• search hit 3 of 10
Back to Result List

Lower beta‐1,3‐D‐glucan testing cut‐offs increase sensitivity for non‐albicans Candida species bloodstream infections

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-276515
  • Purpose Fungal biomarkers support early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. In this study, we evaluated the impact of a recent update to the manufacturer‐recommended cut‐off for beta‐1,3‐D‐glucan (BDG) testing (Fujifilm Wako BDG assay) on sensitivity and specificity for the detection of candidemia. Additionally, we compared the performance with tests for Candida antigen (Ag by Serion ELISA antigen Candida, Virion\Serion) and anti‐mannan antibodies (Ab by Hemkit Candida IHA, Ravo Diagnostika). Methods Sera of 82 patients withPurpose Fungal biomarkers support early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. In this study, we evaluated the impact of a recent update to the manufacturer‐recommended cut‐off for beta‐1,3‐D‐glucan (BDG) testing (Fujifilm Wako BDG assay) on sensitivity and specificity for the detection of candidemia. Additionally, we compared the performance with tests for Candida antigen (Ag by Serion ELISA antigen Candida, Virion\Serion) and anti‐mannan antibodies (Ab by Hemkit Candida IHA, Ravo Diagnostika). Methods Sera of 82 patients with candidemia, which were sampled with a maximum distance of ±14 days from the date of sampling of the corresponding positive blood cultures, were retrospectively analysed for BDG, Ag and Ab. Results of BDG testing were compared with results from sera of 129 patients with candidemia from a different hospital. Results Sensitivity of BDG testing (47%) was higher than for Ag (17%) or Ab (20%). By combining Ag and Ab testing, sensitivity was raised to 32%. Lowering the cut‐off of BDG from 11 pg/ml to the newly recommended cut‐off of 7 pg/ml resulted in a significant increase in sensitivity (47% vs 58%, p = .01 and 63% vs 71% p < .01). At both centres, the increase was significant in NAC but not in C. albicans candidemia. No significant effects on specificity were observed. Conclusion BDG testing outperformed Ag and Ab testing and its combination. Lowering the BDG cut‐off had no significant impact on specificity. The increase in sensitivity can be mainly attributed to a gain in sensitivity for non‐albicans Candida species bloodstream infections.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Johannes Forster, Karl Dichtl, Johannes Wagener
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-276515
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Medizinische Fakultät / Institut für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie
Language:English
Parent Title (English):Mycoses
Year of Completion:2022
Volume:65
Issue:5
First Page:500
Last Page:507
Source:Mycoses 2022, 65(5):500-507. DOI: 10.1111/myc.13421
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.13421
Dewey Decimal Classification:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 57 Biowissenschaften; Biologie / 570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
Tag:BDG; antigen testing; beta‐d‐glucan; bloodstream infection; candidemia; mannan
Release Date:2023/07/03
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International