• search hit 1 of 3
Back to Result List

Proton beam therapy for pediatric tumors of the central nervous system — experiences of clinical outcome and feasibility from the KiProReg study

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-297489
  • As radiotherapy is an important part of the treatment in a variety of pediatric tumors of the central nervous system (CNS), proton beam therapy (PBT) plays an evolving role due to its potential benefits attributable to the unique dose distribution, with the possibility to deliver high doses to the target volume while sparing surrounding tissue. Children receiving PBT for an intracranial tumor between August 2013 and October 2017 were enrolled in the prospective registry study KiProReg. Patient’s clinical data including treatment, outcome, andAs radiotherapy is an important part of the treatment in a variety of pediatric tumors of the central nervous system (CNS), proton beam therapy (PBT) plays an evolving role due to its potential benefits attributable to the unique dose distribution, with the possibility to deliver high doses to the target volume while sparing surrounding tissue. Children receiving PBT for an intracranial tumor between August 2013 and October 2017 were enrolled in the prospective registry study KiProReg. Patient’s clinical data including treatment, outcome, and follow-up were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan–Meier, and Cox regression analysis. Adverse events were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0 before, during, and after PBT. Written reports of follow-up imaging were screened for newly emerged evidence of imaging changes, according to a list of predefined keywords for the first 14 months after PBT. Two hundred and ninety-four patients were enrolled in this study. The 3-year overall survival of the whole cohort was 82.7%, 3-year progression-free survival was 67.3%, and 3-year local control was 79.5%. Seventeen patients developed grade 3 adverse events of the CNS during long-term follow-up (new adverse event n = 7; deterioration n = 10). Two patients developed vision loss (CTCAE 4°). This analysis demonstrates good general outcomes after PBT.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Sarah Peters, Sabine Frisch, Annika Stock, Julien Merta, Christian Bäumer, Christoph Blase, Eicke Schuermann, Stephan Tippelt, Brigitte Bison, Michael Frühwald, Stefan Rutkowski, Gudrun Fleischhack, Beate Timmermann
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-297489
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Medizinische Fakultät / Institut für diagnostische und interventionelle Neuroradiologie (ehem. Abteilung für Neuroradiologie)
Language:English
Parent Title (English):Cancers
ISSN:2072-6694
Year of Completion:2022
Volume:14
Issue:23
Article Number:5863
Source:Cancers (2022) 14:23, 5863. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235863
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235863
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Tag:adverse events; brain cancer; childhood cancer; imaging changes; proton beam therapy
Release Date:2023/11/07
Date of first Publication:2022/11/28
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International