The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 18 of 360
Back to Result List

Pedicled perforator flaps for mid-tibial soft tissue reconstruction in medically compromised patients

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-229473
  • Background: The soft tissue of the central pretibial area is difficult to reconstruct often requiring free tissue transfer. Especially medi- cally compromised patients are not ideal candidates for free tissue transfer and may benefit from expeditiously harvested local flaps with limited donor site morbidity. As muscle flaps are rare, pedi- cled flaps based on lateral perforators represent an alternative as the arc of rotation can often be limited to 90 °. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patient data was conducted to identifyBackground: The soft tissue of the central pretibial area is difficult to reconstruct often requiring free tissue transfer. Especially medi- cally compromised patients are not ideal candidates for free tissue transfer and may benefit from expeditiously harvested local flaps with limited donor site morbidity. As muscle flaps are rare, pedi- cled flaps based on lateral perforators represent an alternative as the arc of rotation can often be limited to 90 °. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patient data was conducted to identify patients over the age of 60 years with comor- bidities that underwent pretibial soft tissue reconstruction with a single-pedicle perforator flap. Patient demographics, size and cause of the defect, flap dimension, arc of rotation and complications were recorded. Results: Five patients with an average age of 71.4 years were in- cluded. The arc of rotation was 69 °, all flaps healed. There were two recurrences of osteomyelitis. Conclusion: Lateral perforators originating from the anterior tib- ial artery or peroneal artery are adequate source vessels for single pedicled perforator flaps even in medically compromised patients. A perforator located proximal to the defect allows limiting the arcof rotation to less than 90 °, which increases the safety of the flap. Patients benefit from a simple procedure without a microvascular anastomosis and a donor site confined to one extremityshow moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Rafael G. Jakubietz, Karsten Schmidt, Boris M. Holzapfel, Rainer H. Meffert, Michael G. Jakubietz
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-229473
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie
Medizinische Fakultät / Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand-, Plastische und Wiederherstellungschirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik II)
Language:English
Parent Title (English):JPRAS Open
Year of Completion:2020
Volume:24
Pagenumber:47-55
Source:JPRAS Open 24 (2020) 47–55. DOI:10.1016/j.jpra.2020.02.002
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2020.02.002
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Tag:Elderly patients; Lower extremity reconstruction; Pedicled perforator flap; Propeller flap
Release Date:2021/04/16
Collections:Open-Access-Publikationsfonds / Förderzeitraum 2020
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY-NC-ND: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung, Nicht kommerziell, Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International