The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 90 of 561
Back to Result List

It Takes Two–Skilled Recognition of Objects Engages Lateral Areas in Both Hemispheres

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-176935
  • Our object recognition abilities, a direct product of our experience with objects, are fine-tuned to perfection. Left temporal and lateral areas along the dorsal, action related stream, as well as left infero-temporal areas along the ventral, object related stream are engaged in object recognition. Here we show that expertise modulates the activity of dorsal areas in the recognition of man-made objects with clearly specified functions. Expert chess players were faster than chess novices in identifying chess objects and their functionalOur object recognition abilities, a direct product of our experience with objects, are fine-tuned to perfection. Left temporal and lateral areas along the dorsal, action related stream, as well as left infero-temporal areas along the ventral, object related stream are engaged in object recognition. Here we show that expertise modulates the activity of dorsal areas in the recognition of man-made objects with clearly specified functions. Expert chess players were faster than chess novices in identifying chess objects and their functional relations. Experts’ advantage was domain-specific as there were no differences between groups in a control task featuring geometrical shapes. The pattern of eye movements supported the notion that experts’ extensive knowledge about domain objects and their functions enabled superior recognition even when experts were not directly fixating the objects of interest. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) related exclusively the areas along the dorsal stream to chess specific object recognition. Besides the commonly involved left temporal and parietal lateral brain areas, we found that only in experts homologous areas on the right hemisphere were also engaged in chess specific object recognition. Based on these results, we discuss whether skilled object recognition does not only involve a more efficient version of the processes found in non-skilled recognition, but also qualitatively different cognitive processes which engage additional brain areasshow moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Merim Bilalic, Andrea Kiesel, Carsten Pohl, Michael Erb, Wolfgang Grodd
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-176935
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Fakultät für Humanwissenschaften (Philos., Psycho., Erziehungs- u. Gesell.-Wissensch.) / Institut für Psychologie
Language:English
Parent Title (German):PLoS ONE
Year of Completion:2011
Volume:6
Issue:1
Pagenumber:e16202
Source:PLoS ONE 6(1):e16202. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016202
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016202
Dewey Decimal Classification:1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie
Tag:Anterior inferotemporal cortex; Deliberate practice; Expert chess players; Function knowledge; Macaque monkey; Memory; Neural basis; Parietal cortex; Task; Temporal areas
Release Date:2019/02/20
Year of first Publication:2011
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung