Filtern
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (2)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- ja (2)
Dokumenttyp
- Dissertation (2)
Sprache
- Englisch (2) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Prädation (2) (entfernen)
Institut
- Theodor-Boveri-Institut für Biowissenschaften (2) (entfernen)
Chapter 1 – General introduction
Anthropogenic land-use and climate change are the major drivers of the global biodiversity loss. Yet, biodiversity is essential for human well-being, as we depend on the availability of potable water, sufficient food and further benefits obtained from nature. Each species makes a somewhat unique contribution to these ecosystem services. Furthermore, species tolerate environmental stressors, such as climate change, differently. Thus, biodiversity is both the "engine" and the "insurance" for human well-being in a changing climate. Here, I investigate the effects of temperature and land use on herbivory (Chapter 2), predation (Chapter 3) and pest control (Chapter 4), and at the same time identify features of habitats (e.g. plant richness, proximity to different habitat types) and landscapes (e.g. landscape diversity, proportion of oilseed rape area) as potential management targets in an adaptation strategy to climate change. Finally, I discuss the similarities and differences between factors influencing herbivory, predation and pest control, while placing the observations in the context of climate change as a multifaceted phenomenon, and highlighting starting points for sustainable insect pest management (Chapter 5).
Chapter 2 – Plant richness, land use and temperature differently shape invertebrate leaf-chewing herbivory on major plant functional groups
Invertebrate herbivores are temperature-sensitive. Rising temperatures increase their metabolic rates and thus their demand for carbon-rich relative to protein-rich resources, which can lead to changes in the diets of generalist herbivores. Here, we quantified leaf-area loss to chewing invertebrates among three plant functional groups (legumes, non-leguminous forbs and grasses), which largely differ in C:N (carbon:nitrogen) ratio. This reseach was conducted along spatial temperature and land-use gradients in open herbaceous vegetation adjacent to different habitat types (forest, grassland, arable field, settlement). Herbivory largely differed among plant functional groups and was higher on legumes than forbs and grasses, except in open areas in forests. There, herbivory was similar among plant functional groups and on legumes lower than in grasslands. Also the presence of many plant families lowered herbivory on legumes. This suggests that open areas in forests and diverse vegetation provide certain protection against leaf damage to some plant families (e.g. legumes). This could be used as part of a conservation strategy for protected species. Overall, the effects of the dominant habitat type in the vicinity and diverse vegetation outweighed those of temperature and large-scale land use (e.g. grassland proportion, landscape diversity) on herbivory of legumes, forbs and grasses at the present time.
Chapter 3 – Landscape diversity and local temperature, but not climate, affect arthropod predation among habitat types
Herbivorous insects underlie top-down regulation by arthropod predators. Thereby, predation rates depend on predator community composition and behaviour, which is shaped by temperature, plant richness and land use. How the interaction of these factors affects the regulatory performance of predators was unknown. Therefore, we assessed arthropod predation rates on artificial caterpillars along temperature, and land-use gradients. On plots with low local mean temperature (≤ 7°C) often not a single caterpillar was attacked, which may be due to the temperature-dependent inactivity of arthropods. However, multi-annual mean temperature, plant richness and the dominant habitat type in the vicinity did not substantially affect arthropod predation rates. Highest arthropod predation rates were observed in diverse landscapes (2-km scale) independently of the locally dominanting habitat type. As landscape diversity, but not multi-annual mean temperature, affected arthropod predation rates, the diversification of landscapes may also support top-down regulation of herbivores independent of moderate increases of multi-annual mean temperature in the near future.
Chapter 4 – Pest control and yield of winter oilseed rape depend on spatiotemporal crop-cover dynamics and flowering onset: implications for global warming
Winter oilseed rape is an important oilseed crop in Europe, yet its seed yield is diminished through pests such as the pollen beetle and stem weevils. Damage from pollen beetles depends on pest abundances, but also on the timing of infestation relative to crop development as the bud stage is particularly vulnerable. The development of both oilseed rape and pollen beetles is temperature-dependent, while temperature effects on pest abundances are yet unknown, which brings opportunities and dangers to oilseed rape cropping under increased temperatures. We obtained measures of winter oilseed rape (flowering time, seed yield) and two of its major pests (pollen beetle, stem weevils) for the first time along both land-use and temperature gradients. Infestation with stem weevils was not influenced by any temperature or land-use aspect considered, and natural pest regulation of pollen beetles in terms of parasitism rates of pollen beetle larvae was low (< 30%), except on three out of 29 plots. Nonetheless, we could identify conditions favouring low pollen beetle abundances per plant and high seed yields. Low pollen beetle densities were favoured by a constant oilseed rape area relative to the preceding year (5-km scale), whereas a strong reduction in area (> 40%) caused high pest densities (concentration effect). This occurred more frequently in warmer regions, due to drought around sowing, which contributed to increased pollen beetle numbers in those regions. Yet, in warmer regions, oilseed rape flowered early, which possibly led to partial escape from pollen beetle infestation in the most vulnerable bud stage. This is also suggested by higher seed yields of early flowering oilseed rape fields, but not per se at higher temperatures. Thus, early flowering (e.g. cultivar selection) and the interannual coordination of oilseed rape area offer opportunities for environmental-friendly pollen beetle management.
Chapter 5 – General discussion
Anthropogenic land-use and climate change are major threats to biodiversity, and consequently to ecosystem functions, although I could show that ecosystem functions such as herbivory and predation barely responded to temperature along a spatial gradient at present time. Yet, it is important to keep several points in mind: (i) The high rate of climate warming likely reduces the time that species will have to adapt to temperature in the future; (ii) Beyond mean temperatures, many aspects of climate will change; (iii) The compensation of biodiversity loss through functional redundancy in arthropod communities may be depleted at some point; (iv) Measures of ecosystem functions are limited by methodological filters, so that changes may be captured incompletely. Although much uncertainty of the effects of climate and land-use change on ecosystem functions remains, actions to halt biodiversity loss and to interfere with natural processes in an environmentally friendly way, e.g. reduction of herbivory on crops, are urgently needed. With this thesis, I contribute options to the environment-friendly regulation of herbivory, which are at least to some extent climate resilient, and at the same time make a contribution to halt biodiversity loss. Yet, more research and a transformation process is needed to make human action more sustainable. In terms of crop protection, this means that the most common method of treating pests with fast-acting pesticides is not necessarily the most sustainable. To realize sustainable strategies, collective efforts will be needed targeted at crop damage prevention through reducing pest populations and densities in the medium to long term. The sooner we transform human action from environmentally damaging to biodiversity promoting, the higher is our insurance asset that secures human well-being under a changing climate.
Within the last decades, land use intensification reduced the heterogeneity of habitats and landscapes. The resulting pauperization led to habitats and landscapes that are spatially or temporally limited in food and nesting resources for solitary bees and wasps. Hence, biodiversity and ecosystem processes are seriously threatened. The impacts of changing resource conditions for valuable pollinators and (pest) predators remain poorly studied as well as their top-down regulation by natural enemies. Further, the reproductive success of solitary bees as response to changed resource distribution within foraging ranges is rarely examined. We considered trap-nesting bees, wasps and their antagonists as suitable model organisms to fill these gaps of knowledge, since trap nests provide insight into otherwise hidden trophic interactions, like parasitism and predation, as well as ecological processes, like pollination and reproduction. Moreover, trap-nesting species are established as essential biodiversity indicator taxa. Thus, we first asked in Chapter II how the reproduction of cavity-nesting bees and wasps in grasslands depends on local management Moreover, we tested land use effects on the effectiveness of two groups of antagonists in regulating bee and wasp populations by excluding ground-dwelling antagonists. We characterized nest closure type to determine their protective function against antagonist attacks. In a highly replicated, large-scaled study, we provided 95 grassland sites in three geographic regions in Germany with 760 trap-nests. The full factorial design comprised mown and unmown plots as well as plots with and without access of ground-dwelling predators to the trap nests. The colonization of bees and wasps was unaffected by ground-dwelling antagonists. However, excluding ground-dwellers enhanced the attack rate of flying antagonists. Experimental mowing marginally affected the colonization of wasps but not attack rates. Nevertheless, both treatments – mowing and predator exclusion – significantly interacted. The exclusion of ground-dwellers on mown plots resulted in higher attack rates of flying antagonists, whereas on unmown plots this effect of ground-dweller-exclusion on the attack rate of flying antagonists was not visible. Further, attack rates were determined by nest closure material, local abundance of different nest closure types as well as closure-associated antagonist species. In Chapter III, we studied the relative impact of local land use intensity, landscape composition and configuration on the species richness and abundance of bees, wasps and their antagonists. We analysed abundances and species numbers of hosts and their antagonists as well as parasitism rate and conducted a comprehensive landscape mapping. The digitized landscape data were the basis for further calculations of landscape metrics, like landscape composition and configuration within eight spatial scales ranging from 250 to 2,000 m radii. We used a compound, additive index of local land use intensity. Host abundance was only marginally negatively affected by local land use intensity. However, landscape composition at small spatial scales enhanced the species richness and abundance of hosts, while species richness and abundance of antagonists was positively related to landscape configuration at larger spatial scales. In the last study, presented in Chapter IV, we observed nesting bees on a selection of 18 grassland sites in two of the three research regions. We estimated the importance of resource distribution for pollen-nectar trips and consequences for the reproductive success of the solitary Red Mason Bee (Osmia bicornis). Local land use intensity, local flower cover as well as landscape composition and configuration were considered as critical factors of influence. We equipped each grassland site with eight trap nests and 50 female bees. Different nest building activities, like foraging trips for pollen and nectar, were measured. After the nesting season, we calculated measures of reproductive success. Foraging trips for pollen and nectar were significantly shorter in spatially complex landscapes but were neither affected by local metrics nor landscape composition. We found no evidence that the duration of pollen-nectar trips determines the reproductive success. Thus, to maintain trophic interactions and biodiversity, local land use as well as landscape diversity and spatial complexity should be accounted for to create spatial and temporal stability of food and nesting resources within small spatial scales. Concrete steps to support pollinator populations include hedges, sown field margins or other linear elements. These measures that enhance the connectivity of landscapes can also support flying antagonists.