The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 3 of 158
Back to Result List

The microvascular peroneal artery perforator flap as a "lifeboat" for pedicled flaps

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-202233
  • Background: Pedicled perforator flaps have expanded reconstructive options in extremity reconstruction. Despite preoperative mapping, intraoperative findings may require microvascular tissue transfer when no adequate perforators can be found. The free peroneal artery perforator flap may serve as a reliable back-up plan in small defects. Methods: In 16 patients with small soft tissue defects on the upper and lower extremities, perforator-based propeller flaps were planned. The handheld Doppler device was used to localize potentialBackground: Pedicled perforator flaps have expanded reconstructive options in extremity reconstruction. Despite preoperative mapping, intraoperative findings may require microvascular tissue transfer when no adequate perforators can be found. The free peroneal artery perforator flap may serve as a reliable back-up plan in small defects. Methods: In 16 patients with small soft tissue defects on the upper and lower extremities, perforator-based propeller flaps were planned. The handheld Doppler device was used to localize potential perforators for a propeller flap in close proximity to the defect. Perforators of the proximal peroneal artery were also marked to allow conversion to microvascular tissue transfer. Results: In 6 cases, no adequate perforators were found intraoperatively. In 4 patients, the peroneal artery perforator flap was harvested and transferred. The pedicle length did not exceed 4 cm. No flap loss occurred. Conclusions: When no adequate perforator capable of nourishing a propeller flap can be found intraoperatively, the free peroneal artery flap is a good option to reconstruct small soft tissue defects in the distal extremities. The short vascular pedicle is less ideal in cases with a large zone of injury requiring a more distant site of anastomosis or when recipient vessels are located in deeper tissue planes.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Rafael G. Jakubietz, Danni F. Jakubietz, Raymund E. Horch, Joerg G. Gruenert, Rainer H. Meffert, Michael G. Jakubietz
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-202233
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Medizinische Fakultät / Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall-, Hand-, Plastische und Wiederherstellungschirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik II)
Language:English
Parent Title (English):Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery – Global Open
Year of Completion:2019
Volume:7
Issue:9
Pagenumber:e2396
Source:PLoS ONE (2019) 7:9, e2396. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002396
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002396
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 617 Chirurgie und verwandte medizinische Fachrichtungen
Tag:surgery
Release Date:2020/05/13
Collections:Open-Access-Publikationsfonds / Förderzeitraum 2019
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY-NC-ND: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung, Nicht kommerziell, Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International