• Treffer 1 von 6
Zurück zur Trefferliste

Artificial intelligence-based prediction of oroantral communication after tooth extraction utilizing preoperative panoramic radiography

Zitieren Sie bitte immer diese URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-278814
  • Oroantral communication (OAC) is a common complication after tooth extraction of upper molars. Profound preoperative panoramic radiography analysis might potentially help predict OAC following tooth extraction. In this exploratory study, we evaluated n = 300 consecutive cases (100 OAC and 200 controls) and trained five machine learning algorithms (VGG16, InceptionV3, MobileNetV2, EfficientNet, and ResNet50) to predict OAC versus non-OAC (binary classification task) from the input images. Further, four oral and maxillofacial experts evaluatedOroantral communication (OAC) is a common complication after tooth extraction of upper molars. Profound preoperative panoramic radiography analysis might potentially help predict OAC following tooth extraction. In this exploratory study, we evaluated n = 300 consecutive cases (100 OAC and 200 controls) and trained five machine learning algorithms (VGG16, InceptionV3, MobileNetV2, EfficientNet, and ResNet50) to predict OAC versus non-OAC (binary classification task) from the input images. Further, four oral and maxillofacial experts evaluated the respective panoramic radiography and determined performance metrics (accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), precision, recall, F1-score, and receiver operating characteristics curve) of all diagnostic approaches. Cohen's kappa was used to evaluate the agreement between expert evaluations. The deep learning algorithms reached high specificity (highest specificity 100% for InceptionV3) but low sensitivity (highest sensitivity 42.86% for MobileNetV2). The AUCs from VGG16, InceptionV3, MobileNetV2, EfficientNet, and ResNet50 were 0.53, 0.60, 0.67, 0.51, and 0.56, respectively. Expert 1–4 reached an AUC of 0.550, 0.629, 0.500, and 0.579, respectively. The specificity of the expert evaluations ranged from 51.74% to 95.02%, whereas sensitivity ranged from 14.14% to 59.60%. Cohen's kappa revealed a poor agreement for the oral and maxillofacial expert evaluations (Cohen's kappa: 0.1285). Overall, present data indicate that OAC cannot be sufficiently predicted from preoperative panoramic radiography. The false-negative rate, i.e., the rate of positive cases (OAC) missed by the deep learning algorithms, ranged from 57.14% to 95.24%. Surgeons should not solely rely on panoramic radiography when evaluating the probability of OAC occurrence. Clinical testing of OAC is warranted after each upper-molar tooth extraction.zeige mehrzeige weniger

Volltext Dateien herunterladen

Metadaten exportieren

Weitere Dienste

Teilen auf Twitter Suche bei Google Scholar Statistik - Anzahl der Zugriffe auf das Dokument
Metadaten
Autor(en): Andreas Vollmer, Babak Saravi, Michael Vollmer, Gernot Michael Lang, Anton Straub, Roman C. Brands, Alexander Kübler, Sebastian Gubik, Stefan Hartmann
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-278814
Dokumentart:Artikel / Aufsatz in einer Zeitschrift
Institute der Universität:Medizinische Fakultät / Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Plastische Gesichtschirurgie
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:Englisch
Titel des übergeordneten Werkes / der Zeitschrift (Englisch):Diagnostics
ISSN:2075-4418
Erscheinungsjahr:2022
Band / Jahrgang:12
Heft / Ausgabe:6
Aufsatznummer:1406
Originalveröffentlichung / Quelle:Diagnostics (2022) 12:6, 1406. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061406
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061406
Allgemeine fachliche Zuordnung (DDC-Klassifikation):6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Freie Schlagwort(e):X-ray; artificial intelligence; deep learning; operative planning; oroantral fistula; tooth extraction
Datum der Freischaltung:30.05.2023
Datum der Erstveröffentlichung:06.06.2022
Lizenz (Deutsch):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International