• Treffer 55 von 202
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Effective or multilateral? The UN-EU partnership in military crisis management

Zitieren Sie bitte immer diese URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-65565
  • For the EU “effective multilateralism” in, with and within international organisations is the foundation of a system of global governance, so is laid down in the ESS. Therefore the term is used to label the EU’s activities in the UN-family and to characterise the relations with the UN in the wider context of global governance. It is the political argument for the EU’s commitment in military crisis management, side by side with UN peacekeepers. The UN in turn speaks of multilateralism to call for the EU’s loyalty and partnership. BothFor the EU “effective multilateralism” in, with and within international organisations is the foundation of a system of global governance, so is laid down in the ESS. Therefore the term is used to label the EU’s activities in the UN-family and to characterise the relations with the UN in the wider context of global governance. It is the political argument for the EU’s commitment in military crisis management, side by side with UN peacekeepers. The UN in turn speaks of multilateralism to call for the EU’s loyalty and partnership. Both organisations build their partnership on the common normative ground of multilateralism. The paper questions these rhetorical denominations critically. It goes beyond the political declarations to analyse the degree and quality of “effective multilateralism” in reality in and with international organisations, using the example of UN-EU-relations in military crisis management. The theoretical approach of multilateralism serves as the starting point of the analysis and theoretical basis of the paper (Chapter 1). The special EU-touch in “effective multilateralism” in comparison to the “UN-touch” is subject of Chapter 2. This analysis is necessary due to the meanwhile inflationary use of the term “effective multilateralism” in almost every CSFP context. Are the institutional steps to a partnership in crisis management as well as the operational collaboration in DR Congo (2003/2006/2009) and Chad/CAR (2008/2009) in line with “multilateralism”? is the question that is answered in the paper (Chapter 3).zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Autor(en): Manuela Scheuermann
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-65565
Dokumentart:Konferenzveröffentlichung
Institute der Universität:Fakultät für Humanwissenschaften (Philos., Psycho., Erziehungs- u. Gesell.-Wissensch.) / Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Soziologie
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:Englisch
Erscheinungsjahr:2011
Allgemeine fachliche Zuordnung (DDC-Klassifikation):3 Sozialwissenschaften / 32 Politikwissenschaft / 320 Politikwissenschaft
Normierte Schlagworte (GND):Friedenssicherung; Europäische Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik; Multilateralismus; Krisenmanagement
Freie Schlagwort(e):GSVP; UN-Friedenssicherung; inter-organisationale Beziehungen
CSDP; UN-peacekeeping; crisis management; inter-organisational relations; multilateralism
Datum der Freischaltung:21.10.2011
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoDeutsches Urheberrecht