Filtern
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (4)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- ja (4)
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (4) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- behaviour (4) (entfernen)
Institut
Sonstige beteiligte Institutionen
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most prevalent developmental disorders, affecting 5.9% children and adolescents and 2.5% adults worldwide. The core characteristics are age-inappropriate levels of hyperactivity, impulsivity and inattention, often accompanied by co-morbidities such as mood and conduct disorders as wells as learning deficits. In the majority of cases, ADHD is caused by an interplay of accumulated genetic and environmental risk factors. Twin studies report a very high heritability of 70–80%, however, common genetic variants in the population only explain a third of the heritability. The rest of the genetic predisposition is composed of rare copy number variations (CNVs) and gene x environment interactions including epigenetic alterations. Through genome wide association (GWAS) and linkage studies a number of likely candidate genes were identified. A handful of them play a role in dopamine or noradrenaline neurotransmitter systems, simultaneously those systems are the main targets of common drug treatment approaches. However, for the majority of candidates the biological function in relation to ADHD is unknown. It is crucial to identify those functions in order to gain a deeper understanding of the pathomechanism and genetic networks potentially responsible for the disorder. This work focuses on the three candidate genes GFOD1, SLC2A3 and LBX1 and their role in the healthy organism as well as in case of ADHD. The neuroanatomy was regarded through expression analysis and various behavioural assays of activity were performed to link alterations on the transcript level to phenotypes associated with the neurodevelopmental disorder. Zebrafish orthologues of the human risk genes were identified and extensive temporal and spacial expression characterisation performed via RNA in situ hybridisation. Through morpholino derived knock-down and mRNA overexpression zebrafish models with subsequent behavioural analysis, both hyper- and hypoactive phenotypes were discovered. Additional expression analysis through double in situ hybridisation revealed a co-localisation during zebrafish neurodevelopment of each gfod1 and slc2a3a together with gad1b, a marker for GABAergic neurons. Interestingly, both risk genes have previously been associated with glucose homeostasis and energy metabolism, which when disrupted could lead to alterations in signal transduction and neuron survival. Likewise, Lbx1 plays a pivotal role in GABAergic versus glutamatergic neuron specification during spinal cord and hindbrain development in mice and chicken. Preliminary results of this work suggest a similar role in zebrafish. Taken together, those findings on the one hand represent a sturdy basis to con- tinue studies of the function of the genes and on the other hand open up the opportunity to investigate novel aspects of ADHD research by exploring the role of the GABAergic neurotransmitter system or the connection between energy metabolism and psychiatric disorders.
The biogenic amines octopamine and tyramine are important neurotransmitters in insects and other protostomes. They play a pivotal role in the sensory responses, learning and memory and social organisation of honeybees. Generally, octopamine and tyramine are believed to fulfil similar roles as their deuterostome counterparts epinephrine and norepinephrine. In some cases opposing functions of both amines have been observed. In this study, we examined the functions of tyramine and octopamine in honeybee responses to light. As a first step, electroretinography was used to analyse the effect of both amines on sensory sensitivity at the photoreceptor level. Here, the maximum receptor response was increased by octopamine and decreased by tyramine. As a second step, phototaxis experiments were performed to quantify the behavioural responses to light following treatment with either amine. Octopamine increased the walking speed towards different light sources while tyramine decreased it. This was independent of locomotor activity. Our results indicate that tyramine and octopamine act as functional opposites in processing responses to light.
The work presented in this thesis covers the effects of early-life adversity in the context of altered serotonin (5-HT; 5-hydroxytryptamine) system functioning in mice. The main body is focussing on a screening approach identifying molecular processes, potentially involved in distinct behavioural manifestations that emerge from or are concomitant with early adversity and, with regard to some behavioural manifestations, dependent on the functioning of the 5-HT system.
In this thesis I studied psychological aspects in the behaviour of Drosophila, and especially Drosophila larvae. After an introduction where I present the general scientific context and describe the mechanisms of olfactory perception as well as of classical and operant conditioning, I present the different experiments that I realised during my PhD. Perception The second chapter deals with the way adult Drosophila generalise between single odours and binary mixtures of odours. I found that flies perceive a mixture of two odours as equally similar to the two elements composing it; and that the intensity as well as the physico-chemical nature of the elements composing a mixture affect the degree of generalisation between this mixture and one of its elements. These findings now call for further investigation on the physiological level, using functional imaging. Memory The third chapter presents a series of experiments in Drosophila larvae in order to define some characteristics of a new protocol for classical aversive learning which involves associating odours with mechanical disturbance as a punishment. The protocol and the first results should open new doors for the study of classical conditioning in Drosophila larvae, by allowing the comparison between two types of aversive memory (gustatory vs. mechanical reinforcement), including a comparison of their neurogenetic bases. It will also allow enquiries into the question whether these respective memories are specific for the kind of reinforcer used. Agency The fourth chapter documents our attempts to establish operant memory in Drosophila larvae. By analysing the first moments of the test, I could reveal that the larvae modified their behaviour according to their previous operant training. However, this memory seems to be quickly extinguished during the course of the test. We now aim at repeating these results and improving the protocol, in order to be able to systematically study the mechanisms allowing and underlying operant learning in Drosophila larvae. In the fifth chapter, I use the methods developed in chapter four for an analysis of larval locomotion. I determine whether larval locomotion in terms of speed or angular speed is affected by a treatment with the “cognitive enhancer” Rhodiola rosea, or by mutations in the Synapsin or SAP47 genes which are involved in the formation of olfactory memory. I also characterize the modifications induced by the presence of gustatory stimuli in the substrate on which the larvae are crawling. This thesis thus brings new elements to the current knowledge of Drosophila