• Treffer 9 von 22
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Complementarity among natural enemies enhances pest suppression

Zitieren Sie bitte immer diese URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158621
  • Natural enemies have been shown to be effective agents for controlling insect pests in crops. However, it remains unclear how different natural enemy guilds contribute to the regulation of pests and how this might be modulated by landscape context. In a field exclusion experiment in oilseed rape (OSR), we found that parasitoids and ground-dwelling predators acted in a complementary way to suppress pollen beetles, suggesting that pest control by multiple enemies attacking a pest during different periods of its occurrence in the field improvesNatural enemies have been shown to be effective agents for controlling insect pests in crops. However, it remains unclear how different natural enemy guilds contribute to the regulation of pests and how this might be modulated by landscape context. In a field exclusion experiment in oilseed rape (OSR), we found that parasitoids and ground-dwelling predators acted in a complementary way to suppress pollen beetles, suggesting that pest control by multiple enemies attacking a pest during different periods of its occurrence in the field improves biological control efficacy. The density of pollen beetle significantly decreased with an increased proportion of non-crop habitats in the landscape. Parasitism had a strong effect on pollen beetle numbers in landscapes with a low or intermediate proportion of non-crop habitats, but not in complex landscapes. Our results underline the importance of different natural enemy guilds to pest regulation in crops, and demonstrate how biological control can be strengthened by complementarity among natural enemies. The optimization of natural pest control by adoption of specific management practices at local and landscape scales, such as establishing non-crop areas, low-impact tillage, and temporal crop rotation, could significantly reduce dependence on pesticides and foster yield stability through ecological intensification in agriculture.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Autor(en): Matteo DaineseORCiD, Gudrun Schneider, Jochen Krauss, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158621
Dokumentart:Artikel / Aufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Institute der Universität:Fakultät für Biologie / Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:Englisch
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes / der Zeitschrift (Englisch):Scientific Reports
Erscheinungsjahr:2017
Band / Jahrgang:7
Seitenangabe:8172
Originalveröffentlichung / Quelle:Scientific Reports 7:8172 (2017). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08316-z
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08316-z
Allgemeine fachliche Zuordnung (DDC-Klassifikation):5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 57 Biowissenschaften; Biologie / 577 Ökologie
Freie Schlagwort(e):agroecology; ecosystem services
Datum der Freischaltung:23.03.2018
EU-Projektnummer / Contract (GA) number:311781
EU-Projektnummer / Contract (GA) number:226852
OpenAIRE:OpenAIRE
Sammlungen:Open-Access-Publikationsfonds / Förderzeitraum 2017
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International