• Treffer 2 von 4
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Guidelines and quality measures for the diagnosis of optic ataxia

Zitieren Sie bitte immer diese URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-122439
  • Since the first description of a systematic mis-reaching by Balint in 1909, a reasonable number of patients showing a similar phenomenology, later termed optic ataxia (OA), has been described. However, there is surprising inconsistency regarding the behavioral measures that are used to detect OA in experimental and clinical reports, if the respective measures are reported at all. A typical screening method that was presumably used by most researchers and clinicians, reaching for a target object in the peripheral visual space, has never beenSince the first description of a systematic mis-reaching by Balint in 1909, a reasonable number of patients showing a similar phenomenology, later termed optic ataxia (OA), has been described. However, there is surprising inconsistency regarding the behavioral measures that are used to detect OA in experimental and clinical reports, if the respective measures are reported at all. A typical screening method that was presumably used by most researchers and clinicians, reaching for a target object in the peripheral visual space, has never been evaluated. We developed a set of instructions and evaluation criteria for the scoring of a semi-standardized version of this reaching task. We tested 36 healthy participants, a group of 52 acute and chronic stroke patients, and 24 patients suffering from cerebellar ataxia. We found a high interrater reliability and a moderate test-retest reliability comparable to other clinical instruments in the stroke sample. The calculation of cut-off thresholds based on healthy control and cerebellar patient data showed an unexpected high number of false positives in these samples due to individual outliers that made a considerable number of errors in peripheral reaching. This study provides first empirical data from large control and patient groups for a screening procedure that seems to be widely used but rarely explicitly reported and prepares the grounds for its use as a standard tool for the description of patients who are included in single case or group studies addressing optic ataxia similar to the use of neglect, extinction, or apraxia screening tools.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Autor(en): Svenja Borchers, Laura Müller, Matthis Synofzik, Marc Himmelbach
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-122439
Dokumentart:Artikel / Aufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Institute der Universität:Medizinische Fakultät / Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:Englisch
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes / der Zeitschrift (Englisch):Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
ISSN:1662-5161
Erscheinungsjahr:2013
Band / Jahrgang:7
Heft / Ausgabe:324
Originalveröffentlichung / Quelle:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7:324.doi: 10.3389/ fnhum.2013.00324
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00324
Allgemeine fachliche Zuordnung (DDC-Klassifikation):6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Freie Schlagwort(e):Balints-Syndrome; beside test; cerebellar ataxia; cerebellar atrophy; cerebellum; damage; deficit; delay; hand; impairments; optic ataxia; parietal lobe; posterior cortical atrophy; reliability; systems; target
Datum der Freischaltung:25.02.2016
EU-Projektnummer / Contract (GA) number:211078
OpenAIRE:OpenAIRE
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung