• Treffer 8 von 11
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Concepts and outcomes of perioperative therapy in stage IA-III pancreatic cancer — a cross-validation of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers (GCRG/ADT)

Zitieren Sie bitte immer diese URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-262174
  • (1) Background: The aim of this study is to assess perioperative therapy in stage IA-III pancreatic cancer cross-validating the German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers — Network for Care, Quality, and Research in Oncology, Berlin (GCRG/ADT) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB). (2) Methods: Patients with clinical stage IA-III PDAC undergoing surgery alone (OP), neoadjuvant therapy (TX) + surgery (neo + OP), surgery+adjuvantTX (OP + adj) and neoadjuvantTX + surgery + adjuvantTX (neo + OP + adj) were identified.(1) Background: The aim of this study is to assess perioperative therapy in stage IA-III pancreatic cancer cross-validating the German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers — Network for Care, Quality, and Research in Oncology, Berlin (GCRG/ADT) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB). (2) Methods: Patients with clinical stage IA-III PDAC undergoing surgery alone (OP), neoadjuvant therapy (TX) + surgery (neo + OP), surgery+adjuvantTX (OP + adj) and neoadjuvantTX + surgery + adjuvantTX (neo + OP + adj) were identified. Baseline characteristics, histopathological parameters, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. (3) Results: 1392 patients from the GCRG/ADT and 29,081 patients from the NCDB were included. Patient selection and strategies of perioperative therapy remained consistent across the registries for stage IA-III pancreatic cancer. Combined neo + OP + adj was associated with prolonged OS as compared to neo + OP alone (17.8 m vs. 21.3 m, p = 0.012) across all stages in the GCRG/ADT registry. Similarly, OS with neo + OP + adj was improved as compared to neo + OP in the NCDB registry (26.4 m vs. 35.4 m, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: The cross-validation study demonstrated similar concepts and patient selection criteria of perioperative therapy across clinical stages of PDAC. Neoadjuvant therapy combined with adjuvant therapy is associated with improved overall survival as compared to either therapy alone.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Autor(en): Louisa Bolm, Sergii Zemskov, Maria Zeller, Taisuke Baba, Jorge Roldan, Jon M. Harrison, Natalie Petruch, Hiroki Sato, Ekaterina Petrova, Hryhoriy Lapshyn, Ruediger Braun, Kim C. Honselmann, Richard Hummel, Oleksii Dronov, Alexander V. Kirichenko, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, Kees Kleihues-van Tol, Sylke R. Zeissig, Dirk Rades, Tobias Keck, Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo, Ulrich F. Wellner, Rodney E. Wegner
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-262174
Dokumentart:Artikel / Aufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Institute der Universität:Medizinische Fakultät / Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:Englisch
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes / der Zeitschrift (Englisch):Cancers
ISSN:2072-6694
Erscheinungsjahr:2022
Band / Jahrgang:14
Heft / Ausgabe:4
Aufsatznummer:868
Originalveröffentlichung / Quelle:Cancers (2022) 14:4, 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14040868
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14040868
Allgemeine fachliche Zuordnung (DDC-Klassifikation):6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Freie Schlagwort(e):neoadjuvant therapy; pancreatic cancer; pancreatic surgery; perioperative therapy
Datum der Freischaltung:30.05.2023
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:09.02.2022
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International