• Treffer 1 von 1
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Are native and non‐native pollinator friendly plants equally valuable for native wild bee communities?

Zitieren Sie bitte immer diese URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-218439
  • Bees rely on floral pollen and nectar for food. Therefore, pollinator friendly plantings are often used to enrich habitats in bee conservation efforts. As part of these plantings, non‐native plants may provide valuable floral resources, but their effects on native bee communities have not been assessed in direct comparison with native pollinator friendly plantings. In this study, we performed a common garden experiment by seeding mixes of 20 native and 20 non‐native pollinator friendly plant species at separate neighboring plots at three sitesBees rely on floral pollen and nectar for food. Therefore, pollinator friendly plantings are often used to enrich habitats in bee conservation efforts. As part of these plantings, non‐native plants may provide valuable floral resources, but their effects on native bee communities have not been assessed in direct comparison with native pollinator friendly plantings. In this study, we performed a common garden experiment by seeding mixes of 20 native and 20 non‐native pollinator friendly plant species at separate neighboring plots at three sites in Maryland, USA, and recorded flower visitors for 2 years. A total of 3,744 bees (120 species) were collected. Bee abundance and species richness were either similar across plant types (midseason and for abundance also late season) or lower at native than at non‐native plots (early season and for richness also late season). The overall bee community composition differed significantly between native and non‐native plots, with 11 and 23 bee species being found exclusively at one plot type or the other, respectively. Additionally, some species were more abundant at native plant plots, while others were more abundant at non‐natives. Native plants hosted more specialized plant–bee visitation networks than non‐native plants. Three species out of the five most abundant bee species were more specialized when foraging on native plants than on non‐native plants. Overall, visitation networks were more specialized in the early season than in late seasons. Our findings suggest that non‐native plants can benefit native pollinators, but may alter foraging patterns, bee community assemblage, and bee–plant network structures.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Autor(en): Nicola SeitzORCiD, Dennis vanEngelsdorp, Sara D. LeonhardtORCiD
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-218439
Dokumentart:Artikel / Aufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Institute der Universität:Fakultät für Biologie / Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:Englisch
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes / der Zeitschrift (Englisch):Ecology and Evolution
Erscheinungsjahr:2020
Band / Jahrgang:10
Heft / Ausgabe:23
Seitenangabe:12838-12850
Originalveröffentlichung / Quelle:Ecology and Evolution 2020; 10, 23: 12838– 12850. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6826
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6826
Allgemeine fachliche Zuordnung (DDC-Klassifikation):5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 57 Biowissenschaften; Biologie / 570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
Freie Schlagwort(e):bee conservation; common garden experiment; exotic plants; non‐native plants; plant–bee visitation networks; pollinator friendly plants; wild bees
Datum der Freischaltung:10.03.2021
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:03.12.2020
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds / Förderzeitraum 2020
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International