• Treffer 1 von 1
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world's largest companies

Zitieren Sie bitte immer diese URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-191141
  • As a response to the growing public awareness on the importance of organisational contributions to sustainable development, there is an increased incentive for corporations to report on their sustainability activities. In parallel with this has been the development of Sustainable HRM' which embraces a growing body of practitioner and academic literature connecting the notions of corporate sustainability to HRM. The aim of this article is to analyse corporate sustainability reporting amongst the world's largest companies and to assess the HRMAs a response to the growing public awareness on the importance of organisational contributions to sustainable development, there is an increased incentive for corporations to report on their sustainability activities. In parallel with this has been the development of Sustainable HRM' which embraces a growing body of practitioner and academic literature connecting the notions of corporate sustainability to HRM. The aim of this article is to analyse corporate sustainability reporting amongst the world's largest companies and to assess the HRM aspects of sustainability within these reports in comparison to environmental aspects of sustainable management and whether organisational attributes - principally country-of-origin - influences the reporting of such practices. A focus in this article is the extent to which the reporting of various aspects of sustainability may reflect dominant models of corporate governance in the country in which a company is headquartered. The findings suggest, first and against expectations, that the overall disclosure on HRM-related performance is not lower than that on environmental performance. Second, companies report more on their internal workforce compared to their external workforce. Finally, international differences, in particular those between companies headquartered in liberal market economies and coordinated market economies, are not as apparent as expected.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Autor(en): Ina Ehnert, Sepideh Parsa, Ian Roper, Marcus Wagner, Michael Muller-Camen
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-191141
Dokumentart:Artikel / Aufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Institute der Universität:Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät / Betriebswirtschaftliches Institut
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:Englisch
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes / der Zeitschrift (Englisch):International Journal of Human Resource Management
Erscheinungsjahr:2016
Band / Jahrgang:27
Heft / Ausgabe:1
Seitenangabe:88-108
Originalveröffentlichung / Quelle:International Journal of Human Resource Management (2016) 27:1, S. 88-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157
Allgemeine fachliche Zuordnung (DDC-Klassifikation):6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 65 Management, Öffentlichkeitsarbeit / 650 Management und unterstützende Tätigkeiten
Freie Schlagwort(e):Human Resource Management; Sustainable HRM; comparative HRM; global reporting initiative; sustainability reporting
Datum der Freischaltung:15.02.2021
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC BY-NC-ND: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung, Nicht kommerziell, Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International