• search hit 11 of 1412
Back to Result List

Modeling water quality in the Anthropocene: directions for the next-generation aquatic ecosystem models

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-224173
  • “Everything changes and nothing stands still” (Heraclitus). Here we review three major improvements to freshwater aquatic ecosystem models — and ecological models in general — as water quality scenario analysis tools towards a sustainable future. To tackle the rapid and deeply connected dynamics characteristic of the Anthropocene, we argue for the inclusion of eco-evolutionary, novel ecosystem and social-ecological dynamics. These dynamics arise from adaptive responses in organisms and ecosystems to global environmental change and act at“Everything changes and nothing stands still” (Heraclitus). Here we review three major improvements to freshwater aquatic ecosystem models — and ecological models in general — as water quality scenario analysis tools towards a sustainable future. To tackle the rapid and deeply connected dynamics characteristic of the Anthropocene, we argue for the inclusion of eco-evolutionary, novel ecosystem and social-ecological dynamics. These dynamics arise from adaptive responses in organisms and ecosystems to global environmental change and act at different integration levels and different time scales. We provide reasons and means to incorporate each improvement into aquatic ecosystem models. Throughout this study we refer to Lake Victoria as a microcosm of the evolving novel social-ecological systems of the Anthropocene. The Lake Victoria case clearly shows how interlinked eco-evolutionary, novel ecosystem and social-ecological dynamics are, and demonstrates the need for transdisciplinary research approaches towards global sustainability.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Wolf M Mooij, Dianneke van Wijk, Arthur HW Beusen, Robert J Brederveld, Manqi Chang, Marleen MP Cobben, Don L DeAngelis, Andrea S Downing, Pamela Green, Alena S Gsell, Inese Huttunen, Jan H Janse, Annette BG Janssen, Geerten M Hengeveld, Xiangzhen Kong, Lilith Kramer, Jan J Kuiper, Simon J Langan, Bart A Nolet, Rascha JM Nuijten, Maryna Strokal, Tineke A Troost, Anne A van Dam, Sven Teurlincx
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-224173
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Fakultät für Biologie / Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften
Language:English
Parent Title (English):Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Year of Completion:2019
Volume:36
Pagenumber:85-95
Source:Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (2019) 36:85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.012
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.012
Dewey Decimal Classification:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 57 Biowissenschaften; Biologie / 570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
Release Date:2024/08/08
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International