Implementation of robotic gynecological surgery in a German University Hospital: patient safety after 110 procedures

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-232650
  • Purpose Robotic surgery represents the latest development in the field of minimally invasive surgery and offers many technical advantages. Despite the higher costs, this novel approach has been applied increasingly in gynecological surgery. Regarding the implementation of a new operative method; however, the most important factor to be aware of is patient safety. In this study, we describe our experience in implementing robotic surgery in a German University Hospital focusing on patient safety after 110 procedures. Methods We performed aPurpose Robotic surgery represents the latest development in the field of minimally invasive surgery and offers many technical advantages. Despite the higher costs, this novel approach has been applied increasingly in gynecological surgery. Regarding the implementation of a new operative method; however, the most important factor to be aware of is patient safety. In this study, we describe our experience in implementing robotic surgery in a German University Hospital focusing on patient safety after 110 procedures. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 110 consecutive robotic procedures performed in the University Hospital of Würzburg between June 2017 and September 2019. During this time, 37 patients were treated for benign general gynecological conditions, 27 patients for gynecological malignancies, and 46 patients for urogynecological conditions. We evaluated patient safety through standardized assessment of intra- and postoperative complications, which were categorized according to the Clavien–Dindo classification. Results No complications were recorded in 90 (81.8%) operations. We observed Clavien–Dindo grade I complications in 8 (7.3%) cases, grade II complications in 5 (4.5%) cases, grade IIIa complications in 1 case (0.9%), and grade IIIb complications in 6 (5.5%) cases. No conversion to laparotomy or blood transfusion was needed. Conclusion Robotic surgery could be implemented for complex gynecological operations without relevant problems and was accompanied by low complication rates.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics
Metadaten
Author: Dimitrios Balafoutas, Achim Wöckel, Christine Wulff, Ralf Joukhadar
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-232650
Document Type:Journal article
Faculties:Medizinische Fakultät / Frauenklinik und Poliklinik
Language:English
Parent Title (English):Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
ISSN:0932-0067
Year of Completion:2020
Volume:302
Pagenumber:1381–1388
Source:Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 302, 1381–1388 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05751-8
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05751-8
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Tag:implementation; polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF); robotic complications; robotic hysterectomy; robotic sacrocolpopexy
Release Date:2021/06/30
Licence (German):License LogoCC BY: Creative-Commons-Lizenz: Namensnennung 4.0 International