• search hit 34 of 1673
Back to Result List

Daratumumab Plus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone in Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Frailty Subgroup Analysis of ALCYONE

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-370456
  • Background In the phase 3 ALCYONE study, daratumumab plus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (D-VMP) versus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (VMP) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. We present a subgroup analysis of ALCYONE by patient frailty status. Patients and Methods Frailty assessment was performed retrospectively using age, Charlson comorbidity index, and baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statusBackground In the phase 3 ALCYONE study, daratumumab plus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (D-VMP) versus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (VMP) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. We present a subgroup analysis of ALCYONE by patient frailty status. Patients and Methods Frailty assessment was performed retrospectively using age, Charlson comorbidity index, and baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score. Patients were classified as fit (0), intermediate (1), or frail (≥2); a nonfrail category combined fit and intermediate patients. Results Among randomized patients (D-VMP, n = 350; VMP, n = 356), 391 (55.4%) were nonfrail (D-VMP, 187 [53.4%]; VMP, 204 [57.3%]) and 315 (44.6%) were frail (163 [46.6%]; 152 [42.7%]). After 40.1-months median follow-up, nonfrail patients had longer PFS and OS than frail patients, but benefits of D-VMP versus VMP were maintained across subgroups: PFS nonfrail (median, 45.7 vs. 19.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; P < .0001), frail (32.9 vs. 19.5 months; HR, 0.51; P < .0001); OS nonfrail (36-month rate, 83.6% vs. 74.5%), frail (71.4% vs. 59.0%). Improved greater than or equal to complete response and minimal residual disease (10−5)-negativity rates were observed for D-VMP versus VMP across subgroups. The 2 most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (nonfrail: 39.2% [D-VMP] and 42.4% [VMP]; frail: 41.3% and 34.4%) and thrombocytopenia (nonfrail: 32.8% and 36.9%; frail: 36.9% and 39.1%). Conclusion Our findings support the clinical benefit of D-VMP in transplant-ineligible NDMM patients enrolled in ALCYONE, regardless of frailty status.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Maria-Victoria Mateos, Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Michele Cavo, Kenshi Suzuki, Stefan Knop, Chantal Doyen, Paulo Lucio, Zsolt Nagy, Ludek Pour, Sebastian Grosicki, Andre Crepaldi, Anna Marina Liberati, Philip Campbell, Sung-Soo Yoon, Genadi Iosava, Tomoaki Fujisaki, Mamta Garg, Shinsuke Iida, Joan Bladé, Jon Ukropec, Huiling Pei, Rian Van Rampelbergh, Anupa Kudva, Ming Qi, Jesus San-Miguel
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-370456
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Medizinische Fakultät / Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II
Language:English
Parent Title (English):Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia
Year of Completion:2021
Volume:21
Pagenumber:785-798
Source:Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia (2021) 21:785-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2021.06.005
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2021.06.005
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Tag:CD38; clinical study; efficacy; frail; monoclonal antibody
Release Date:2024/09/18
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International