be discussed. KW - standardized reporting KW - Positronen-Emissions-Tomografie KW - prostate cancer KW - neuroendocrine neoplasia KW - 68Ga-DOTATATE KW - 68Ga-DOTATOC KW - 68Ga-DOTANOC KW - somatostatin receptor KW - SSTR KW - prostate-specific membrane antigen KW - PSMA KW - RADS KW - PSMA-RADS KW - SSTR-RADS KW - MI-RADS KW - PROMISE Y1 - 2019 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-174629 SN - 0161-5505 N1 - This research was originally published in JNM. Authors: Rudolf A. Werner, Ralph A. Bundschuh, Lena Bundschuh, Stefano Fanti, Mehrbod S. Javadi, Takahiro Higuchi, A. Weich, Kenneth J. Pienta, Andreas K. Buck, Martin G. Pomper, Michael A. Gorin, Ken Herrmann, Constantin Lapa, Steven P. Rowe. Novel Structured Reporting Systems for Theranostic Radiotracers. J Nucl Med May 1, 2019 vol. 60 no. 5 577-584 © SNMMI. ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Werner, Rudolf A. A1 - Bundschuh, Ralph A. A1 - Bundschuh, Lena A1 - Javadi, Mehrbod S. A1 - Higuchi, Takahiro A1 - Weich, Alexander A1 - Sheikhbahaei, Sara A1 - Pienta, Kenneth J. A1 - Buck, Andreas K. A1 - Pomper, Martin G. A1 - Gorin, Michael A. A1 - Lapa, Constantin A1 - Rowe, Steven P. T1 - MI-RADS: Molecular Imaging Reporting and Data Systems – A Generalizable Framework for Targeted Radiotracers with Theranostic Implications JF - Annals of Nuclear Medicine N2 - Both prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)- and somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agents for staging and restaging of prostate carcinoma or neuroendocrine tumors, respectively, are seeing rapidly expanding use. In addition to diagnostic applications, both classes of radiotracers can be used to triage patients for theranostic endoradiotherapy. While interpreting PSMA- or SSTR-targeted PET/computed tomography (CT) scans, the reader has to be aware of certain pitfalls. Adding to the complexity of the interpretation of those imaging agents, both normal biodistribution, and also false-positive and -negative findings differ between PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET radiotracers. Herein summarized under the umbrella term molecular imaging reporting and data systems (MI-RADS), two novel RADS classifications for PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET imaging are described (PSMA- and SSTR-RADS). Both framework systems may contribute to increase the level of a reader’s confidence and to navigate the imaging interpreter through indeterminate lesions, so that appropriate workup for equivocal findings can be pursued. Notably, PSMA- and SSTR-RADS are structured in a reciprocal fashion, i.e. if the reader is familiar with one system, the other system can readily be applied as well. In the present review we will discuss the most common pitfalls on PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET/CT, briefly introduce PSMA- and SSTR-RADS, and define a future role of the umbrella framework MI-RADS compared to other harmonization systems. KW - PET KW - Positronen-Emissions-Tomografie KW - prostate cancer KW - neuroendocrine tumor KW - prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) KW - somatostatin receptor (SSTR) KW - positron emission tomography KW - theranostics KW - standardization KW - RADS KW - reporting and data systems KW - personalized medicine Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-166995 SN - 0914-7187 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Fröhlich, Matthias A1 - Serfling, Sebastian A1 - Higuchi, Takahiro A1 - Pomper, Martin G. A1 - Rowe, Steven P. A1 - Schmalzing, Marc A1 - Tony, Hans-Peter A1 - Gernert, Michael A1 - Strunz, Patrick-Pascal A1 - Portegys, Jan A1 - Schwaneck, Eva-Christina A1 - Gadeholt, Ottar A1 - Weich, Alexander A1 - Buck, Andreas K. A1 - Bley, Thorsten A. A1 - Guggenberger, Konstanze V. A1 - Werner, Rudolf A. T1 - Whole-Body [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT Can Alter Diagnosis in Patients with Suspected Rheumatic Disease JF - Diagnostics N2 - The 2-deoxy-d-[\(^{18}\)F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is widely utilized to assess the vascular and articular inflammatory burden of patients with a suspected diagnosis of rheumatic disease. We aimed to elucidate the impact of [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT on change in initially suspected diagnosis in patients at the time of the scan. Thirty-four patients, who had undergone [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT, were enrolled and the initially suspected diagnosis prior to [18F]FDG PET/CT was compared to the final diagnosis. In addition, a semi-quantitative analysis including vessel wall-to-liver (VLR) and joint-to-liver (JLR) ratios was also conducted. Prior to [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT, 22/34 (64.7%) of patients did not have an established diagnosis, whereas in 7/34 (20.6%), polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) was suspected, and in 5/34 (14.7%), giant cell arteritis (GCA) was suspected by the referring rheumatologists. After [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT, the diagnosis was GCA in 19/34 (55.9%), combined GCA and PMR (GCA + PMR) in 9/34 (26.5%) and PMR in the remaining 6/34 (17.6%). As such, [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT altered suspected diagnosis in 28/34 (82.4%), including in all unclear cases. VLR of patients whose final diagnosis was GCA tended to be significantly higher when compared to VLR in PMR (GCA, 1.01 ± 0.08 (95%CI, 0.95–1.1) vs. PMR, 0.92 ± 0.1 (95%CI, 0.85–0.99), p = 0.07), but not when compared to PMR + GCA (1.04 ± 0.14 (95%CI, 0.95–1.13), p = 1). JLR of individuals finally diagnosed with PMR (0.94 ± 0.16, (95%CI, 0.83–1.06)), however, was significantly increased relative to JLR in GCA (0.58 ± 0.04 (95%CI, 0.55–0.61)) and GCA + PMR (0.64 ± 0.09 (95%CI, 0.57–0.71); p < 0.0001, respectively). In individuals with a suspected diagnosis of rheumatic disease, an inflammatory-directed [\(^{18}\)F]FDG PET/CT can alter diagnosis in the majority of the cases, particularly in subjects who were referred because of diagnostic uncertainty. Semi-quantitative assessment may be helpful in establishing a final diagnosis of PMR, supporting the notion that a quantitative whole-body read-out may be useful in unclear cases. KW - giant cell arteritis KW - GCA KW - [18F]FDG PET/CT KW - vasculature KW - inflammation KW - polymyalgia rheumatica KW - PMR KW - vasculitis Y1 - 2021 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-250227 SN - 2075-4418 VL - 11 IS - 11 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Serfling, Sebastian E. A1 - Lapa, Constantin A1 - Dreher, Niklas A1 - Hartrampf, Philipp E. A1 - Rowe, Steven P. A1 - Higuchi, Takahiro A1 - Schirbel, Andreas A1 - Weich, Alexander A1 - Hahner, Stefanie A1 - Fassnacht, Martin A1 - Buck, Andreas K. A1 - Werner, Rudolf A. T1 - Impact of tumor burden on normal organ distribution in patients imaged with CXCR4-targeted [\(^{68}\)Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT JF - Molecular Imaging and Biology N2 - Background CXCR4-directed positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been used as a diagnostic tool in patients with solid tumors. We aimed to determine a potential correlation between tumor burden and radiotracer accumulation in normal organs. Methods Ninety patients with histologically proven solid cancers underwent CXCR4-targeted [\(^{68}\)Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were placed in normal organs (heart, liver, spleen, bone marrow, and kidneys) and tumor lesions. Mean standardized uptake values (SUV\(_{mean}\)) for normal organs were determined. For CXCR4-positive tumor burden, maximum SUV (SUV\(_{max}\)), tumor volume (TV), and fractional tumor activity (FTA, defined as SUV\(_{mean}\) x TV), were calculated. We used a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ) to derive correlative indices between normal organ uptake and tumor burden. Results Median SUV\(_{mean}\) in unaffected organs was 5.2 for the spleen (range, 2.44 – 10.55), 3.27 for the kidneys (range, 1.52 – 17.4), followed by bone marrow (1.76, range, 0.84 – 3.98), heart (1.66, range, 0.88 – 2.89), and liver (1.28, range, 0.73 – 2.45). No significant correlation between SUV\(_{max}\) in tumor lesions (ρ ≤ 0.189, P ≥ 0.07), TV (ρ ≥ -0.204, P ≥ 0.06) or FTA (ρ ≥ -0.142, P ≥ 0.18) with the investigated organs was found. Conclusions In patients with solid tumors imaged with [\(^{68}\)Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT, no relevant tumor sink effect was noted. This observation may be of relevance for therapies with radioactive and non-radioactive CXCR4-directed drugs, as with increasing tumor burden, the dose to normal organs may remain unchanged. KW - CXCR4 KW - C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 KW - PET KW - [68Ga]PentixaFor KW - [177Lu]/[90Y]PentixaTher KW - theranostics KW - endoradiotherapy Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324622 VL - 24 IS - 4 ER -